US Biolabs In the Ukraine

Floridaman

Well-known member
Ok but is there enough native stuff to make it actually saving money instead of putting it... oh, I dunno... in India? I dunno, I just feel like Mongolia doesn't really scream "PUT BIOLAB HERE"... and I mean, if they were going for obscurity... I feel like Madgascar would be better...
The Indian government isn't poor, so they would say no.... also india likes having itds own foreign policy so DC can't be sure india wouldn't just seize it.
 

DarthOne

☦️
I am posting this information because it is related to the topic at hand and help this thread to serve as a historical archive of sorts. If this information has come up previously, I still think it would be best to have it all compiled in one spot and not spread out over the thread, even if it is just to disprove it as false.



DC_Draino
@DC_Draino
·
Feb 1
We just endured the worst pandemic in 100 years after a lab leaked a deadly virus & now we learn from Hunter Biden's laptop that he's a partial owner of a bioweapon facility in Ukraine targeted by Putin that received DoD funding & it's somehow not the biggest story in the world

DC_Draino
@DC_Draino
For those scratching their heads, this thread within a thread will blow your minds


DC_Draino

@DC_Draino



Remember when the Pentagon confirmed the US partnered w/46 Ukrainian Bioweapon labs?

And Hunter Biden secured millions for 1 of the labs - Metabiota?

Well now we have a 2/24/22 letter from Zelensky ordering the destruction of all gov't files for Metabiota

I'm sure it's nothing

Image

https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1619784534953984000/photo/4

2:48 PM · Jan 29, 2023


DC_Draino

@DC_Draino
·
Jan 29

Replying to
@DC_Draino
Did Zelensky keep some of the more incriminating documents against Hunter at Metabiota and Burisma to use as extortion against Joe Biden to get more money and weapons?

We all know the answer





Clandestine


@WarClandestine



1) Folks, there are some big things in the works going on behind the scenes right now.

You will need to brush up on the Ukrainian State decree from Zelensky on 02/24/2022, the day the missile strikes began.

See below

Image



2:29 AM · Jan 29, 2023·


2) Zelensky ordered the Ukrainian MoD to destroy all State docs associated with Hunter Biden's biolab company "METABIOTA and Battelle".

Zelensky was trying to cover up their connection to Biden and the Biolabs.

Zelensky Ordered Destruction of All State Docs Associated with METABIOTA on 02/24/22


Clandestine

Jun 14, 2022
205
5


🚨BOMBSHELL FROM RUSSIA🚨
Ukrainian document released to Russian media outlet, @izvestia, showing decree from Zelensky to destroy all files on Ukrainian defense service members, employees and staff of the state, and any involvement with Hunter Biden's biolab METABIOTA, on 02/24/22, the same day the air strikes on Ukraine began.
See original document above on the left and then translated in English on the right. Holy shit is this a doozy. But wait, there's a lot more.
Remember that infamous video of Ukrainian MIL burning documents RIGHT IN FRONT of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense building in Kyiv, Ukraine? On 02/24/22 THE SAME DAY OF THE DECREE FROM ZELENSKY.
Yup. The MSM broadcasted a video of Ukrainian MIL destroying evidence of Ukrainian State involvement with HUNTER BIDEN'S BIOLAB in Ukraine, right as Russia was beginning its missile strikes.
You guys… we caught them all. We caught them in broad daylight on MSM. Check it out.


So yeah digest that for a moment, and then there's more.

This Ukrainian document release came at the same time as an official press release from Russia via the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, this morning, demanding the US comply with the investigation into their biological activity in the post-Soviet space.

In the article, Zakharova lays out a response to the US DoD response from 06/09/22 in which the US deny any such nefarious US DoD activity in Ukraine. Zakharova stated, "We call on American colleagues to show professionalism and instead of propaganda information stuffing to urgently engage in substantive work to correct the situation related to their military and biological activities in the countries of the former USSR."

Here are a couple of important excerpt from the interview:

Will the Russian side take any measures to increase control over U.S. activities in biolaboratories in the post-Soviet space?

"Yes, we intend to use mechanisms in the near future, in accordance with articles V and VI of the Convention, which provide for consultations between States parties to the BTWC in resolving any issues regarding the purpose of the Convention or in connection with the implementation of its provisions, as well as cooperation in any investigations into possible violations of obligations under the BTWC."

How, in your opinion, should the interaction between Moscow and Washington be built to build confidence and comply with the provisions of this Convention on the Prohibition of Biological and Toxin Weapons?

"We call on the United States, as the depositary of the BTWC, to take a responsible approach to fulfillment of its obligations under the Convention, in fact, to contribute to strengthening the regime of this important disarmament mechanism for international security. We expect to provide not general information, but substantive explanations on specific issues raised by the Russian side in connection with U.S. military and biological activities in the post-Soviet space."

So essentially Russia is saying the US has to comply with the UN and that they have been stonewalling any such investigation for decades. Russia is demanding the US cooperate and answer any concerns about their biological activity in post-Soviet states, like Ukraine, Georgia, etc.

