Armchair General's DonbAss Derailed Discussion Thread (Topics Include History, Traps, and the Ongoing Slavic Civil War plus much much more)

Tyzuris

Primarch to your glory& the glory of him on Earth!
Russian state owned media are going full Goebbels now:

And then Russians act indignant why the civilized nations look down upon their barbaric country filled with their barbarian people who promote a shitty barbaric genocidal culture like this headed by a lowly fascist cleptokrat strongman. Russians are in some ways a backwards people more like the rapist Mongolian barbaric hordes that Genghis Khan led in their rampage across Eurasia than proper civilized Europeans in their mentality. And tv hosts like these make my argument quite aptly. No way in any decent countries with decent peoples and cultures would gross genocidal tripe like this be tolerated to be broadcasted with applauds.

The only good end for this war is that Russians get their entire conventional military wrecked leaving Russia a castrated eunuch puppy with only bark and no bite at all.
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
And then Russians act indignant why the civilized nations look down upon their barbaric country filled with their barbarian people who promote a shitty barbaric genocidal culture like this headed by a lowly fascist cleptokrat strongman. Russians are in some ways a backwards people more like the rapist Mongolian barbaric hordes that Genghis Khan led in their rampage across Eurasia than proper civilized Europeans in their mentality. And tv hosts like these make my argument quite aptly. No way in any decent countries with decent peoples and cultures would gross genocidal tripe like this be tolerated to be broadcasted with applauds.

The only good end for this war is that Russians get their entire conventional military wrecked leaving Russia a castrated eunuch puppy with only bark and no bite at all.
In fairness, the guy was actually reprimanded and removed from role, and and the channel described his behaviour as temporary insanity.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I guess that by Lula's logic Poland deserves a part of the blame for World War II breaking out since it allied with Britain, which subsequently pissed off Hitler:



I guess that Poland shouldn't have provoked Hitler like that, eh?
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Quite interesting that back in 2015 the GOP were more hawkish on Russia and Ukraine than the Democrats were:


Russia-Ukraine-Report-25.png
 

planefag

A Flying Bundle of Sticks
You keep saying this to hide the fact you're goalpost shifting from your claim they don't have advanced capabilities

He thinks an SRBM fired sideways is an "advanced capability." Phenomenal.

Except for the fact I've already linked it in others

tl;dr

So, please do explain to us how the Soviets had to wait to develop long enough strike ranges given you've already conceded they had that capability for over a decade by the time of the Walker Spy Ring in the 1980s?

history scorner read goooooooooooood:


If you're conceding they didn't pull back their first gen submarines, then that proves exactly the original point I made.

If they pulled those back they'd literally be useless by being out of range, and give away the fact that a spy ring existed to tip them off to being tailed by US attack boats.

That object permanence joke I made last time may have been overly optimistic.

Pretty clearly, you consider the existence of Soviet bastion areas a sign of weakness, which was the point I was making by pointing by bringing up the U.S. is now doing it

Bastions to protect boats near home shores that are supposed to hide on their own in the open ocean vs. area-denial/sea control enabled by forward bases for offensive purposes in hostile waters:


Lets see if you can spot the difference between these concepts.

Specifically, though, if you had bothered to read the text on your screen, you would realize the 2006 and 2015 incidents had political connotations on the part of the Chinese; they were demonstrating they could do so as a threat in response to U.S. actions elsewhere.

They were demonstrating that they could send a submarine to the AO of a US Carrier Battle Group that had been publicly announced weeks ahead of time and not get sunk by a navy that isn't actively at war with them? Wow. Much strategy. So communist. Very strong.

So, first, thanks for admitting you were wrong about the local Admiral part.

Is English your second language, by any chance?

So, Jeffery Lewis is now a journalist?

Worse. He's one of the most egregious, puffed-up circlejerking "dEfeNSe ExpErtS" among the thing-tank academics and wrote a huge self-flagellating jerk-off fanfiction about how Orange Man was Very Bad. The fact that he's a frequent go-to source for journalists is the big thick underline under his designated fuckface status. And naturally, you just beeline straight for him.

This is a categorically different system, because a fractional orbit is different than suborbital. A fractional orbit means it can stay on orbit as long as the user determines and then it de-orbits it as a part of the flight path.”

It's a satellite with a warhead on it. Wow. Oh, and it can also steer during re-entry. Like the Apollo command module or the American XB-37 drone shuttle. Which, by the way, has a payload of about 500 pounds. The B-61 nuclear bomb, complete, has a total weight of, at most, 716 pounds - shell, fins, etc. included. If you take out the physics package (the part that actually goes boom) it'd fit into an XB-37 without a problem - especially if you had no requirement for the drone to actually land intact. Bam. Fractional Orbital Bombardment with a glide vehicle that can maneuver at hypersonic speeds.

I continue to be amazed at just how easily I live in your head rent free and the amount of seething I induce is simply beautiful. Please, do continue to have your very obvious mental breakdown, because I find it absolutely hilarious.

