Search results

  1. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Well, people in government aren't exactly the brightest bulbs in the box -- this doubles when the reigning political party in the States are the Democrats.
  2. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    As I said in prior posts, the whole "when is it just a clump of cells and when it is actually life" line is blurry and hard to define, but this is a good example of that point of view that others would agree or disagree with. A lot of women get pregnant but show no signs of it ever happening...
  3. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I've never agreed with affirmative action. I don't care if you're male, female, straight, or gay: if you can do the job, that is what counts. Hiring someone because they're Black or gay and they're fucking useless or incompetent at the job over the straight White guy/girl who is competent/more...
  4. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    So, Count Dankula pulled off an epic troll and had Leftards screeching at him. Why, you ask? He convinced them he was a Supreme Court Judge. Yeah, Supreme Court Judge Dankula. And they fell for it. I wish I were making this shit up, but... yeah. :ROFLMAO:
  5. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Most of what I've seen comes from America's Blacks: every time there's a Black celebrity, or lawyer, or police chief, or anyone that doesn't act like a stereotype (such as in the BLM rioters burning down Black businesses. cough Yeah) or toe the line they're supposed to buy into, they get called...
  6. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Except the ones on the Left expect to be given the Daenerys treatment when she liberated the slaves in Essos (you know that screenshot of her being held aloft by all the people? Yeah). :ROFLMAO:
  7. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Ah yes, the ol' "if you don't act like us in basically being zealots or animals, you're an Uncle Tom" argument. smh And Whites are supposed to be the most racist in America, right? /s
  8. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Same thing, really: cluster of cells or considered a person at that point or not, it'll still develop into a person if left unimpeded. Whether it's viewed as just a clump of cells being destroyed or a person being murdered, it's potato potatoe; the result is the same thing. It stops someone...
  9. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    In principle, yes. Those clusters of cell would develop into a human life if everything goes to plan, and destroying them would be stopping a human from coming into being. However, at that point it's still, technically, a cluster of cells. A blueprint. It's not a person but will develop into...
  10. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I can see this too, but that also ties into the whole "when is it a child and not just a clump of cells" argument. Either way, murder or just preventing it from coming to term, it's still not allowing a human life to come to be. It's complicated.
  11. Jormungandr

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Abortion is a complicated issue for both sides of the aisle; men and women. See, I'm pro-choice within reason, but my main issue is with how cavalier a lot of people are with it, as well as how men are actually shafted hard. If a woman is raped and doesn't want to keep the baby? I agree that...
Back
Top