Or maybe russinas do not like it when you:
- interfere with their national interests and internal affiars.
- call their leaders killers and other colorful terms.
- you push a political system they find of dubious use and utility, and that does not work nearly as well as advertised.
Oh, are you Russian? Because if so, this explains a lot. Well, let's see...
"Interfere with national interests and international affairs."
The Berlin Blockade. The Korean War. Soviet intervention in Vietnam (as in, actual Russians fighting the Americans). The invasion of Afghanistan. KAL Flight 007 (preceded by another flight, 902, five years earlier). Fuckery in Latin America.
Not to mention the shit Russia has historically gotten up to in its warm water ports and territorial expansion. "For defensive reasons"...right. Russia tries to dominate if not outright conquer its neighbors. Its neighbors then react by banding together with other parties for protection. Russia has Surprised Pikachu face. Maybe it's because Russia is generally seen as a much bigger asshole on the world stage and its own shit stinks just as much?
"Calling its leaders killers."
Yeah, because it's pretty obvious that low-level Russian troops who went into places like Chechnya or Georgia weren't just doing it for shits and giggles -they were ordered by Russian leadership to do so. Issues over whether Chechnya had the right to try and secede or not, the Russians had a habit of committing serious war crimes. Same with Georgia. Or, to blame Putin personally:
Aleksandr Litvinenko.
Aleksandr Perepilichny.
For those who were poisoned but didn't die:
Alexei Navalny.
Viktor Yuschenko.
Sergei Skripal.
Vladimir Kara-Murza.
Pyotr Verzilov.
Anna Politkovskaya (side note she was gunned down two years later outside her apartment and nobody ever caught the killer).
Or the wave of apartment bombings in 2000, which only ended when a couple of FSB agents were caught with live explosives and detonators and arrested by the locals. It was claimed to be a "training exercise"...that nobody had any record or knowledge of.
Whatever Putin's personal involvement, he is the man at the top and the ruble stops with him. So, as they say "If the shoe fits..."
"Pushing a political system Russians regard as being of dubious value." This one...well, as the old saying goes, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all of the others that have been tried."
What the West was hoping for was a democratic Russia that, even if a competitor, was also a country which wouldn't be aggressive, wouldn't go around suppressing dissent at home and abroad, etc. The U.S. in particular drastically fucked that up in backing Yeltsin to the hilt and following the advice of the Treasury and Commerce Departments (who said Russia needed a strong market economy in order to liberalize*), as opposed to the State and Justice Departments, who said what was really needed was to help Russia establish a strong and robust legal system and civic framework.
So I get the disillusionment there, but at the same time, it wasn't done to screw Russia, it was just a series of really stupid mistakes by Bill Clinton, who isn't what anyone on here or other forums would call a genius in international relations.
Google Macron, EU Army.
Google LePen Russia.
I don't have to, because I know what those are, and as I pointed out earlier, have become pipe dreams in recent weeks for the former. The latter? Le Pen (like her old man) is and always has been a fucking idiot with a love affair for dictators who aren't left wing. She's only gaining traction in France for the same reason Trump and Johnson did in the U.S. and UK -because it's a radical shift from current affairs. It's less broad support and more the public telling the politicians to pull their heads out of their asses.
I am talking to somebody who has drank the neoliberal Hegemony Kool Aid, why don't you educate yourself further by watching the videos of John Mearsheimer that I linked to.
I am sure that he is clueless as well and you can refute his thesis like you did mine, oh, wait, you did not.
See, I don't have time to watch videos, I have a life outside of here. But I don't need to, because I've been reading stuff by Mearsheimer (and Stephen Walt, and Robert Putnam, and a bunch of others, including Fukuyama but also Samuel Huntingdon) since I was a freshman in college, and that was required for my undergrad degree.
I'm not some neo-whatever on foreign policy, but rather someone who knows that my country had to intervene twice in shooting wars in Europe (the latter in Asia as well, which was particularly bloody), and while we didn't suffer the same casualties as the Russians, we also didn't want a situation where a European controlled Russia could directly threaten our shores. Because Russia has a history of expansionism, and combined with the various forms of Russian chauvinism, means that, inevitably, tensions get hot. THAT is why we created NATO (which the Russians did try to interfere with from the inside but the U.S. wisely said no) and stayed engaged with Western Europe. Because the consequences otherwise would ultimately be dire, and we didn't want that. Nor does most of Europe (especially the eastern half which remembers the bad old days and so doesn't want it even more), which is why they've aligned with NATO. Russia whining about that and then doing the things it does only INCREASE those fears, and so it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Like Russian Hackers, or Russian Invasions, or imaginary Nazis.
Or Islamic Fundamentalists that "Want to destroy America for your freedoms"
Are you denying that the Solar Winds hacks occurred? Or the attack on the Colonial Pipeline? Because Russian protestations in the face of hard evidence...have pretty much no credibility.*
During the past year, 58% of all cyberattacks observed by Microsoft from nation-states have come from Russia. And attacks from Russian nation-state actors are increasingly effective, jumping from a 21% successful compromise rate last year to a 32% rate this year. Russian nation-state actors are...
blogs.microsoft.com
Nazis? Maybe that comes from the leftward end of the political spectrum but to be fair, Russia in general IS very reactionary in how it treats gays and so forth compared to the West.
Islamic fundamentalism? This is 2022, not 2002. If anything, the concern mainly shifted to focus on threats outside the homeland -though, as we have seen in recent days in Dallas, such threats still exist. Fun fact, by the way: Russia actually tried framing their shenanigans in Georgia prior to the 2008 invasion as part of the War on Terror...except the U.S. knew what they were doing and got involved themselves. Leaving the Russians fuming because they'd overplayed their hand and it blew up in their faces again.**
If you want to continue worshiping at the altar of NeoLib gibberish, go ahead.
My concern isn't really getting involved everywhere and anywhere, but rather in those particular areas where our adversaries are causing trouble. I'm not advocating getting directly involved in Ukraine, but I *am* advocating standing up to a bully sooner rather than later, because we've seen this story before, and it always ends in tears.
*-In one particularly memorable moment, Georgia shot down a Russian jet and captured the pilot. Despite the plane's markings, the guy being alive with his Russian military flight suit and Russian military IDs, Russia claimed it was really a Georgian aircraft as a false flag...even after it was pointed out Georgia didn't *have* those kinds of jets. So...Russian protestations ring pretty hollow.
**-You want my personal opinion, it's that Russia will succeed in getting its way after it invades Ukraine, but ends up getting neutered in the Baltic as Sweden and Finland join NATO, the various member states slap sense into Germany, and re-arm while cutting any dependences they have in Russia. Oh, and for added fun, mechanized forces get permanently stationed in Poland and Eastern Europe as insurance against incursions into NATO territory.
Russia may get what it wants in the short term. Long term, though, it's only fucking itself. Ironically, by projecting its own way of thinking (mirror imaging, it's called) onto NATO instead of doing some serious self-reflection, Russia is digging itself deeper. Nobody gave a shit about Georgia or Central Asia. Hell, most people don't now. But Russia seems determined to fuck itself.