Here's the article, there's an option for english translation.


So Russia just released the little snippet that Zelensky was actively covering up Ukrainian involvement with Metabiota specifically, which confirms Zelensky knew what was going on, knew this was why Russia was moving in, knew that the labs exist, etc etc. This proves the Ukrainians are more than complicit and proves they knew that Biden was directly engaged in nefarious activity at this lab.

Russia is slowly letting evidence slip out and they claim to have a whole lot more. They are asking for US cooperation so we can clean it up together, but Biden also happens to be directly responsible for the biological crimes against humanity.

Can we depend on the UN to do their part and demand the US comply? I'm not sure. But Russia is going to keep releasing information and evidence until they do. Russia is attempting diplomacy, and if the leaders of the US had any intention of world peace, they would agree.

-Clandestine


3) Y'all remember when the MSM was showing the Ukrainian MoD and Military intelligence headquarters burning documents outside of their buildings?

On 02/24/2022. The same day as the Zelensky Decree seen above.

They were covering up their affiliation to US biological malfeasance




4) This will be extremely relevant very soon.

HUGE things in the works!

Stay tuned.




TBC
 

DarthOne

☦️


Clandestine


@WarClandestine


1) Now that I have everyone's attention, allow me to address why US establishment politicians are sending tanks, jets, weapons, equipment, and $100+ billion to Ukraine.

It has nothing to do with Ukrainian citizens, and everything to do with Deep State assets/secrets in Ukraine.

https://mobile.twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1619886316371726341/photo/2

9:32 PM · Jan 29, 2023·
11.2M
Views
2) Let's go back to when and where it all began.

Flashback to 2005. Then Senator Obama and Senator Lugar visited former Soviet biological and chemical facilities in Ukraine, and established the US Deep State roots in Ukraine.

To "counter bioweapons".
https://t.co/wyQ0ZngFnB

9:32 PM · Jan 29, 2023·
871.7K
Views

U.S. to Aid Ukraine in Countering Bioweapons
By Jo Warrick
August 30, 2005
The United States and Ukraine agreed yesterday to work jointly to prevent the spread of biological weapons, signing a pact that clears the way for Ukraine's government to receive U.S. aid to improve security at facilities where dangerous microbes are kept.
The agreement, the result of more than a year of negotiations, was announced by Sens. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) during a visit to the Ukrainian capital, Kiev. The senators credited Ukraine's reformist leaders, ushered into power by last fall's Orange Revolution, with breaking bureaucratic resistance to the pact.
One lab to receive funding is the I.I. Mechnikov Antiplague Scientific and Research Institute, in the Black Sea port city of Odessa. The institute was part of a Cold War network of "antiplague" stations that supplied highly lethal pathogens to Soviet bioweapons factories.

"This agreement will allow us to begin addressing the problems faced by the Odessa antiplague institute and places like it," said Mark Helmke, a staff member for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which Lugar chairs. Under the pact, the United States will fund security upgrades at key Ukrainian biological institutes and support peaceful research by Ukrainian scientists to fight the spread of natural diseases, Helmke said. The amount of funding has not been determined.
The senators' visit to Russia and Ukraine was disrupted Sunday when local authorities refused to allow the delegation's military plane to leave Perm, a city in Russia's Ural Mountains. The officials demanded that they be allowed to search the plane, then relented after several hours and allowed the aircraft to proceed to Ukraine, a spokesman for Lugar said. Yesterday, Russia's Foreign Ministry formally apologized for the incident.
Viktor Yushchenko, left, the president of Ukraine, greets Sens. Richard G. Lugar, center, and Barack Obama during their visit to the capital, Kiev.

3) When speaking of the labs in 2005, here is how they were described by WaPo.

The labs were "part of a Cold War network of 'antiplague' stations that supplied highly lethal pathogens to Soviet bioweapons factories".

So when Russia does "anti-plague" research its "bioweapons".


Image




4) But when the US does "defensive gain of function/directed evolution" research, it's not bioweapons.

In 2005
@washingtonpost
admits that "anti-plague" research results in the production of "highly lethal pathogens" aka "bioweapons".

Seems their tune changed in 2022.


Image





5) The US, led by Obama, passed the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005.

The US took over former Soviet labs and facilities, supposedly to destroy stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in Ukraine.


S.313 - Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005109th Congress (2005-2006)

S.313 - Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005109th Congress (2005-2006)


Sponsor:Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN] (Introduced 02/08/2005)
Committees:Senate - Armed Services
Latest Action:Senate - 02/08/2005 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (All Actions)
Tracker: TipThis bill has the status Introduced
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
  1. Introduced

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (02/08/2005)


[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]







109th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 313

To improve authorities to address urgent nonproliferation crises and
United States nonproliferation operations.


