America First Caucus Founded

LindyAF

Well-known member
Per wikipedo.

"Slovenian and Basque" doesn't really seem like a faked ancestry mate, but what source have you seen that he's a jew? Because I can't find anyone else saying that.

I think Fuentes might be straight up Spanish, but regardless he is pretty clearly Criollo or close to anyway.

And NAXALT is true for any X, there are always exceptions to any rule, that doesn't make the rule useless.

Like, Rob Smith and Candace Owens exists. That doesn't mean that blacks don't vote 80-90% for dems or mean there's some massive Blexit exit to the GOP establishment imminent. (Yes, I think Smith's cringe and terrible politically, but that's not relevant)
Stephen Miller was probably one of the best people in the Trump admin, that doesn't mean jews are going to flip politically.
 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
This is true for every civilization except Western Civilization. Which is something that was built over thousands of years by everything form Aryans to Celts....All white but not all whites are created equal.

Yes but no. See 'Western Civilization' is the secularizing Whig name for Christendom. Christendom isn't Classical Civilization; Greece and Rome and the Celtoi. Christendom is the inheritor of the world of the Diadochi and the Noble Romans. Christendom is *ALSO* the inheritor of the world Wotan and Thor and the Black Forrest, of Arminius and Clovis and Charles the Hammer, of Horst and Henga, Robert the Weasel and Eric the Red, mists and castles and dragons, Beowulf and Grendel, Arthur and Roland.

To disparage the German contribution to Christendom is to attack the racial and cultural base thereof. The German tribal volkswanderung conquered from Alexandria in Aegypt to Carthage, to Rome, to Seville, West and East Frankia, and into the lands of the Kievan Russ. Goths, Franks, Lombards, Vandals, Angles, Jutes, Saxons, all Germans, and all founding stock of nearly every nation within Christendom, save only the Magyar Hungarians, Slavic Bohemians and Poles and Ruthyn, the Strange Finns and Basques, and yes, Celtic Irish and Bretons. And even in those cases, significant mixing happened, because everyone wanted that fierce steppe barbarian might on their side.

Roman Catholicism is what is, has the form that it does *because* of Charlemagne's court and the Gothic imagination that stands in awe of forests clearings and the airy Gothic cathedrals that make a forest sacred grove out of stone. I realize that these things might not stir your blood, but if you have Spanish blood they should, for the Hidalgos are themselves Visigoths who took Hispania through might and main.

Look, I say these things not to disparage the Med or the Celt, only to say the Nord is a worthy member of the family, and not a 'snow ape'. Fighting inside the family when our enemies bay for our blood is contra-indicated.

What Buchanan concedes in the name of common sense when he's the leader of the movement Fried simps too?

But you yourself say that movement fried simps are no longer sufficient. You want us snow apes to get over feeling sorry for ourselves and the 'holy other'? Well maybe stop criticizing us when we rediscover a love for our own and our own things?

High Culture comes from constant struggle or being invaded and having High culture imposed on you. Nordic people had culture imposed on them, then they fucked it up and then they had to crawl back to civilization the hard way.

False, but I've already covered that above. Further reading.

The Germanization of Christianity.
The Gospel of the Saxons.

The Holy Roman Empire was only viable during the reign of one single Barbarian king, then his descendentes fucked it up and we're right back to Germans ruining everything.

Founded Year of Our Lord 800, dissolved Year of Our Lord 1806. Not a bad run at all. Lasted longer than Byzantium managed.

...inheritors of protestant heresy and the children of the Western collapse does not make one an heir to western civilization..Which they were but not by blood and more by cultural intertia.

Ahhh, yes, *THIS* is your strongest argument, that by severing themselves from Mother Church they ceased being a member of the Mystical Body of Our Lord by their schism and thus Christendom, and thus no longer 'white' culturally. This actually sounds like an argument I should be making, as the resident radtrad ultramontanist. But 'whiteness', at least, as I understand and use the term, is more than culture, more than cult, it is a bloodline. Saying otherwise is ultimately a form of Gnosticism, that our thoughts are more important than our bodies. But we are form and matter, not just form alone.

