Holding anti Semitic views isn't just some minor failing. Such nonsense should be confined to the dustbin of history were it belongs. That the modern left if willing to tolerate it on their side is proof of their evil.
Jews in the United States are overwhelmingly left-wing,
for instance they generally vote democrat by margins of 70-30 favoring democrats by forty points. Despite making up only ~2% of the US population,
they supply the approximately 50% of the donations to the Democratic Party. That's a huge deal- it's entirely factual to say that without jewish donations in American politics, Republicans would lose a quarter of their cash, and democrats would lose
half. Money matters in politics- that would basically relegate democrats to a rump party. Many of those in prominent positions who support democrats and woke politics are jews- for instance,
Wolf Blitzer, prominent CNN anchor, is a jew, as is
the president of CNN, Jeff Zucker. The NYT is owned by the descendents of Adolph Ochs, primarily the Sulzberger family, including their publisher
who are jews. Alicia Garza, one of the three founders of BLM,
is a jew. George Soros, the billionaire behind the Open Society Foundation which lobbies to bring endless violent refugees into Europe, and contributor to Hope Not Hate, which seeks to dox anyone who opposes this, is a jew. Perhaps the most famous and memorable of the lot, Jeffrey Epstein, who had many connections to prominent democrats including the Clintons, and is generally believed to have been part of a ring of rich and influential pedophiles, was
also a jew, as is Ghislaine Maxwell.
Additionally, on the other side, it is notable that of the prominent jews that are on the right in the US, many of them were deeply involved with the neoconservative movement, such as
Bill Kristol and
Max Boot. Additionally, several of the prominent people who those on the right felt was giving Trump bad advice are jews, most notably Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump (Ivanka is not ethnically jewish but converted). Sheldon Adelson,
the GOP/Trump megadonor who celebrated someone who stole US secrets on behalf of a foreign nation, is also a jew.
If your central moral principle is opposition to "anti-semitism" then you will always lose, as will any right-wing movement or group that bases itself around this, not necessarily even because this is an essential part of the question but merely because if you are on the right, (even the spineless, toothless version) you are then opposing the preferences of a supermajority of jews, you are opposing the revealed prefernces-in-donations of a supermajority of jews, and you are opposing the preferences of a significant number of influential jews. So the people you are in opposition to are going to be disproportionately jews. Since the people who care a lot about what is and isn't "anti-semitic" are going to generally defer to what jews think is and isn't "anti-semitic." It's like having the guiding moral principle of your party by "anti-racism" when ~80% of blacks are against you. This goes double for anyone who is a nationalist, since many of the more prominent jews on the right are also against you. The standard response to this (since ~Buckley's time) has been to ever-more-aggressively attack anything and anyone on your own side that could be construed as anti-semitic, in order to "prove" this wrong, but unless this actually succeeds in shifting the political alignment of most jews, this is doesn't work in altering that, and it doesn't appear to succeed. It also makes you look like a huge loser because keep conspicuously trying to get with people who want nothing to do with you. And since nobody wants to back a loser, this makes you into even more of a loser.
Let's go back to MTG's remarks that were supposedly "anti-semitic" the aspect that was anti-semitic was that
she connected a rather implausible theory about how the wildfire's in California started, and said they benefitted PG&E, Solaren and Rothschild Incorporated. Because "Rothschild" is a jewish name, this was "anti-semitic." Sure, it's
kooky.
PG&E were found liable for the fires, and Solaren is a start up that does appear to be trying to
sell the idea of space-based solar panels, however they do not appear to have ever successfully produced any power and their design called for transmitting the power via radiowaves. But is it "anti-semitic?" Have you ever said that Soros was behind something? Like, for instance, say you think that
Soros is behind backing weak-on-crime DAs in a number of cities, which has the effect of increasing crime? Well, "Soros" is a jewish name too.