_______________________________________________________________________


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

February 8, 2005

Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Reed, Mr. Biden,
Mr. Levin, Ms. Collins, Mr. McCain and Mr. Obama) introduced the
following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL



To improve authorities to address urgent nonproliferation crises and
United States nonproliferation operations.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat
Reduction Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The possession by hostile states or terrorist groups of
nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of mass destruction
or related materials or means of delivery represents the
greatest threat to the national security of the United States
in the 21st century.
(2) It is the highest priority of the United States to
protect its territory, people, armed forces, allies, and
friends from attacks by dangerous regimes or terrorist groups
using weapons of mass destruction or related materials or means
of delivery.
(3) It is the policy of the United States to ensure and
strengthen verification and compliance with the Treaty on the
Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington,
London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force March
5, 1970 (commonly known as the ``Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty''), the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction, with Annexes, done at Paris
January 13, 1993, and entered into force April 29, 1997
(commonly known as the ``Chemical Weapons Convention''), the
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production
and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin
Weapons and on Their Destruction, done at Washington, London,
and Moscow April 10, 1972, and entered into force March 26,
1975 (commonly known as the ``Biological Weapons Convention''),
the safeguards system of the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA), and the commitments and control lists of the Missile
Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the Australia Group (AG), the
Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), and the Wassenaar Arrangement on
Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and
Technologies (WA).
(4) The national security interests of the United States
have been well-served by the enactment of the Soviet Nuclear
Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of Public Law 102-228;
22 U.S.C. 2551 note), (commonly known as the ``Nunn-Lugar
Act''), its successor law, the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act
of 1993 (title XII of Public Law 103-160; 22 U.S.C. 5951 note),
and the Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996
(title XIV of Public Law 104-201; 50 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.),
(commonly known as the ``Nunn-Lugar-Domenici Act'').
(5) The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program
has, as of January 2005--
(A) deactivated 6,564 nuclear warheads;
(B) destroyed 568 intercontinental ballistic
missiles;
(C) eliminated 477 intercontinental ballistic
missile silos;
(D) destroyed 17 mobile intercontinental ballistic
missile launchers;
(E) eliminated 142 bombers;
(F) destroyed 761 nuclear air-to-surface missiles;
(G) eliminated 420 submarine-launched ballistic
missile launchers;
(H) eliminated 543 submarine-launched ballistic
missiles;
(I) destroyed 28 strategic nuclear submarines; and
(J) sealed 194 nuclear test tunnels or holes.
(6) On February 11, 2004, President George W. Bush called
for the expansion of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat
Reduction program, stating: ``I propose to expand our efforts
to keep weapons from the Cold War and other dangerous materials
out of the wrong hands. In 1991, Congress passed the Nunn-Lugar
legislation. Senator Lugar had a clear vision, along with
Senator Nunn, about what to do with the old Soviet Union. Under
this program, we're helping former Soviet states find productive
employment for former weapons scientists. We're dismantling,
destroying, and securing weapons and materials left over from the
Soviet WMD arsenal. We have more work to do there.''

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) all United States capabilities must be utilized to
prevent acts of catastrophic terrorism using weapons of mass
destruction or related materials or means of delivery;
(2) in order to prevent acts of catastrophic terrorism
using weapons of mass destruction or related materials or means
of delivery, the United States must pursue a strategy making
full and effective use of multilateral and bilateral
agreements, missile defense, arms control, threat reduction
assistance, interdiction efforts, export controls, and United
States proliferation sanctions;
(3) the United States must not allow the world's most
dangerous weapons to fall into the hands of dangerous regimes
and terrorist groups;
(4) the United States must hold nations accountable for all
violations of international nonproliferation treaties, norms,
and standards of conduct, and to the extent that it is
consistent with United States law and policy, provide
assistance to ensure that such treaties, norms, and standards
of conduct are upheld rather than violated; and
(5) the President must be provided the authority to use
Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction funds in a manner
consistent with the high value Congress and the President have
placed on Cooperative Threat Reduction programs to reduce the
threat posed to the national security of the United States and
international peace and security by the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction or related materials or means of
delivery.

SEC. 4. COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS DEFINED.

In this Act, the term ``Cooperative Threat Reduction programs''
means programs and activities specified in section 1501(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law
104-201; 110 Stat. 2731; 50 U.S.C. 2362 note).

SEC. 5. REPEAL OF RESTRICTIONS.

(a) Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991.--Section 211(b) of
the Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of Public Law
102-228; 22 U.S.C. 2551 note) is repealed.
(b) Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993.--Section 1203(d) of
the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (title XII of Public Law
103-160; 22 U.S.C. 5952(d)) is repealed.
(c) Russian Chemical Weapons Destruction Facilities.--Section 1305
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public
Law 106-65; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note) is repealed.

SEC. 6. INAPPLICABILITY OF OTHER RESTRICTIONS.

Section 502 of the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian
Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-511;
106 Stat. 3338; 22 U.S.C. 5852) shall not apply to any Cooperative
Threat Reduction program.

SEC. 7. EXEMPTION FROM LIMITATIONS.

Cooperative Threat Reduction programs may be carried out
notwithstanding any other provision of law, subject to congressional
notification and reporting requirements that apply to the use of funds
available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs or the carrying out
of projects or activities under such programs.