My point was more America started as an Empire, it was never going to be anything but the inheritor of the Roman legacy. It was never a nation, it was always a prince among rabble. Whether Anglos deserved that or not can be debated...But they were what they were.

See, here I have to disagree. While America *was* founded as an Empire and contained (or as I would prefer, imprisoned) multiple Nations from the beginning, she is *NOT* the inheritor of Rome. She is the inheritor of Carthage; a sea-faring merchant power that fights using mercenaries and sacrifices her children to Moloch for prosperity. America was always a project of the Royal/Secret/Invisible College of occultic oligarchs. See Francis Bacon's New Atlantis. We shouldn't be hating the Yankee Roundheads here and now, they literally know not what their forefathers have done, and would likely recoil in horror if they did. Except the lolberts, screw those guys.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the Anglo hasn't been a force for grave ill since his schism. But he wouldn't have the power to *do* grave ill if he wasn't also capable of great good. Remember, evil has no substance of its' own and the corruption of the best is the worst.

TLDR, this meme, but cool it the anti-Anglo remarks ;)
civilization.jpg
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
"Slovenian and Basque" doesn't really seem like a faked ancestry mate, but what source have you seen that he's a jew? Because I can't find anyone else saying that.[

Not his ancestry, his religion.

Though I wonder if he believes in the Basque Seperatist bit about them being Characters from Stargate. I mean, I don't think he does because he isn't a fucking moron.

I think Fuentes might be straight up Spanish, but regardless he is pretty clearly Criollo or close to anyway.

So are most of those South American Voters some think will simp for the left and unlike him, they aren't gay furries maybe.png

Yes but no. See 'Western Civilization' is the secularizing Whig name for Christendom. Christendom isn't Classical Civilization; Greece and Rome and the Celtoi. Christendom is the inheritor of the world of the Diadochi and the Noble Romans. Christendom is *ALSO* the inheritor of the world Wotan and Thor and the Black Forrest, of Arminius and Clovis and Charles the Hammer, of Horst and Henga, Robert the Weasel and Eric the Red, mists and castles and dragons, Beowulf and Grendel, Arthur and Roland.[

I would argue that it predates Christendom, certainly Christianity united it under the umbrella of Christ and the Mother Church though. But that goes a good deal towards my point more than you'd think.

To disparage the German contribution to Christendom is to attack the racial and cultural base thereof. The German tribal volkswanderung conquered from Alexandria in Aegypt to Carthage, to Rome, to Seville, West and East Frankia, and into the lands of the Kievan Russ. Goths, Franks, Lombards, Vandals, Angles, Jutes, Saxons, all Germans, and all founding stock of nearly every nation within Christendom, save only the Magyar Hungarians, Slavic Bohemians and Poles and Ruthyn, the Strange Finns and Basques, and yes, Celtic Irish and Bretons. And even in those cases, significant mixing happened, because everyone wanted that fierce steppe barbarian might on their side.

It certainly united the fuck out of Christendom after it destroyed half of it in a welfare riot.

Roman Catholicism is what is, has the form that it does *because* of Charlemagne's court and the Gothic imagination that stands in awe of forests clearings and the airy Gothic cathedrals that make a forest sacred grove out of stone. I realize that these things might not stir your blood, but if you have Spanish blood they should, for the Hidalgos are themselves Visigoths who took Hispania through might and main.

While true, a lot of that was inhabiting the ruins of the old infrastructure. While it doesn't detract from Charlemagne's achievement by any stretch. It's not building it from scratch as oft is claimed.

Look, I say these things not to disparage the Med or the Celt, only to say the Nord is a worthy member of the family, and not a 'snow ape'. Fighting inside the family when our enemies bay for our blood is contra-indicated.

I don't disagree with you, my issue is when its said the Nord is the only one who matters and the rest of us can fuck off, when its the rest of us they need to eradicate this enemy,

But you yourself say that movement fried simps are no longer sufficient. You want us snow apes to get over feeling sorry for ourselves and the 'holy other'? Well maybe stop criticizing us when we rediscover a love for our own and our own things?

