Search results for query: *

Simpsons predicting the future once again!

Oh, ya know, if you live in the more rural states, just ask the local rednecks to begin producing their moonshines for fuel instead of consumption, lol.

When people use "renewable", I always presumed it was the source, not the method, of the generated energy. I conflate the source with finite. We'll always have tides, wind, and the sun; fossil fuels like coal, gas, and oil are going to run out, eventually; they're non-renewable as in finite...

Geothermal can produce a lot of power, if a country has the right prerequisites for it (e.g. Iceland). Many rivers in the UK are especially good for hydroelectric generators, but the trouble is getting the funding for them compared to people wanting go "all in" on solar panels and wind turbines...

Honestly, the best bets to go for (at least in humanity's short-term) are geothermal (if you're lucky, like Iceland), hydro-electric (if you live in areas like the UK, Sweden/Norway, et cetera), and (widespread) nuclear -- emphasis on nuclear. But, of course, public perception of nuclear power...