SEC. 8. MODIFICATIONS OF AUTHORITY TO USE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
PROGRAM FUNDS OUTSIDE THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.

Section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1662; 22 U.S.C. 5963) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``President'' each place it appears and
inserting ``Secretary of Defense'';
(2) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking paragraph (2); and
(B) by striking ``each of the following'' and all
that follows through the end and inserting the
following: ``that such project or activity will--
``(1)(A) assist the United States in the resolution of a
critical emerging proliferation threat; or
``(B) permit the United States to take advantage of
opportunities to achieve long-standing nonproliferation goals;
and
``(2) be completed in a short period of time.'';
(3) by striking subsections (c) and (d); and
(4) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (c).

SEC. 9. SPECIAL REPORTS ON ADHERENCE TO ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS AND
NONPROLIFERATION COMMITMENTS.

(a) Reports Required.--At least annually, the Secretary of State
shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on International
Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives a report on each country in which a Cooperative Threat
Reduction program is being carried out. The report shall describe that
country's commitments to--
(1) making substantial national investments in
infrastructure to secure, safeguard, and destroy weapons of
mass destruction;
(2) forgoing any military modernization exceeding
legitimate defense requirements, including replacement of
weapons of mass destruction;
(3) forgoing any use of fissionable materials or any other
components of deactivated nuclear weapons in a new nuclear
weapons program;
(4) complying with all relevant arms control agreements;
(5) adopting and enforcing national and international
export controls over munitions and dual-use items; and
(6) facilitating the verification by the United States and
international community of that country's adherence to such
commitments.
(b) Form.--The reports required under subsection (a) may be
submitted with the reports required under section 403 of the Arms
Control and Disarmament Act (Public Law 87-297; 22 U.S.C. 2593a).
<all>

https://mobile.twitter.com/WarClandestine
Clandestine

@WarClandestine

·
Jan 29

6) Obama opened the floodgates for the Deep State. Created biological weapons programs with the Ukrainian government, and established connections for US oligarchs to build biolab companies in the lawless land of Ukraine.

Companies like Biden's Metabiota. https://twitter.com/canariesblue/status/1449865871577554948…

7) Then the situation turned sour.

Under US "supervision", Ukraine fell into civil war in February 2014 (Obama).

In the disarray of war, State Dept (Clinton) and the CIA, took full control of Ukraine's government.

Nuland facilitated a regime change.

Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A conversation between a State Department official and the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine that was posted on YouTube revealed an embarrassing exchange on U.S. strategy for a political transition in that country, including a crude American swipe at the European Union.


The leaked conversation appeared certain to embarrass the United States and seemed designed to bolster charges - from Russia, among others - that the Ukrainian opposition is being manipulated by Washington, which President Barack Obama's administration strenuously disputes.

U.S. accusations that Russia helped publicize the taped conversation also threatened Washington's already tense relationship with Moscow.

The audio clip, which was posted on Tuesday but gained wide circulation on Thursday, appears to show the official, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, weighing in on the make-up of the next Ukrainian government.

Nuland is heard telling U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt that she doesn't think Vitaly Klitschko, the boxer-turned-politician who is a main opposition leader, should be in a new government.

"So I don't think Klitsch (Klitschko) should go into the government," she said in the recording, which appeared to describe events that occurred in late January. "I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea."

Separately on Thursday, a senior Kremlin aide accused the United States of arming Ukrainian "rebels" and warned Russia could intervene to maintain the security of its neighbor.

U.S. officials, while declining to confirm the recording's contents, did not dispute its authenticity.

"I did not say it was not authentic," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said at a news briefing.

Psaki also criticized Russian officials' publicizing of the tape as "a new low in Russian tradecraft" and denied Washington was trying to meddle or engineer a particular outcome in Kiev.

"Absolutely not," she said. "It should be no surprise that U.S. officials talk about issues around the world. Of course we do. That's what diplomats do."

The audio clip was first posted on Twitter by Dmitry Loskutov, an aide to Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, a diplomatic source said.

US-EU TENSIONS ON UKRAINE

The floating of the audio is an ironic turnabout of sorts for the United States, which snooped on the leaders of allied nations, according to classified documents made public by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

The audio posted on YouTube, along with a second one that captures a reported conversation between senior EU diplomats, reveal apparent rifts between the United States and EU over how to handle Ukraine.

In the first audio, Nuland and Pyatt are heard discussing strategies to work with the three main opposition figures: Klitschko, Arseny Yatseniuk, former Ukrainian economy minister, and Oleh Tyahnybok, the far-right nationalist opposition leader.

Nuland referred to getting the United Nations involved in a political solution in Kiev.

"So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the U.N. help glue it and you know ... fuck the EU," she said in the recording, which was accompanied by still pictures of people mentioned in the call.

Pyatt responded: "Exactly. And I think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does start to gain altitude, the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it."

Psaki said Nuland had apologized to her EU counterparts for the reported comments.

The date of the conversation was not specified but the events it describes appeared to have taken place in the last days of January.

The second recording, purporting to be a conversation between two EU officials, was posted on the same day from the same YouTube account, which has previously carried video showing protesters in a poor light.