But why? I want you to get mad, its not enough that you marsh apes redpill YOU MUST RAGE PILLL...There is method to my madness.

I don't want the Saxon to learn how to be indignant, I want him to learn how to hate again. It's the only way my new home will be rid of the communist and front hole menace.

Trust in this particular spic, for he has method to his madness. 377906135971397634.png


False, but I've already covered that above. Further reading.

The Germanization of Christianity.
The Gospel of the Saxons.

Without Rome, none of that could be.
Founded Year of Our Lord 800, dissolved Year of Our Lord 1806. Not a bad run at all. Lasted longer than Byzantium managed.

The Greeks decided to negotiate with Rapists...they paid the ultimate price.

the HRE told them to go fuck themselves.

This was wise...the other stuff though? meh.

[
Ahhh, yes, *THIS* is your strongest argument, that by severing themselves from Mother Church they ceased being a member of the Mystical Body of Our Lord by their schism and thus Christendom, and thus no longer 'white' culturally. This actually sounds like an argument I should be making, as the resident radtrad ultramontanist. But 'whiteness', at least, as I understand and use the term, is more than culture, more than cult, it is a bloodline. Saying otherwise is ultimately a form of Gnosticism, that our thoughts are more important than our bodies. But we are form and matter, not just form alone.

To paraphrase a Spartan King "When they broke from the faith they broke from the polis"

I'll give protestants huugge leaps in physics though..but why the fuuuuuccckkk did they have to dabble in Ancient aliens mumbo jumbo?

I mean to be fair, Jesuits did too..but Jesuits do big brained bullshit all the time so...

]See, here I have to disagree. While America *was* founded as an Empire and contained (or as I would prefer, imprisoned) multiple Nations from the beginning, she is *NOT* the inheritor of Rome. She is the inheritor of Carthage; a sea-faring merchant power that fights using mercenaries and sacrifices her children to Moloch for prosperity. America was always a project of the Royal/Secret/Invisible College of occultic oligarchs. See Francis Bacon's New Atlantis. We shouldn't be hating the Yankee Roundheads here and now, they literally know not what their forefathers have done, and would likely recoil in horror if they did. Except the lolberts, screw those guys.

That fits England and Japan better don't you think?

America united the world with nuclear hellfire and Jesus and Rock and Roll. Which is Roman as fuck.

Carthage and England both tried with sectarianism and math and an alphabet and got cucked for their trouble. Japan did the same but with more skulls for the chrysanthemum throne. zaru.png




Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the Anglo hasn't been a force for grave ill since his schism. But he wouldn't have the power to *do* grave ill if he wasn't also capable of great good. Remember, evil has no substance of its' own and the corruption of the best is the worst.

TLDR, this meme, but cool it the anti-Anglo remarks ;)

I don't believe that can be argued against..Yes.

Also that meme makes the US look like Venice on steroids 300767289228263424.png
 
Last edited:

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
Also that meme makes the US look like Venice on steroids

Neither is that wrong to say! Venice was the OG Bankster-Merchant Sea Power parasite upon the Body of Christendom.

That fits England and Japan better don't you think?

What is Estados Unidos but Cromwell's Protectorate writ large upon the wilderness as if the wilderness was itself the Sea, or the alchemical flux, meaningless proto-matter subject to the will of the adept?

As far as Nippon goes, there certainly is a sort zivilizational rhyme going on between how Britain relates to Europe/Rome and how Nippon relates to China/Peking, if you get my Spenglerism.

To paraphrase a Spartan King "When they broke from the faith they broke from the polis"

No argument here.

But why? I want you to get mad, its not enough that you marsh apes redpill YOU MUST RAGE PILLL...There is method to my madness.

Hey, if you discover the magical technique for awaking the wraith of my snoozing Saxon brethren, please do share it? Halp, my Saxon is broken!