If you think flaming someone is a "mental breakdown" you need to stop circumventing the parental access controls on your mom's iPad and get to bed, kiddo.

So, given I'm not Russian with access to a Tornado, how exactly am I supposed to do that? Matter of fact, prove to me HIMARs isn't shit.

The last confirmed deployment of Tornado munitions by Russia I saw was back in late March. Meanwhile, HIMARs be like



You know what makes HIMARs good and Tornado-S a pile of shit? HIMARs rockets actually exist in stockpile numbers greater than the single digits!

Is that why all of the Russian cruise missiles, such as Kaliber, significantly outrange it?

Why do arrows arc but bullets don't? Why do dogs bark and never meow? Why do chocolate bars taste sweet but dogshit doesn't? Why is a ballistic missile different than a cruise missile?

None of which are ground based.

It's why he has to, for example, focus in on the fact that in a list of six different missiles systems, I got one wrong

Two, actually. Note that Russia bitched and moaned about this capability for years.

Because I'm not wrong and I simply know more on the subject than all of my opponents

Okay. Tell me how you get a vehicle or missile of any sort into orbit, and how those requirements differ from what you need to get a missile/ICBM into a sub-orbital trajectory. Regale us with your keen wit and in-depth subject matter expertise. Grace us with your wisdom, sensei, for this grasshopper does not understand!

Quite interesting that back in 2015 the GOP were more hawkish on Russia and Ukraine than the Democrats were:

Since I feel this is important to re-iterate: TRUMP SOLD UKRAINE THE JAVELIN MISSILE THAT OBAMA REFUSED TO. Also this recent bombshell article from NBC News:

From Zelenskyy’s perspective — as well as that of some Eastern European governments and U.S. lawmakers from both parties — there has been repeated frustration that the Biden White House moves too slowly on weapons requests, initially hesitating to approve certain capabilities Ukraine requested most urgently, only to relent weeks or months later under pressure, according to two sources familiar with the Ukraine government’s view, congressional aides and two European officials....

Just like when they dithered for months on sending a few fucking multi-purpose helicopters because they could be used to strike the soil of a ~great power~ oh nooooo. Democrats have always been a bunch of craven little shitbags when it comes to Russia and I personally blame them in large part for this entire fucking war. Had they not been such a pack of spineless little shit-heel wimps sneering at their political opponents for daring to say Russia is the bad guy maybe Putin wouldn't have had the balls to pull this shit. Tens of thousands of dead civilians and soldiers. Tens of thousands. Because they were afraid to use rude language or do anything too gauche.
 
Last edited:

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
I guess that by Lula's logic Poland deserves a part of the blame for World War II breaking out since it allied with Britain, which subsequently pissed off Hitler:



I guess that Poland shouldn't have provoked Hitler like that, eh?
Long story short, old style anti-western leftist leader talks big and stands for empires and their "spheres of influence" because a distant empire willing to make shady deals with him is trying to assert one, while knowing that Portugal nor anyone else is coming back to do the same to his country. Wait for him to whine about colonialism when anyone in USA as much as says a bad word about his reign.
 

Batrix2070

RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
And then Russians act indignant why the civilized nations look down upon their barbaric country filled with their barbarian people who promote a shitty barbaric genocidal culture like this headed by a lowly fascist cleptokrat strongman. Russians are in some ways a backwards people more like the rapist Mongolian barbaric hordes that Genghis Khan led in their rampage across Eurasia than proper civilized Europeans in their mentality. And tv hosts like these make my argument quite aptly. No way in any decent countries with decent peoples and cultures would gross genocidal tripe like this be tolerated to be broadcasted with applauds.
The only good end for this war is that Russians get their entire conventional military wrecked leaving Russia a castrated eunuch puppy with only bark and no bite at all.
And was Moscow's beginning any different than being another horde on the steppe?
I was reminded how in the diaries and letters of the Polish period of Ivan the Terrible and his father, it was noted that they both looked different from their subjects, namely Asian.
And so they ruled.

Well, and some time ago I read a Polish article about the fact that the corpse of Ivan IV was discovered and subjected to digital reconstruction. The result was that a Tatar appeared.
What's more, there were mentions in the form that originally the title of Tsar concerned the three Khanates(sic!) and not the whole of Rus. This was introduced by Peter the Great and his title of Emperor of All-Russia.
The original symbol of the Tsar's power, the Monomakh Cap looks like the insignia of the power of the Khanates and not the Ruthenian Prince.

There were a few other important details , but this explains why there is such an old French proverb.
Scratch off a Russian and you'll find a Tartar.

Moscow, then "Russia" and then the Soviet Union was a horde in successive varieties, more or less Westernized.
It was only with the collapse of the latter that Russia collapsed socially, what we now see in Ukrania is Russia as it really is. A ruin. The scorched ruin of the former Ruthenia, and the horde built on its relativity, which took over and held that title for a while until it modernized. Then it briefly reached its peak, before the foundations, washed away by modernization, collapsed.

The sooner Russia as a whole disappears, the better it will be for the Russians themselves.

