LordsFire
Internet Wizard
Really? How can you look at the post immediately before yours and not think this is a clear case of attempted deflection by spurious comparison. I.e. whataboutism.
EDIT; I'd also point out that I did in fact answer the question, further down in the post you quoted.
Now, I've played your silly game, perhaps you'll do me the equal kindness of explaining how that has any bearing on the value of the post I responded to as evidence, or the broader topic of election fraud and integrity?
- AFAIK, that isn't the official party line.
- I don't believe all republicans or conservatives are racist, or even that the majority are. I do believe that racism is more prevalent in those groups than in democrats and progressive groups, or in a random sample of the population.
- My belief is informed practically not at all by what democrats say. Rather, as in many large issues where data is incomplete and hard to get, I'm informed by personal experience and anecdote. For example, practically every example of comparing Obama to a monkey was conservative. The huge majority of examples of usage for "sand nigger" are conservative (Yes, there's one dramatic counter example but that doesn't really change the preponderance.) Even this site itself has a thread that could appropriately be renamed "What's so wrong with jew-bashing anyway?" and dozens of other examples of racism dressed up as "pro-white" rather than anti-other. Even people saying that it is true to say they're racist, but that there's nothing wrong with that and that their preferred defence against accusations of such is to say "So what?" That stands in stark contrast to what one finds on more left leaning or apolitical sites.
It's not a silly game.
It's showed me that yes, you do actually have at least some internal consistency on this, which means that while I think you're wrong, I can at least have some respect for your judgement.
One of the most common things I find in leftist and leftist-leaning people, is that their worldview is basically informed by completely uncritical acceptance of the narrative pushed by Democrats, and automatic rejection of any and everything said by conservatives.
IE, starting from the assumption that leftists are always acting in good faith, and rightists are always acting in bad faith. When someone is operating on those assumptions, you cannot reason with them. I can't even tell you how many hours of my life I've wasted trying to reason with someone, only to find out that their position ultimately devolves to 'CNN says' or 'X Democrat says' or 'The Southern Poverty Law Center says.'
The reason I asked the question of you in the first place, is because yes, 'some rando on Twitter says' isn't a good standard of 'proof.' It's a fair objection to have. If you were only going to have that objection when it suited your purposes though, it wouldn't actually count as a standard.
That established, what do you think that things such as the Maricopa County election records 'going missing' signify?