Search results

  1. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Even in men divisions, they don't stack a five-nothing 100-lb boy against a 6'8 350-450 lb mastodon. It's called a weight division for a reason. If feminist want to hang out with the heavyweights and the superheavyweights, they are going to have to encourage women to lift and bulk up on actual...
  2. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Wait what?
  3. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I'll repeat what I said from another thread.
  4. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Dude seriously I don't know what your sex life was like, but you got HUGE chip on your shoulder that you need to flick off. Constantly chewing on sour grapes isn't going to help your mental health. I've seen way too many people just on the sietch alone fall into the abyss of madness and have had...
  5. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    ok is Glowie and Pedophile really going to be the right winged versions of Nazi and Rapist or something? Not everyone that disagrees with you is a glowie man.
  6. KilroywasNOTHere

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I could be I'm a bit slow to the "obviously" party, but I'm starting to think that the abortion question is less about the subject itself and more about a gateway to striping the rights of those you don't like. At first abortion had to be done early on and now some states allow late term...
Back
Top