And to sum up my opinion, I believe that the subconscious for all Russians(who support the war) reason why Moscow is so eager to wipe out Ukraine, is that Ukraine along with Belarus are the only surviving fragments of the real old "Holy" Rus. Not this mockery of it in the form of Moscow.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member

Epic thread! Anyway, Russia should not have provoked Germany with its pre-WWI military buildup and especially its strategic railroad construction in Poland. Pre-WWI Germany did not have any nuclear weapons and was thus not in a situation comparable to present-day Russia. Russia should have also avoided going to war on behalf of Serbia in 1914 if it wasn't going to be capable of controlling the home front afterwards--and it wasn't! Russia had very little to gain in the event of a WWI victory anyway: Mostly some nationalistic Ukrainians and some backwards Turks, Kurds, and Armenians.

Interestingly enough, if Russians will become GAE-Lords, then they could theoretically become quite a success story if they will follow the Israeli model after getting back in good graces with the West. This means breeding a lot, promoting science and technology, relatively successfully combatting corruption, et cetera. If Russians will be GAE-Lords but will also be as prosperous as Israel per capita and also have a TFR of 3.0, comparable to that of Israeli Jews, then Russia could have an unprecedented Renaissance afterwards under the GAE umbrella.
 

King Arts

Well-known member

Epic thread! Anyway, Russia should not have provoked Germany with its pre-WWI military buildup and especially its strategic railroad construction in Poland. Pre-WWI Germany did not have any nuclear weapons and was thus not in a situation comparable to present-day Russia. Russia should have also avoided going to war on behalf of Serbia in 1914 if it wasn't going to be capable of controlling the home front afterwards--and it wasn't! Russia had very little to gain in the event of a WWI victory anyway: Mostly some nationalistic Ukrainians and some backwards Turks, Kurds, and Armenians.

Interestingly enough, if Russians will become GAE-Lords, then they could theoretically become quite a success story if they will follow the Israeli model after getting back in good graces with the West. This means breeding a lot, promoting science and technology, relatively successfully combatting corruption, et cetera. If Russians will be GAE-Lords but will also be as prosperous as Israel per capita and also have a TFR of 3.0, comparable to that of Israeli Jews, then Russia could have an unprecedented Renaissance afterwards under the GAE umbrella.
GAE?
Anyway gay rights and a high birthrate are not compatible.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
GAE?
Anyway gay rights and a high birthrate are not compatible.

GAE means the Greater American Empire. And Israel is relatively gay-friendly (it recognizes same-sex marriages performed abroad, for instance) and Israeli Jews nevertheless breed a lot.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member

Epic thread! Anyway, Russia should not have provoked Germany with its pre-WWI military buildup and especially its strategic railroad construction in Poland. Pre-WWI Germany did not have any nuclear weapons and was thus not in a situation comparable to present-day Russia. Russia should have also avoided going to war on behalf of Serbia in 1914 if it wasn't going to be capable of controlling the home front afterwards--and it wasn't! Russia had very little to gain in the event of a WWI victory anyway: Mostly some nationalistic Ukrainians and some backwards Turks, Kurds, and Armenians.

Interestingly enough, if Russians will become GAE-Lords, then they could theoretically become quite a success story if they will follow the Israeli model after getting back in good graces with the West. This means breeding a lot, promoting science and technology, relatively successfully combatting corruption, et cetera. If Russians will be GAE-Lords but will also be as prosperous as Israel per capita and also have a TFR of 3.0, comparable to that of Israeli Jews, then Russia could have an unprecedented Renaissance afterwards under the GAE umbrella.
Israel has the ultra-orthodox to boost the numbers where they are, the closest equivalent in the West would be the Amish, and Russia doesn't have anything like this, with the closest being Chechens of all people, which is a whole another can of worms.
It also won't be as prosperous due to the ridiculous corruption levels and empire problems.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Israel has the ultra-orthodox to boost the numbers where they are, the closest equivalent in the West would be the Amish, and Russia doesn't have anything like this, with the closest being Chechens of all people, which is a whole another can of worms.
It also won't be as prosperous due to the ridiculous corruption levels and empire problems.

Russia apparently has some breeders up north:


That said, though, in Israel, even secular people are relatively fertile, with them having around two children on average while moderately religious people have something like three children on average, IIRC.
 

Vaermina

Well-known member
Quite interesting that back in 2015 the GOP were more hawkish on Russia and Ukraine than the Democrats were:


Russia-Ukraine-Report-25.png
They still are, Democrats just like to try and claim otherwise because it's now politically expedient to do so.
 

Batrix2070

RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
Which ones?
The so-called homo sovieticus, today's euroticus. Popularly called the liberal opposition. In reality, they are a bunch of colonial sergeants ready to serve any foreigner because Poland is savages.
No, this is not a joke, they really have such a bent mentality. They consider themselves fighters for liberation from the PiS dictatorship, in fact they would be the first to introduce it in Poland again.
In terms of behavior, they are no different from the Russians, which is not surprising at all, many of them are descendants or further living members of the Red elite.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top