No, you don't understand the uniparty conceit: they never work together on elections. They all believe that they are the good guys and the other party is the worst. Only from outside do they appear as one, but they still hardly work together even vs the outside (in fact, they'll fund the outside to spite each other, as we see with dems funding Trumpites in primaries to beat them in the general).You say that like it’s a good thing.
Which by their actions translates to ‘they’ll go back to fighting each other once they don’t need each other’.
They ran that man for senate against another horrible choice. Stop picking losers, and the GOP wouldn't have crumbled.I don't think that matters.
The democrats ran a man for senate who had a stroke and couldn't even talk the quality of your canadates while important isn't as important as having support and a good ground game.
First, he's toxic. The MSM burned all their credibility on it, but they did drag him down with them (though he gave them a lot of help)."Dump Trump"
What about him makes him bad?
Second, the key power of the president is appointments. Outside of judicial appointments (where he was helped by FedSoc), and Betsy DeVos, his appointments have been largely dogshit, based on if they say they profess loyalty to him, nothing else. This extends to his candidate selection, where his candidates lost in all the close races.