I don't disagree with you, my issue is when its said the Nord is the only one who matters and the rest of us can fuck off, when its the rest of us they need to eradicate this enemy,

I mean, the Italians and Irish are largely accepted on the American right as proppa men of the polis, fit to stand in the phalanx. The point of contention seems to be high caste Latinos; Criollos and Castizos, when most of our practical everyday experience is with furtive, drunk, and criminal low caste Mestizos and Indios. And since a reaction to the never ending stream of them coming across the unguarded frontier is how most normies awaken in the first place, it's a touchy subject. Another part of it is that hazing the new guy is just a part of the process. There did used to be signs that said 'Irish and Dogs not allowed' after all.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
When they captured fortified villages,they killed everybody including womans and children.For example - Mystic massacre 26.5.1637,where puritans killed all inhabitants/600-700/.Usually most were used as slaves,but not by puritans.Kanaanites must die.

Important thing is - are you going to join forces with people taking about jewish lasers to save your Republic,or choose to wait for leftist Gulag where all killed including jews would be not victim of antisemitism,but result of "people will" ?

References? Links?

Anything other than bald assertions?
 

Free-Stater 101

Freedom Means Freedom!!!
Nuke Mod
Moderator
Staff Member
Important thing is - are you going to join forces with people taking about jewish lasers to save your Republic,or choose to wait for leftist Gulag where all killed including jews would be not victim of antisemitism,but result of "people will" ?
I look at both sides of the table at the game that both sides want me to play their way, and then l promptly flip it like a boss.
 
Last edited:

Navarro

Well-known member
Let's just dissect this nonsense.

To disparage the German contribution to Christendom is to attack the racial and cultural base thereof. The German tribal volkswanderung conquered from Alexandria in Aegypt to Carthage, to Rome, to Seville, West and East Frankia, and into the lands of the Kievan Rus. Goths, Franks, Lombards, Vandals, Angles, Jutes, Saxons, all Germans, and all founding stock of nearly every nation within Christendom, save only the Magyar Hungarians, Slavic Bohemians and Poles and Ruthyn, the Strange Finns and Basques, and yes, Celtic Irish and Bretons.

It doesn't take great military skill or strength to be invited in as exchange for military service and then turn on your hosts/employers. Given that the Arabs would legitimately take military control of an even greater area scant centuries later, beating the Vandals and Visigoths and going within a hair's breadth of pwning the Franks, clearly they would be the truly superior ones under this logic. /s

And the Germanic invasions never conquered Alexandria, so you're wrong again on that count. And East Francia ( i.e. Germany) also doesn't count since it was where the Germanic hordes invaded from.

Also, random archaicisms and capitalised adjectives do not actually lend your statements any substance. Again, the layers of LARP are really just obfuscatory of the fact you have no coherent political philosophy and don't actually know what you're talking about.

Which means everything you call for is rather self-contradictory. You can't have a Carlylian absolute monarch and a powerful feudal nobility (or a strong Church), you can't have localism and a centralised command economy, you can't reject trade without committing to either isolationist poverty or rapacious imperial conquest, you can't have eugenics without abandoning traditional sexual morality.

Finally, it's odd to see you take a view of history directly derived from the 19th century German nationalists who are one of the multitudinous groups you continuously whine about having ruined everything forever (in this case, by supposedly scuppering the early 19th century Holy League). This also goes to show how you really have nothing coherent but just an assorted grab-bag of edgy ideas, just as how you complain about social-Darwinists while simultaneously adopting their fears of dysgenic apocalypse and pseudoscientific ideas of their superiority (which oddly enough always put the social-Darwinist-in-question's own nation at the very top of the hierarchy he'd constructed for himself; also, they were unquestionably leftists and socialists).

(This is especially hilarious when you look at the 19th century context in which this narrative of uber-virile racially-superior Germanic barbarians overthrowing weak puny decadent Romans came about. The people who came up with these ideas weren't friendly to the Catholic Church one bit. They ultimately took this line of thinking to its logical conclusion and abandoned Christianity altogether as a foreign import that in their minds had done nothing but weaken the "glorious Germanic conquerors".)

Not to mention how eventually some of the ideological descendants of these people got high on their own supply and decided that since their greatest achievement (in their minds) had been destroying civilisation in the 5th Century, they were going to try to do it again in the 20th.

And even in those cases, significant mixing happened, because everyone wanted that fierce steppe barbarian might on their side.

