D
Deleted member 16
Guest
Thanks for that correction. Is he mistaken about the voting machines processing rate? As honestly I don’t really care about voter turnout vs expected voter numbers, there are any number of reasons for those to be weird and are not the writer’s area of expertise. I do want to know if more votes were registered then is mechanically possible. As the writer is claiming to be a voting machine systems expert that is well within his claims of expertise.
That is something that leads to an easy yes or no. If he is correct in his description of the machines in question and they did register much more votes then is physically possible then fraud is the only answer. It would be like ten people claiming to count a hundred thousand ballots by hand in an hour.
Possibly due to the aforementioned error, courts have not found most of the claims claims credible enough thus far to act. There have been other defects in the legal cases brought thus far.