This is the best argument tbqh. I generally don't support expelling people from their homes. But all of that other stuff is a bit shakier since again while there were Jewish people that lived there for thousands of years many of them haven't and came from elsewhere. Just because a country has Christians living there for a long time does not mean all Christians worldwide have a claim to it.
It depends on the moral standard we are using. Under traditional Judaism and Islam killing someone for their name is usually considered murder and wrong. Now you can kill someone for other reasons like blasphemy or idol worship under those religions which I may or may not fall under. But I was responding to someone who I thought was an atheist. So under atheism no there is nothing wrong with gay sex, there is nothing wrong with criminalizing gay sex, there is nothing wrong with killing King Arts because he is King Arts, there is nothing wrong with grooming. Nihlism is the logical end point. You run into the Is Ought fallacy.
Do you think
@SoliFortissimi is a leftist? Again he seemed to have argued for standard capitalist policies including bringing in migrants to lower wages because it would be good for bussiness. That's not a leftist/socialist position thats closer to libertarian. I tagged him because I don't know well enough if he is libertarian or not so if he wants to clarify or say I'm wrong he can do that.
I'm not really good with Math so I don't know. Now I do know that religious just need to accept one axium. That God the omnipotent creator of all exists. If that is true he is able to define morality in an objective manner. God's opinion matters because God's opinion is what created the physical laws of the universe like gravity, that is God's opinion if he wanted it to stop it would no longer be a law. So he can make objective moral laws or change them, because God is unbound by logic. For example people die when they are killed, an omnipotent God can make it so that does not happen.
That works for Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. For Buddhism it would provide morality because you wanting to avoid the cycle of rebirth, or wanting a better life. Atheism, and nihlism provides none of that, the NAP does not give rewards or a reason to accept it.
You seem to not be understanding it. No they aren't doing human sacrifice, they are doing the legal punishment for someone who violates God's commands.
1. I gave the example of universality and pedos to illustrate a point. Again why would protecting the young of a foreign group matter to you? But getting off track, unlike in Christianity with it's natural law traditional Judaism and Islam don't have a problem with people abusing children as long as those children are wives or slaves. So for them they don't see a problem with a man marrying a young girl just like you don't see a problem with a man marrying a man. You both hate what the other sees as ok. And for proof I don't need to prove anything about Islam since we all know about a certain prophet's tastes. As for Judaism while traditionally Jews are considered adults at 12 for girls and 13 for boys. With the father's permission a girl can be married younger. And I can find Bible verses in the old testament about slavery and polygamy if you want it.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
2. Again what you see as evil and what they see as evil are completely different. For many traditional cultures blasphemy or idolatry and apostasy are the worst things you can do. So it's not inconceivable that certain groups may see sodomy as worse than murder. As for your argument about repentance yes these people would want people to stop sinning and join their religion but two things first Islam is not Christianity. Christianity is much more forgiving. As far as I know Islam only gives one "wipe the slate clean" thing and that is to converts. So a former homosexual who is not a Muslim after they become a Muslim then their previous sins would be forgiven and should not be held against them. But again Islam and Judaism are more legalistic than Christianity so future sins are considered as crimes. Though I don't know about Judaism and how past sins of converts work I'd ask
@Cherico
and
@GoldRanger
Can you guys talk about converts to Judaism please?