On the bright side most of the problems with LA and New York would be fixed. Also. I call dibs on the title of raider warlord.All I'm going to say is that I'm glad I live close enough to likely targets in a Russian nuclear strike on the US that I won't have to deal with the aftermath. Hope you neocon warmongers are happy with yourselves and have real big epeens right about now, I'm looking at you, Zach.
Never took you for a drama queen.All I'm going to say is that I'm glad I live close enough to likely targets in a Russian nuclear strike on the US that I won't have to deal with the aftermath. Hope you neocon warmongers are happy with yourselves and have real big epeens right about now, I'm looking at you, Zach.
When a large amount of people in the military have been calling this for a while n9w, yall didn't believe. Now I am the villain
Calling what is going on.Calling for what? I'm a little confused as to what this is all about.
Seeing as I don't know that much about the Korean war asides from them thinking that conventional warfare was over and done with and massively under supplying themselves with conventional ordnance I will assume you are in the right until I have time to do some research.The problem for the US was they drank their own Kool-Aide and drew all the wrong lessons from WW2 where they fought a rich man's war while the Soviets' lessons were ignored. They also drew all the wrong conclusions as to the German defeats.
The Soviets on the other hand once the war was over, massively overhauled their Army, accelerating the reforms once Stalin was dead and no longer team-killing them.
So when the Chinese hit them and threw all their plans in the toilet, they suffered an operational shock and were routed where as if they had kept their cool, and utilized their advantages and aggressively counter-attacked in Corps level formations, they would have thrown the Chinese back.
In short, it sounds like your country is trying to stretch things out and keep its hands clean of the thing.Fake news, it is still being discussed. It won't be as quick as expected though, because they have to be made interoperable with UAF rather than NATO, and can't risk having NATO IFF and comm gear get captured.
All I'm going to say is that I'm glad I live close enough to likely targets in a Russian nuclear strike on the US that I won't have to deal with the aftermath. Hope you neocon warmongers are happy with yourselves and have real big epeens right about now, I'm looking at you, Zach.
You mean where you utterly failed to back up your claims?Or you can simply backtrack several pages where it was already discussed.
You mean Operation Reality where Russia is loosing vehicles, equipment, and troops at something like a 3 to 1 ratio to Ukraine?As for your hoped for attrition strategy, sorry but the math doesn't support your notion. Nor does the Operational Reality on the ground.
I'd say most likely false, but not a bad play given the bullshit that Zelensky has been pulling for the past week.
You mean where you utterly failed to back up your claims?
You mean Operation Reality where Russia is loosing vehicles, equipment, and troops at something like a 3 to 1 ratio to Ukraine?
Most Ukrainian claims have been disproven within 24 to 48 hours.
When a large amount of people in the military have been calling this for a while n9w, yall didn't believe. Now I am the villain
You mean where you utterly failed to back up your claims?
You mean Operation Reality where Russia is loosing vehicles, equipment, and troops at something like a 3 to 1 ratio to Ukraine?
We shouldn't and won't get invovled with troops on ground. I am for Ukraine because they are less guilty then Russia. Our government is doing a horrible job...Well, let's make it clear then.
What's your position on the Ukranian-Russian war? Do we get involved? Is Russia in the right? Is Ukraine? Is the West? Should we intervene? Or simply stand by and let it happen? Or try to broker a peace agreement?
Go on, keep wishfully thinking everyone is secretly simping for Russia.In short, it sounds like your country is trying to stretch things out and keep its hands clean of the thing.
I think even your leadership must have understood that prolonging this war will bring them more refugees and more inflation, as well as a risk of Russian counter-escalation.
We shouldn't and won't get invovled with troops on ground. I am for Ukraine because they are less guilty then Russia. Our government is doing a horrible job...
We should try and just support the weapons of the Ukrainians
You wanted this war, instigated it by crossing Putin's red lines, and then didn't have the guts to go pay the consequences for it.
Lord Sunhawk is perfectly in his rights to call you out for it.
Zs duct taped over the UkA markings.
If that is meant to be literal, then the Ukrainians are basically besieging themselves then.
Well time for a catchy tune comrades:
This was going to happen if the government of Ukraine is not a puppet of Russia.Okay, a reasonable position.
My position is that we shouldn't and won't get involved. Not enough for a direct confrontation.
I am neither for nor against Ukraine. Russia is not exactly clean for how they've handled this mess with Ukraine from the start, but the West made the situation worse. If they did not consider the ramifications for trying to draw Ukraine into our orbit, then they're fools. If they did, but did this anyway, they're bastards.
I consider Ukraine's leadership to be both corrupt and delusional. I think Kiev is drunk on the possibilities of what Ukraine might have were it to join the EU and is willing to wage a war to gain access to it and NATO weapons. That is after all, what this war is about. I think the way Zelensky has handled the peace before it came to war is absolutely disgusting and delusional. I think Zelensky and his admin are (by necessity) outright lying about the damage they're inflicting upon the Russians and the willingness of Ukrainians to fight against Russia. A million and a half people fleeing the country does not paint strong resolution in my mind.
As for the West, we have only made the problem worse. We could have forestalled or removed the threat of Russian invasion had we only agreed to not allow Ukraine into NATO. There would be no real loss actual strategic cooperation, only face. It's no secret that the US and China are scaling up for a cold war. It's no secret that we cannot contain both Russia and China at once, nor can we fight both. Nor is it a secret that Russia is a declining power and this move is to simply preserve its survival, not grow its strength.
I think that Russia is making the right move for strategic reasons. Allowing Ukraine to fall into the hands of the West is a threat to Russia itself. All that remains is to see if Moscow and the Russians conduct themselves well in war. And thus far, the Russians have not wholly abandoned the rules of war and I'd dare say that Ukraine is more guilty of it than they (again, that being out of necessity). We'll see what happens later.
Dude, I know you Poles have a thing for shenanigans with strawpeople, but I for one don't care about them and prefer spinning doges, remember!Go on, keep wishfully thinking everyone is secretly simping for Russia.
@Agent23 ,what counter-escalation ? KGB arleady escalated by starting war.Only counter could be made by NATO.
And it woud happen only if Biden handlers and Putin agreed to that in their plans.