In it, Helga Schmid, deputy to EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, is heard complaining about U.S. criticism that the Europeans are not supporting sanctions on Ukrainian individuals in response to violence against anti-government protests.

"It's very annoying that the Americans are going around criticizing the EU and saying we are too soft," Schmid tells Jan Tombinski, the EU ambassador to Ukraine.

A spokeswoman for Ashton said the EU would not comment on a "leaked alleged" conversation.

The simultaneous release of the recordings appeared designed to both discredit the Western powers' involvement in Ukraine and, possibly, to drive a wedge between Brussels and Washington.

'PUPPETS OF MAIDAN'

Nuland met on Thursday with Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich to discuss a solution to anti-government protests that have swept the former Soviet republic since November. They discussed political reform and possible further negotiations between Yanukovich and opposition leaders, his website said.

Yanukovich later flew to Sochi, Russia, where the Winter Olympics are due to open on Friday evening. He was expected to meet there with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Posted anonymously, the first audio clip was headlined "Puppets of Maidan" - clearly aiming to portray opposition leaders as stooges of the U.S. diplomats, who were discussing how the opposition might take up an offer from Yanukovich to form a government.

"Maidan," the Ukrainian word for "square," serves as the name of the whole protest movement that started in Kiev's central Independence Square in November. Critics of Yanukovich have been occupying the square nonstop ever since.

There was no immediate comment from Moscow, but the recording clearly plays into Russian accusations that the West is meddling in Ukraine. Russia sees Ukraine as being within its sphere of influence and has offered the cash-strapped Kiev a $15 billion bailout to keep it in its orbit.

Protests began when Yanukovich spurned an EU trade agreement last year in pursuit of closer ties with Russia. Protesters have since taken over public buildings and staged mass rallies, sometimes clashing violently with police, in the capital Kiev and other cities.

"I think (Yatseniuk) is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. What he needs is (Klitschko) and (Tyahnybok) on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week," Nuland said in the recording.

Pyatt suggested Nuland contact Klitschko personally to play to his "top dog" sensibilities.

"I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn't like it," he said.

Additional reporting Steve Holland in Washington, Gabriela Baczynska and Alistair Macdonald in Ukraine; Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Warren Strobel, Cynthia Osterman and Ken Wills
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

8) Nuland, who spilled the beans on the fear of "Russian forces getting their hands on the biological research in Ukraine", engineered the Color Revolution in Ukraine.

They started a civil war, then picked their puppet to run the government, creating a Deep State proxy.




9) Now with complete control of the Ukrainian government, then the Bidens began their dirty work.

Biden visited Ukraine 13+ times, securing US funding for Ukrainian oligarchs. Then used his power to fire a State prosecutor who figured out Biden's kick-back/laundering scheme.





10) So the reason why all of our tax dollars are in Ukraine, is because Ukraine is a Deep State proxy, controlled by the ruling families of the DNC/Soros.

They are trying to protect their assets/secrets in Ukraine.

Most consequential of which is their biological activity.


Fnr-L7dWYAANdCf



11) The reason the US MSM went all out pro-Ukraine, is because the media is owned by the Pharma companies via advertisement money.

The Pharma companies who rely on the biolabs in Ukraine to create pathogens so their vaccine scheme can profit…

Starting to make sense?
12) The reason the @FBI and @DHSgov went full Orwell and weaponized Big Tech to censor all reporting on the Biolabs in Ukraine, is because intel community is compromised by the Deep State.

The Deep State who can't let people find out about their pathogen production scheme…
Fnr-MZiXkAAnAUo


Fnr-MZhXwAADYB8

13) The reason the House Dems
@DNC
went insane and impeached Trump over making a single phone call to Zelensky in Ukraine… is because they couldn't allow Trump to snoop around and investigate their Deep State proxy.

Trump was on to whatever they were hiding. Aka bioweapons.
14) The reason Zelensky ordered the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense to destroy all State documents affiliated with US biolab companies "Metabiota and Battelle"… the day that missiles started flying (2/24/22)…

Is because he knew Putin was looking for the bioweapons.


Image


Image


16) The reason the @WHO advised Ukraine to destroy all their pathogens (at the labs that the MSM said didn't exist)… is because the WHO knew Putin was looking for the bioweapons.

The same @WHO that created a global medical police-state due to C19.

EXCLUSIVE WHO says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread


March 11, 20222:57 PM ESTLast Updated a year ago

March 11 (Reuters) - The World Health Organization advised Ukraine to destroy high-threat pathogens housed in the country's public health laboratories to prevent "any potential spills" that would spread disease among the population, the agency told Reuters.

Like many other countries, Ukraine has public health laboratories researching how to mitigate the threats of dangerous diseases affecting both animals and humans including, most recently, COVID-19. Its labs have received support from the United States, the European Union and the WHO.

Biosecurity experts say Russia's movement of troops into Ukraine and bombardment of its cities have raised the risk of an escape of disease-causing pathogens, should any of those facilities be damaged.