So you yourself claim significant "race mixing" occurred and involved "everyone" in the early medieval period. Which in itself rather implodes your thesis, because everyone of European descent then becomes a "mongrel" and there are no "pure stocks" that can be preserved. Which means the very basis for building an "ethnostate", as a political project, doesn't exist other than as a brute, arbitrary, exercise of tyrannical power for the sake of power.

I realize that these things might not stir your blood, but if you have Spanish blood they should, for the Hidalgos are themselves Visigoths who took Hispania through might and main.

Again, more nonsense supremacism. "You Mediterranean types are okay deep down I guess since you're GERMAN! at heart". The cringe is real.

Culture is downstream of biology though, race is not a cultural artifact, culture is a racial artifact.

Case study, Japan.

It's the seventeenth century. The Samurai are warriors fighting over domination of the lands. They're relatively pragmatic; using a variety of weapons, including guns, and fighting alongside mass armies of common-born soldiers. It's not unheard of for a commoner to rise up from the ranks and make a name as a Samurai. There are occasional invasions of Korea, but Japan doesn't really care about outsiders. There's this weird new religion that's spreading in the South though, brought by European missionaries.

Flash forward.

It's the eighteenth century. The Samurai are essentially government bureaucrats for the Shogun; it's a peaceful age, if a somewhat totalitarian one. The only real violence they're involved with are occasional honour duels. The Samurai are now strictly hereditary and have gained rather strong privileges over the commoners. The country is strictly isolationist, with foreigners that leave its closed ports or wash up on the shore. Christians are mercilessly persecuted and live in hiding.

Flash forward.

It's the late 19th century. The Samurai have just been legally abolished under Emperor Meiji -the majority respond to this by becoming businessmen, but a few launch a futile rebellion. Japan is neophiliac and expansionist - China is weak, and the European powers are threatening it. Eat or be eaten. Many people are regularly leaving the country to learn in the West and Western educators are being quickly imported to bring the country up to speed. Christians are legal again.

Flash forward.

It's the early 1940s. Japan is engaged in a world war, fighting across the Pacific. The whole population is entangled in an atmosphere of fanatical militarism. Even as defeat after defeat mounts up, they redouble their efforts, confident that with enough will to overcome the Americans they can do it. The IJA, that forty years ago was well-regarded for its good treatment of civilians and prisoners of war, is now eagerly torturing them to death. When the USA threatens to invade, high-school girls as young as fourteen grab bamboo stakes and prepare to charge the American attackers, while others prepare to throw themselves off cliffs in suicidal despair. The Samurai is an ideal of military prowess and refusal to give in, but in an odd twist have once more become "vulgarised" - Japanese NCOs carry (shitty, cheap) katanas into battle (the actual descendants of the old Samurai, BTW, are now government servants and businessmen, some are military officers). Two atom bombs go off.

Flash forward.

It's the early 21st century. Japan, while still a conservative and 'face'-based society, has turned from hyper-militarism towards hyper-pacifism. The army is unpopular and isn't even an army according to the law - a recent manga that portrayed them fighting fantasy Romans was somewhat controversial. A sense of decline and decay is permeating the atmosphere. The Samurai now only exists as an ideal of a vanished age that is aspired to not on the battlefield but in the corporate boardroom. The former members of this class have melted away into the rest of the population.

During this time period, no significant admixture or change occurred to the Japanese genepool. Meanwhile, the culture changed from warlike to peaceful to hyper-warlike to hyper-pacifist. The Samurai changed their role from warriors to bureaucrats to businessmen to ceasing to exist as a distinct class altogether. Japan was "eh" about the rest of the world (though it carried out military adventures in Korea), then deliberately forgot the rest of the world existed, then embraced neophilia, then was expansionist on a scale not before seen in that culture, then became pacifist and engaged with the outside world largely through trade.

Also: I thought you'd previously said that culture was merely the outworking of angelic "collective souls"? What's the actual answer according to you? The mystical or the biological? Does it depend on which day of the week it is?

