Immigration and multiculturalism news

So uhh, British government has swapped from "INFINITE MIGRANTS!" to "INFINITE MIGRANTS!".

I know london is already minority-british, but exactly how much does the overall population have to change before the country itself needs a new name?

I propose Britainstan but that's awfully predictable.
Londoners are calling London "Londonistan" now. The people up in Westminster have no clue how much sheer hatred and outright racism is brewing towards migrants, Muslims, and Pakistanis in the UK.
 
Demographics.
Young lesbian women in UK, what do you think are the chances they vote for an anti-migrant party?
What anti-migrant party? The anti-immigration parties are a fringe in Canada. Odds are that even the most red blooded men in Canada voted for the immigration positive parties, with the differences only being in degrees.
 
So uh.

Any theories as to why women absolutely adore immigrants despite the fact they universally come from countries which treat women like actual property?
Women are overwhelmingly conformists.
"Society" (tech carterls and TV) say that migrants are to be worshipped. so they worship migrants.

Women act as amplifiers. and then weak men (simps) amplify what the women say.
 
Women are overwhelmingly conformists.
"Society" (tech carterls and TV) say that migrants are to be worshipped. so they worship migrants.

Women act as amplifiers. and then weak men (simps) amplify what the women say.
Also, ironically, a lot of the more outspoken feminists tend to secretly want the "bad boys" which treat them like utter shit, and migrants, coming from cultures that basically see women one level above cattle, fit their fetishes to a T, alongside Chads, Tyrones, and Juans.
 
most immigrants are men who then compete for those women, if most immigrants were women they'd be xenophobes.
Wasn’t something like that happened in Sweden or Norway?
Can confirm.
Swedish men were importing Thai brides by the truckload, causing the majority-female government to immediately cancel all Thailand immigration permits.

...

While allowing violent african and arab thugs to arrive in higher numbers, of course!
 
But we do want that? It's we who stand against the welfare bloat and other dependent creating policies while the Bible thumpers are busy demanding tax free status for their Megachurches even as their pastors live in expensive mansions with the tithes of their sheep.

However, as I previously noted, all citizens are entitled to protection. The glee over these women getting beaten just because they're homosexuals is....disturbing. And makes one realize, once again, why Conservatives are getting blasted across the Western world.
WTF are you talking about? You the fiscal conservatives don't give, you want to take as much as possible and give as little as possible. And guess what the dam is breaking the social conservatives are getting tired of your bullshit because you don't want to give us our social policies and you are greedy with money so you don't pay off those on "your side" you horde money or at most give it to just the politicos.

Also stop changing the topic this isn't about "wellfare bloat" or fical policy this is about social policy immigration and women's rights.

You want to let women have protections and privleges that men don't have. What do you give men in trade for being ok with this?
 
You want to let women have protections and privleges that men don't have. What do you give men in trade for being ok with this?
Very well, then I'll talk about social policies.

Women should have no protections that men don't have. I don't want to see other men murdered or raped any more than I want to see women. I'm even in support of common sense prison reform to prevent prison rapes.

And of course, I've made my opinion on sexual abuse in Churches very clear.

But nevertheless, I'm a man. I have a natural psychological aversion to watching women get beaten up by men. Nothing you can do about it.
 
You got a source for that?
IIRC they also tried to stop them from getting in, in the first place, but it was cancelled because everyone laughed at them for the clowns they are.

Tl;Dr
If Ahmed or Tyrone stabs a family they are not deported, but if someone's Thai bride divorces their husband within 2 years they're deported.

Because that 5'2 asian lady is more dangerous to Swedish women, than any violent thug.
 
IIRC they also tried to stop them from getting in, in the first place, but it was cancelled because everyone laughed at them for the clowns they are.

Tl;Dr
If Ahmed or Tyrone stabs a family they are not deported, but if someone's Thai bride divorces their husband within 2 years they're deported.

Because that 5'2 asian lady is more dangerous to Swedish women, than any violent thug.
The article has nothing about banning immigration permits, which was what you claimed.

So once again, source?
 
The article has nothing about banning immigration permits, which was what you claimed.

So once again, source?
I mean, I was recollecting shit off memory? This isn't reddit, yelling "SAUCE PLZ" doesn't mean anything.

I think you have the sites mixed up.

The ultimate argument is that Sweden is more afraid of small petite asian ladies, than thuggish third worlders.

Which that link proves.
 
I mean, I was recollecting shit off memory? This isn't reddit, yelling "SAUCE PLZ" doesn't mean anything.

I think you have the sites mixed up.

The ultimate argument is that Sweden is more afraid of small petite asian ladies, than thuggish third worlders.

Which that link proves.
All it proves is that:
1. You love making unsourced and extraordinary claims and expecting us to take them as gospel out of good old "it isn't true, but I wish it was".
2. That Sweden is serious about preventing the phenomenon of mail order brides, but deeply unserious about how to accomplish the same.

Neither of which is news. By those same standards, one might as well just repeat that "native children mass graves" hoax and demand everyone take it as seriously as they did your claim.

You're just spreading rage bait. Which admittedly works like a charm, but should be called out as such.
 
All it proves is that:
1. You love making unsourced and extraordinary claims and expecting us to take them as gospel out of good old "it isn't true, but I wish it was".
2. That Sweden is serious about preventing the phenomenon of mail order brides, but deeply unserious about how to accomplish the same.

Neither of which is news. By those same standards, one might as well just repeat that "native children mass graves" hoax and demand everyone take it as seriously as they did your claim.

You're just spreading rage bait. Which admittedly works like a charm, but should be called out as such.
bait.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top