In response to questions from Reuters about its work with Ukraine ahead of and during Russia's invasion, the WHO said in an email on Thursday that it has collaborated with Ukrainian public health labs for several years to promote security practices that help prevent "accidental or deliberate release of pathogens."

"As part of this work, WHO has strongly recommended to the Ministry of Health in Ukraine and other responsible bodies to destroy high-threat pathogens to prevent any potential spills," the WHO, a United Nations agency, said.

The WHO would not say when it had made the recommendation nor did it provide specifics about the kinds of pathogens or toxins housed in Ukraine's laboratories. The agency also did not answer questions about whether its recommendations were followed.

Ukrainian officials in Kyiv and at their embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment.

Ukraine's laboratory capabilities have been at the center of a growing information war since Russia began moving troops into Ukraine two weeks ago.

On Friday, Russia called a meeting of the 15-member U.N. Security Council to reassert, without providing evidence, a longstanding claim that Ukraine ran biological weapons laboratories with U.S. Defense Department support. read more

The accusation has been repeatedly denied by Ukraine and the United States, where government officials warn Russia may use it as a pretext to deploy its own chemical or biological weapons.

Izumi Nakamitsu, the U.N. High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, told the Security Council on Friday that the United Nations is "not aware" of any biological weapons program in Ukraine, which joined an international ban on such arms, as has Russia and the United States along with 180 other countries.

U.N. officials have also said the WHO, in its work with Ukraine, is not aware of any activity in the country that would violate international treaties "including on chemical weapons or biological weapons."

The WHO statement to Reuters referred solely to public health laboratories. The agency said it encourages all parties to cooperate in "the safe and secure disposal of any pathogens they come across, and to reach out for technical assistance as needed." It offered to help wherever possible with technical guidance and coordination.

15) Big Pharma, MSM, Big Tech, the Intelligence Community, Zelensky, WHO/NIH, and Deep State politicians; are all working together to accomplish the same goal…

To cover up the criminal biological weapons production in Ukraine.

All the entities who happened to benefit from C19.

16) This is why these entities are hyper-defensive about all things related to C19, biological research, and Ukraine.

It's not because they are being philanthropic.

It's because we are close to the proof of their crimes against humanity. For which, the punishment is harsh.

17) Tanks, jets, weapons, equipment, $100+ billion in taxpayer funds, the lives of the Ukrainian people…

All worthy sacrifices in the eyes of the Deep State. Whatever it takes to cover up their bioweapons production.

WW3 already started. C19 was the first weapon fired.

/END



Lori Mills

@LoriMills4CA42

·
Jan 30

Replying to
@WarClandestine and @WHO

The same WHO that said Covid did not transfer human to human Feb. 2020

Fnu-KD4agAUDymO
 

Tiamat

I've seen the future...
Yeah, there are numerous biolabs in Ukraine, old soviet era labs they were busy upgrading so they don’t have a chinese style safety incident. So by what measure is this particular lab or any of her other labs considered bioweapon labs? Every major hospital in the us has some form of biolab to do research on local bacteria, viruses, etc. Hell, my hospital has one.

It would be kind of stupid for the US to be operating a “bioweapon lab” so close to Russia in a country that’s been technically at war with proxy guerillas since 2014, no?
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
I would have counted them as reserve, not primary, as they are absolutely not modern front-line tanks. The fact that some nations still use even more obsolete tanks because that's all they have and/or can afford doesn't change that, and it does substantially change the number counts for what one would consider reasonable/expected military sizes.


United States (Army): ~150 M1A2 SEP v3 + ~ 1,600 M1A2 SEP v2 + ~750 M1A1SA, plus ~4000 reserve M1A1 and M1A2.

Poland: 250 M1A2 SEPv3 + 250 Leopard 2PL active duty, reserve was 200+ T-72 but these are being 'traded' to Ukraine for ~100 M1A1 Abrams.

France: 222 active duty LeClerc + 184 reserve LeClerc.

Germany: ~200 active duty Leopard 2 + ~100 Leopard currently under repair/refit. Intent is to upgrade all 300 active Leopard to a mix of A6 and A7 configuration by 2026.
That only points out that many of SK reserve tanks are about as good as many of NATO states' line tanks. Also half of Poland's Leopards are still A4. Even Germany is keeping around some A4s apparently.




U.S. to Aid Ukraine in Countering Bioweapons




S.313 - Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005109th Congress (2005-2006)



https://mobile.twitter.com/WarClandestine


Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU








EXCLUSIVE WHO says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread






You deserve a big, fat, SO FUCKING WHAT?
It's an old vatnik propaganda story. Since the end of Cold War USA has spent money and effort to get ex-Soviet bioweapon labs into civilian medical research so that they and their staff don't end up for hire/purchase on the terror org black market.
Considering the amount of scaremongering fighting around nuclear plants has generated, obviously destroying the research samples of dangerous pathogens was a reasonable move. Nevermind the possibility of false flag "incident" arranged by RU intelligence using stolen materials.
Reposting this is stupid, and you should feel bad.

