Does any of that matter when you've become the modern equivalent of biblical Sodom and Gomorrah?Sure thing,tell me how many times has your country been to the moon? How about became the singular global economic,cultural,and political hegmon?......Oh none yeah f*ck your opinion
Does any of that matter when you've become the modern equivalent of biblical Sodom and Gomorrah?
Anybody can be great, what matters is keeping greatness.
Irish cops can RAID homes and confiscate devices for 'hate speech'
Said ‘hate speech’ probably was ‘I’m against the Irish people getting replaced in their own nation’.
Hey, ‘muh thin blue line’ people. This is what will happen to you too!
That's why I'm not sympathetic to cops and boomers when they complain about the ACAB people.
Is there any hope for Ireland though? Do they have a rightwing party that can use it to drive the snakes out? I actually like the Irish they suffered so much under the Anglos, and they fought them right back.
Authorities in Ireland are set to be given access to private social media conversations in order to spy on anti-mass migration sentiment following the riots in Dublin.
After an Algerian migrant stabbed three children outside a primary school, fiery but mostly peaceful protests broke out in the Irish capital.
Authorities reacted by being more outraged at the protesters than the actual would-be child murderer, who should have been deported 20 years ago and was previously released after being arrested for carrying a knife.
Now Irish people who share spicy memes in WhatsApp chat groups are going to be under government surveillance should this new 'hate speech' legislation pass.
"Gardai will be able to access and intercept private conversations on social media sites under new legislation, as the Justice Minister promised to crack down on crime following the riots in Dublin," reports the Irish Times.
I told you how Irish Justice Minister Helen McEntee implemented mass surveillance of the Irish population last year.
Well now she's trying to pass legislation to allow government and Gardaí access to private conversations on X and Facebook etc.
@elonmusk
.
4:55 AM · Nov 29, 2023
·
42.9K
Views
The new legislation will also empower authorities to demand "cell site location data" from cellphone companies to help them locate dissidents.
According to the critics, the new law would create "de facto mass surveillance of the entire population."
The new law would also fulfil Elon Musk's warning that Irish citizens could be arrested and imprisoned for having a meme on their phone.
As we previously highlighted, Conor McGregor's X posts are already under official investigation after he expressed anger at the stabbings, despite him condemning violence in the aftermath.
Meanwhile, in an extraordinary clip, barrister Joe Brolly described the Algerian migrant who stabbed three children as a "gentleman" and noted how "three women took it upon themselves to protect him and probably saved his life" from the anger of the mob.
Miranda rights are the product of the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, in which the court ruled law enforcement could not use statements by defendants against themselves while in custody unless they were first informed of their rights to a lawyer and against self-incrimination.
A panel of the Ninth Circuit Court ruled Miranda rights don't apply to warrant-backed civil immigration arrests, holding up an order to deport a Mexican citizen who had argued he was coerced into admitting his illegal status under an administrative warrant. Miranda rights are the formal warning given by law enforcement to individuals in custody of their right to silence and an attorney.
In a unanimous, three-judge decision, the Ninth Circuit panel affirmed earlier rulings by an immigration judge and the U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals by rejecting Jose Maria Zuniga De La Cruz's appeal to the court.
"The panel observed that this court has long held that the substantial distinctions between a civil deportation proceeding and a criminal trial make Miranda warnings inappropriate in the deportation context. Zuniga asked this court to forge an exception, arguing that because he was arrested pursuant to an administrative warrant, his un-Mirandized statements should have been excluded," wrote the court in its judgment. "The panel rejected that contention, explaining that Zuniga's focus on the warrant was misplaced because it is the nature of the proceeding (criminal vs. civil), and not the nature of the arrest (warrantless vs. with a warrant) that is relevant."
Zuniga was arrested under an administrative warrant issued not by a judge, as a criminal arrest warrant must be, but by an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement official who believed there was sufficient evidence he was in the country illegally. Zuniga has been in the United States since 2004 and was arrested in 2018 by ICE as part of civil immigration proceedings.
While all three judges signed on to the decision, Circuit Judge Salvador Mendoza—a Biden appointee—argued that "although Miranda applies only to criminal proceedings, he saw no reason not to inform noncitizens of their rights, observing that this court in a previous case had affirmed an injunction requiring immigration agents to inform noncitizens of their right to apply for political asylum and their right to counsel."
Meanwhile, the author of the lead opinion, Circuit Judge Daniel Bress — a Trump appointee — argued there is no legal basis to create this new right, writing Miranda is "not authority for creating new versions of itself in the immigration context."
Miranda rights are the product of the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, in which the court ruled law enforcement could not use statements by defendants against themselves while in custody unless they were first informed of their rights to a lawyer and against self-incrimination.
Yes why on earth would they?Meanwhile in the USA
Federal court rules Miranda rights don't apply to civil immigration arrests
Federal court rules Miranda rights don’t apply to civil immigration arrests
Miranda rights are the product of the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, in which the court ruled law enforcement could not use statements by defendants against themselves while in custody unless they were first informed of their rights to a lawyer and against self-incrimination.justthenews.com
Irish cops can RAID homes and confiscate devices for 'hate speech'
A result of the new hate speech law that was just passed in response to the riots.
Said ‘hate speech’ probably was ‘I’m against the Irish people getting replaced in their own nation’.
Oh and the Irish government and the PM are asking people to stop noticing things and not to link the rise in crime with the rise in mass migration. Which is absolutely and statistically is.
Hey, ‘muh thin blue line’ people. This is what will happen to you too!
Edit: some information errors needed to be fixed.
Yeah and the British would sit pretty right? If the Irish rebelled I wouldn't be surprised if the UK did not launch a "peacekeeping mission" to "help prop up and stabilize the Irish Republic and democracy and tolerance in Ireland."To be honest, if a new IRA-style group started up that was specifically targeting the Irish government, I honestly wouldn't blame them.
Hell, knowing the Irish and what's just happened, I wouldn't be too shocked if a lot of the "Old Crowd" are actually reorganizing but at a different target, which is why the Irish government is panicking so much.
Globalist and Leftist parasites squirm in their hosts when they know there's the possibility of real-life consequences.
Which is why they are raiding homes to search for evidence of "hate speech". gotta preemptively gulag all those peopleTo be honest, if a new IRA-style group started up that was specifically targeting the Irish government, I honestly wouldn't blame them.
Yep.Which is why they are raiding homes to search for evidence of "hate speech". gotta preemptively gulag all those people
Yeah and the British would sit pretty right? If the Irish rebelled I wouldn't be surprised if the UK did not launch a "peacekeeping mission" to "help prop up and stabilize the Irish Republic and democracy and tolerance in Ireland."
The people aren't. The government, which are the typical Leftist/globalist parasites infesting any Western government, are.I am legitimately shocked that a culture that kept murdering each other over protestant vs. catholic, and whether they wanted to be a part of the UK or not is actually going along with this.
Yeah and the British would sit pretty right? If the Irish rebelled I wouldn't be surprised if the UK did not launch a "peacekeeping mission" to "help prop up and stabilize the Irish Republic and democracy and tolerance in Ireland."