Also, the former still has severe problems. To name just one, all cultures are fallen because they're all sinful, i.e. all of them encourage or permit sinful behaviour. If their collective souls are also fallen, as would have to logically be the case, and the collective souls are angels, then the collective souls have to be fallen angels i.e. demons. And logically the Archangel Michael, who was Israel's national angel in the OT as Daniel attests, would have to by extension to be a fallen angel i.e. a demon. There's no escape from this remorseless logic other than into a gnosticism where the soul is a pure thing unaffected by a sinful nature or the effects of sin.

And if the national angels (or demons) are the souls of groups of people, then by logical extension that must be the case for the guardian angels associated with individual persons. So the warding angels and the tempting devils become ... merely parts of ourselves, a metaphor or archetype. Feuerbach creeps in through the back (or bach) door.

Finally, if the individual is nothing but a vessel for their culture and culture is the outworking of genetics as you've both stated, what you have is pure genetic determinism as the explanation for every good and bad deed a person will ever do. Free will cannot exist without the existence of the individual capable of making moral choices. But that's what you've ever so "helpfully" have denied is a thing that exists.

And if something so diffuse and immaterial as culture is determined by biology, you've simply wholeheartedly embraced the materialist, "nominalist" anthropology you sought to avoid. But this wouldn't be the first time you castigated and fulminated against a group of people, only to repeat their arguments and claims without realising the implications.

Founded Year of Our Lord 800, dissolved Year of Our Lord 1806. Not a bad run at all. Lasted longer than Byzantium managed.

27 BC-1453 AD
324 AD-1453 AD
395 AD-1453 AD

No matter how you slice it, Byzantium still wins out.

She is the inheritor of Carthage

Impossible, as Carthage left no cultural inheritance for anyone to pick up. Vague similarities =/= "inheritance". One might as well claim that England is the inheritor of the Minoans since both countries are on islands. Not to mention your argument that culture comes from DNA ... by that reasoning, the American people would have to literally be the direct descendants of the ancient Carthaginians! This is even more absurd than I thought at first.

a sea-faring

And also a land power, and an air power, and a nuclear power. The last is the most significant. But these are not mutually exclusive. You can't have one and a half million men under arms and not be a major land power.

merchant power

Rome was also a merchant power and possessed a trade network which not only spanned the whole of Europe but also went as far afield as India and China (where notably, Carthage never reached).

Most Great Powers are also great merchant powers - but then you're so economically illiterate you think a centralised command economy is a grand idea and literally made a post which was nothing but "I hate trade!".

fights using mercenaries and

Volunteer citizen-soldier =/= mercenary. Words have meanings. The modern American soldier would be closer to a Roman legionary than a Carthaginian mercenary.

sacrifices her children to Moloch for prosperity

It's not as if infanticide was unheard of in Rome. Not to mention that abortion qua abortion was known of in the Classical world, as attested by the Didache condemning the practice as sinful and the Hippocratic oath containing the statement "I will not carry out an abortion".

America was always a project of the Royal/Secret/Invisible College of occultic oligarchs.

So now it isn't Philip the Fair that ruined everything forever, but some sort of conspiracy of alchemists. Which you have no evidence for save an obscure work of early-modern utopian fiction.

But which to you is absolute proof that a cabal of occultists were behind all the major political developments of the past 400 years. Or was it Parliament making a back-asswards play to politically embarass George III by committing an enormous amount of blood and treasure to retain the American colonies over eight years of war, a war which they overwhelmingly supported at its outset?

Neither is that wrong to say! Venice was the OG Bankster-Merchant Sea Power parasite upon the Body of Christendom.

"Standing on the naval front line against the Ottoman Empire for 200 years, preventing them from launching a serious invasion and conquest of Italy"=/= "parasitism". Again, words have meanings.

What is Estados Unidos but Cromwell's Protectorate

Nobody liked Cromwell after his death (or even during his life) until the 19th century when absolutists like you tried to claim him as a forerunner; the Founders didn't take anything from the English Interregnum (whose political structure boiled down to direct military rule) but rather looked directly to Greek and Roman political theory. Because the Commonwealth of England was despised by all who lived under it and only held in place by military force under a tyrant it thus proved evanescent and left no political legacy.