For spreading stupid shit like this after the war Russia should be forbidden from having biolabs, because fuck them, they do actual bioweapon research anyway.


You like conspiracy theories? Take that:



COVID couldn't have been made in Ukrainian biolabs because it was made by Russian one :D
It's much more plausible, even explains why the outbreak started in China.
 
Last edited:

DarthOne

☦️
(Shrugs)

I’m just reporting what I found. As for what is true and what isn’t…well, that’s for historians to decide.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder




U.S. to Aid Ukraine in Countering Bioweapons




S.313 - Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2005109th Congress (2005-2006)



https://mobile.twitter.com/WarClandestine


Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU








EXCLUSIVE WHO says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread






Wow, you seriously are pushing the 'Ukrainian biolabs' bullshit again, ignoring the actual historical context of those former Soviet labs/lab personnel, as well as now...



Tourism in 'New Russia'

Overall doesn’t seem that Russia is suffering much from the war and the sanctions from what the video is showing.

Literallly posting unironic tourism adverts for Russia.

I cannot remember the last time you posted anything critical of Russia, or posted anything about their aggression/warcrimes in Ukraine.

The contrarian Right's reaction to the invasion of Ukraine, and the lack of critical thinking beyond 'Biden Bad, Woke Bad, Russia Oppose Biden, Russia Trad, Russia Trustworthy' would be hilarious if it wasn't also so absurd.

I mean that's the real kicker here, is that all of this requires taking Russia at their word for shit, when Russia has repeatedly shown it will break it's word to anyone unless a metaphorical gun is to their head.
(Shrugs)

I’m just reporting what I found. As for what is true and what isn’t…well, that’s for historians to decide.
Or perhaps for people who are actually on the ground and able to give context to things in the moment.

Because I can garuantee you that there is no version of the future where the pro-Russia/anti-Ukraine crowd comes out looking pretty.

It's just do you and the pro-Russia/anti-Ukraine crowd want to be on the "French object to Iraq 2 so we go to 'Freedom Fries' in response" level derision, or the "Was a known Vichy collaborator " level hate when this is done.

The choice is yours.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
> Vatnik!
> this is just a crazy conspiracy theories

just casual dismissal and denial.
for shame.

you guys are so invested in defeating russia that you willfully bury any wrongdoing involving anyone else.
as if russia somehow has a monopoly on doing bad stuff.
 

Tiamat

I've seen the future...
> Vatnik!
> this is just a crazy conspiracy theories

just casual dismissal and denial.
for shame.

you guys are so invested in defeating russia that you willfully bury any wrongdoing involving anyone else.
as if russia somehow has a monopoly on doing bad stuff.

Then please show the evidence for this "theory" about Bioweapon labs in Ukraine. And I mean actual evidence, not more regurgitated Qanon BS.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Then please show the evidence for this "theory" about Bioweapon labs in Ukraine. And I mean actual evidence, not more regurgitated Qanon BS.
> dismisses all evidence all at once
> demands more, different evidence
> posts zero evidence of his own
> refutes none of the individual pieces of evidence posted

you are not coming across as very credible.
I didn't even bother digging into the original post.
don't have the time for yet another deep dive.

but on one side we have people posting a bunch of evidence in a systemic manner.
and on the other side we have hysterical screeches of "vatnik" or casual dismissal of "BS conspiracy theory"

How about you try refuting the already posted evidence.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Russia saw the way the Wu Flu and Wu Flu vax bullshit was fucking with Western society, and decided to gin up some shit about old labs in Ukraine the US was trying to make actually OSHA compliant, instead of USSR complaint, and man, they have got their money's worth for it.

Even some otherwise reasonable people, people who were part of calling out the Wuhan shit, have been snookered by this, and it's just sad.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Russia saw the way the Wu Flu and Wu Flu vax bullshit was fucking with Western society, and decided to gin up some shit about old labs in Ukraine the US was trying to make actually OSHA compliant, instead of USSR complaint, and man, they have got their money's worth for it.

Even some otherwise reasonable people, people who were part of calling out the Wuhan shit, have been snookered by this, and it's just sad.
If that is really the case, then this is partially your fault and that of people like you.
Who instead of refuting the actual bits of evidence, or even just showing skepticism, you go around screeching vatnik / conspiracy theorist at people.

Personally attacking someone is the quickest way to convince them you are wrong.

That being said... what exactly do you think that twitter post is even saying?
Because all it is doing is pointing out some illegal activity and coverups.
which is just business as usual for these people.

we do know that pfizer is doing gain of function directed evolution research on covid



and incidentally. they happened to lose 98 monkeys in an accident not to long ago. releasing some new covid strains which they developed out so they can keep on milking their "cash cow".

pfizer director of development thinks that covid came from that wuhan lab doing gain of function research too... because that is what he is doing. seems legit.

This gain of function bullshit is turning out to be widespread and systematic.

I wouldn't at all be surprised if the bidens were involved in ukrainian biolabs doing shady shit. as they have been involved in so much other shady shit.
this doesn't mean russia are somehow "the good guys".
this does not mean anyone pointing this out is a "vatnik"
this is not even claiming that ukraine was in any way shape or form linked to covid-19.
 

Tiamat

I've seen the future...
> dismisses all evidence all at once
> demands more, different evidence
> posts zero evidence of his own
> refutes none of the individual pieces of evidence posted

you are not coming across as very credible.
I didn't even bother digging into the original post.
don't have the time for yet another deep dive.

but on one side we have people posting a bunch of evidence in a systemic manner.
and on the other side we have hysterical screeches of "vatnik" or casual dismissal of "BS conspiracy theory"

How about you try refuting the already posted evidence.

What evidence? Conspiracy theories grafted from little grains of truth? Hell I should also ask you to provide evidence why i don't come across as "credible".

I asked you to cite evidence for bioweapon labs, you retort telling me to provide evidence to the contrary.

I can already tell by reading some of your previous posts this will be like talking to a water wheel.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Honestly the KGB currently has things on easy mode.
They don't even have to invent shit. just repost actual news as it happens
 

mrttao

Well-known member
What evidence?
Everything in this post
information
and the threads it links
===
Hell I should also ask you to provide evidence why i don't come across as "credible".
You literally quoted it.
but sure let me quote it again
> dismisses all evidence all at once
> demands more, different evidence
> posts zero evidence of his own
> refutes none of the individual pieces of evidence posted
the above is why you are not coming across as credible.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
If that is really the case, then this is partially your fault and that of people like you.
Who instead of refuting the actual bits of evidence, or even just showing skepticism, you go around screeching vatnik / conspiracy theorist at people.

Personally attacking someone is the quickest way to convince them you are wrong.

That being said... what exactly do you think that twitter post is even saying?
Because all it is doing is pointing out some illegal activity and coverups.
which is just business as usual for these people.

we do know that pfizer is doing gain of function directed evolution research on covid



and incidentally. they happened to lose 98 monkeys in an accident not to long ago. releasing some new strains out so they can keep on milking their "cash cow".
pfizer director of development thinks that covid came from that wuhan lab doing gain of function research too. and it seems legit.

This gain of function bullshit is turning out to be widespread and systematic.

I wouldn't at all be surprised if the bidens were involved in ukrainian biolabs doing shady shit. as they have been involved in so much other shady shit.
this doesn't mean russia are somehow "the good guys".
this does not mean anyone pointing this out is a "vatnik"
this is not even claiming that ukraine was in any way shape or form linked to covid-19.

Well, listening to Tucker very much is your first problem here, dude is pretty much the definition of the contrarian Right, aka the NPCs of the Right side of the aisle (Left support, so must be bad, therefore Ukraine/Zelensky bad).

Tucker is sometimes (3-4/10 times) right about domestic stuff, but is worthless for anything international or that has any sort of more complicated context or nuance. I haven't watched or follow Carlson seriously in a long time.

Also, I already posted that Pfizer video in the thread for the Wu Flu stuff, which is not the subject of this thread.

And I have refuted the pieces of evidence, several times, but the people who push this shit just ignore it and repost the same bullshit a few weeks or months later, so I'm not going play the game with them.

I'll admit I thought Putin was not serious about the invasion until I saw the temporary bridge go up in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, and the 1st Guards Tanks Army moved to Belgorod, because I too distrust a lot of the establishment media and politicians. However, I at least never bought this biolab crap, because the context was explained to me, where as pretty much everyone pushing the theory now just completely ignores that context in favor of whatever shit Russia says about Ukraine.

However unlike many here, I can separate Ukraine's defensive situation and needs in the face of a Russian invasion, from our domestic situation and the clusterfuck of a banana republic we now live in. I also can separate good work uncovering Wuhan shit, from the same people getting snookered by Putin's bullshit, because the Russian's have gotten very good at identifying wedge issues in the West to use to keep us from uniting against the next attempt at a Russian Empire.
 

Tiamat

I've seen the future...
Everything in this post

and the threads it links
===

You literally quoted it.
but sure let me quote it again

the above is why you are not coming across as credible.

Jesus, dude, this conspiracy about the "bioweapon labs" was refuted months ago, go read it yourself. Or don't.







Here, will these help for starters?
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Well, listening to Tucker very much is your first problem here, dude is pretty much the definition of the contrarian Right, aka the NPCs of the Right side of the aisle (Left support, so must be bad, therefore Ukraine/Zelensky bad).
facepalm. double facepalm.
I can tell you didn't even click the link

so. TLDR:
project veritas got the director of research of pfizer to admit a bunch of stuff on camera. but having a man take him on a date.
I linked the original video by veritas. it is a must watch.

Tucker on fox news is literally the only MSM that ran the story.
Everyone else has been instead trying to memory hole it.
I linked the tucker report on it due to its notability.

google has blacklisted this.
Youtube has an all hands on deck with their censorship department. having everyone work double time to suppress that video and delete it form the internet.



Dismissing it as "its tucker" is frankly stupid.
because anyone can just watch the original video themselves
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top