And even if this is true, why should the "Anglos" abandon their political traditions which have persisted and developed for more than eight-hundred years (and by your bizarre ideas would be directly coded into their DNA) for an abstract "Capital-T Tradition" that spits in the face of them? You can't simultaneously be a relativist and a universalist.

writ large upon the wilderness as if the wilderness was itself the Sea,

I'm sure people in the 18th century knew that land isn't water. Also, the Thirteen Colonies were far from a barren wilderness in 1776, and had a longstanding pre-existing political tradition of local self-governance.

or the alchemical flux, meaningless proto-matter subject to the will of the adept?

Again with the rambling about alchemy. This is the opposite of meaningful or coherent when it comes to discussing political thought. Not to mention that if culture (which remember, politics is downstream of) is merely the outworking of genetics there's no room for an evil conspiracy of alchemists, or Philip the Fair, to screw everything up.

As far as Nippon goes, there certainly is a sort zivilizational rhyme going on between how Britain relates to Europe/Rome and how Nippon relates to China/Peking, if you get my Spenglerism.

So where's the genetic relation to the UK? If all culture derives from genetics, similar cultures inevitably must be related directly by blood. So, Carthage, Britain/America, Venice and Japan must somehow all be close brothers genetically of each other, and the Highland Scots must be closely related to the Caucasian mountain clans and the Pashtuns as genetic isolates.

I sympathize with some of their points about degeneracy and some of their views on physical discipline and staying in shape and finding a healthy spouse etc.

But I dunno how much of that is specifically traditionalist and more common sense.

Some of what they say is common sense. But the sheer amount of nonsense it's surrounded in makes it not worth the while to take them seriously.
 
Last edited:

Free-Stater 101

Freedom Means Freedom!!!
Nuke Mod
Moderator
Staff Member
You mean you do nothing but talk on the internet while everything you care about gets eroded. Sick.
When I see you do something in RL then I will contemplate it. But until then I won't do anyone else's dirty work, least of all antisemitites like ATP is implying, I am a follower of the constitution who serves the Republic not Richard Spencer and his ilk.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
When I see you do something in RL then I will contemplate it. But until then I won't do anyone else's dirty work, least of all antisemitites like ATP is implying, I am a follower of the constitution not Richard Spencer and his ilk.
I have yet to meet anyone who likes Richard Spencer, even white nationalists lol. Also I don’t think anyone on this site holds politics that he does either. Weird that it’s antisemites that’s least of all like that’s the worst thing possible too.

Also I throw money at causes I believe in and help right wing zoomers with fitness.
 
Last edited:

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
Richard Spencer is on your side if anything.

He worked for Hilary Clinton, he's married to a black woman, he's half Mexican and he is controlled opposition and a Fed snitch.
 

Navarro

Well-known member
Richard Spencer is on your side if anything.

He worked for Hilary Clinton, he's married to a black woman, he's half Mexican and he is controlled opposition and a Fed snitch.

Hmm ... given the stated political strategy of the alt-right and adjacent ideologies (as stated by the few members along that line we have here) is literally to sit back and do nothing in the hope society collapses and they get to run around in the Mad-Maxery to their hearts' content (until a week or so later they get gunned down by another warlord gang) ... wouldn't that be an amazing boon to the left if a significant faction of the political right embraced beliefs that turned off a majority of a population while also doing literally nothing effective in actually practical politics?
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
Hmm ... given the stated political strategy of the alt-right and adjacent ideologies (as stated by the few members along that line we have here) is literally to sit back and do nothing in the hope society collapses and they get to run around in the Mad-Maxery to their hearts' content (until a week or so later they get gunned down by another warlord gang) ... wouldn't that be an amazing boon to the left if a significant faction of the political right embraced beliefs that turned off a majority of a population while also doing literally nothing effective in actually practical politics?

I think you're confusing accelerationists and Anprims with the assorted gaggle of imbeciles that constitute the Alt right and their homies.

And considering how screwed up the next two generations are, you really sure those fucked up notions aren't mainstream yet? Left and right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top