Most absurd weapons in scifi

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
In honor of the release of the new Star Wars movie Final Trailer (in which we see at least one of these spacecraft)... let us celebrate the debut of the much beloved Resistance Bomber...


The MG-100 Star Fortress was apparently designed by a company known as Slayn & Korpil which made the second best bomber in the Star Wars canon, B-Wing. It is also known as the B/SF-17 Heavy Bomber... get it?

Now in a direct comparison to the B-Wing we can see how much better the Star Fortress actually is.

Payload:
The B-Wing can only deploy an anemic 12 proton torpedos
The MG-100 can deploy over ONE THOUSAND proton bombs

That's all you really need to know... With over a hundred times the destructive firepower of the much vaunted B-Wing, it is no surprise that the Resistance adopted an entire fleet of Heavy Bombers instead of B-Wings... or Y-Wings... or those Legendsdary K-Wings.

There are only some minor drawbacks to the MG-100 Star Fortress. Unlike the B-Wing which only requires a single pilot, the MG-100 requires a minimum of three crewmembers plus an extra two if you want to man the defensive laser cannons. Oh yeah... that's right... the B-Wing has almost the same armament level as the MG-100 but with the ability to be equipped simultaneously with a variety of ion cannons, laser cannons, blaster cannons and proton torpedo launchers the B-Wing is infinitely more versatile.

Also the B-Wing possesses a long range phased tachyon array complimented by a short range targeting grid, a targeting computer, holographic imaging, and a flight control and avionics system originally designed for small capital ships thus allowing it to engage enemy starships at range.

However the B-Wing does have some notable weaknesses. It is a very poor dogfighter and despite possessing a strong hull compared to Y-Wing's and a shield comparable if not superior to X-Wings, often requires an escort on its attack runs. It was also very expensive to manufacture.

Thankfully the MG-100 covered all of those weaknesses. By eschewing most of the avionics and targeting systems, the MG-100 merely has to fly over a target and using a simple bomb sights, dead drop a thousand proton bombs upon its target on a flyover, simplifying the process and no doubt reducing cost and flight crew training.

Also while the B-Wing has a powerful four thruster engine designed for a light freighter, the Star Fortress added two more thrusters which unfortunately only allow it a much slower acceleration and combat speed and very limited maneuverability. Also its shields and hull design leave it extremely vulnerable to enemy turrets and starfighters as an errant burst of laser cannons can detonate the proton payload.

However this can all be mitigated by simply flying in a box formation... or as seen in The Last Jedi a loose staggered line formation and escorted by a random swarm of X-Wing starfighters and far faster A-Wing interceptors. In this "box" formation the laser cannons combined with the escort fighters will protect the bombers during their slow linear bombing run which will take them directly over a vulnerable sweet spot on the enemy target.

GGWP enemies of the #resistance
 
Last edited:

BF110C4

Well-known member
In honor of the release of the new Star Wars movie Final Trailer (in which we see at least one of these spacecraft)... let us celebrate the debut of the much beloved Resistance Bomber...


The MG-100 Star Fortress was apparently designed by a company known as Slayn & Korpil which made the second best bomber in the Star Wars canon, B-Wing. It is also known as the B/SF-17 Heavy Bomber... get it?

Now in a direct comparison to the B-Wing we can see how much better the Star Fortress actually is.

Payload:
The B-Wing can only deploy an anemic 12 proton torpedos
The MG-100 can deploy over ONE THOUSAND proton bombs

That's all you really need to know... With over a hundred times the destructive firepower of the much vaunted B-Wing, it is no surprise that the Resistance adopted an entire fleet of Heavy Bombers instead of B-Wings... or Y-Wings... or those Legendsdary K-Wings.

There are only some minor drawbacks to the MG-100 Star Fortress. Unlike the B-Wing which only requires a single pilot, the MG-100 requires a minimum of three crewmembers plus an extra two if you want to man the defensive laser cannons. Oh yeah... that's right... the B-Wing has almost the same armament level as the MG-100 but with the ability to be equipped simultaneously with a variety of ion cannons, laser cannons, blaster cannons and proton torpedo launchers the B-Wing is infinitely more versatile.

Also the B-Wing possesses a long range phased tachyon array complimented by a short range targeting grid, a targeting computer, holographic imaging, and a flight control and avionics system originally designed for small capital ships thus allowing it to engage enemy starships at range.

However the B-Wing does have some notable weaknesses. It is a very poor dogfighter and despite possessing a strong hull compared to Y-Wing's and a shield comparable if not superior to X-Wings, often requires an escort on its attack runs. It was also very expensive to manufacture.

Thankfully the MG-100 covered all of those weaknesses. By eschewing most of the avionics and targeting systems, the MG-100 merely has to fly over a target and using a simple bomb sights, dead drop a thousand proton bombs upon its target on a flyover, simplifying the process and no doubt reducing cost and flight crew training.

Also while the B-Wing has a powerful four thruster engine designed for a light freighter, the Star Fortress added two more thrusters which unfortunately only allow it a much slower acceleration and combat speed and very limited maneuverability. Also its shields and hull design leave it extremely vulnerable to enemy turrets and starfighters as an errant burst of laser cannons can detonate the proton payload.

However this can all be mitigated by simply flying in a box formation... or as seen in The Last Jedi a loose staggered line formation and escorted by a random swarm of X-Wing starfighters and far faster A-Wing interceptors. In this "box" formation the laser cannons combined with the escort fighters will protect the bombers during their slow linear bombing run which will take them directly over a vulnerable sweet spot on the enemy target.

GGWP enemies of the #resistance

Let me guess, the original designers are fans of millenia old movies like Menphis Belle or the Mighty Eight and decided to create a bomber to conmemorate those classics movies and since they couldn't secure funding to create some sweet 1-1 models they raided the company's funds and then made a weapon system that showed all the conceptual weaknesses of the WWII heavy bombers, and few of its virtues, then sell it to the Resistance Navy that is in such a need of space worthy attack fighters they cannot say no even to a machine that is certain doom for the crew.

Hell, I bet the only reason they are useful in battle against warships is that the gunners are laughing so hard they cannot aim their AAA
 
Last edited:

BF110C4

Well-known member
Because space is an ocean with battleships, and bombers that drop bombs on things...
And even in WWII linear bombing of warships was deemed as obsolete and only used as a distraction against merchant ships when there was no option.

If they wanted to emulate a WWII attack in a space ocean at least use torpedo and dive bombers and limit the B-17 against actual ground targets.
 
Last edited:

Navarro

Well-known member
And even in WWII linear bombing of warships was deemed as obsolete and only used as a distraction against merchant ships when there was no option.

If they wanted to emulate a WWII attack in a space ocean at least use torpedo and dive bombers and limit the B-17 against actual ground targets.

What makes it worse is that Star Wars already has an analogue to the torpedo bombers of WW2.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Oh that's a good point. Another absurd weapon from Sci-Fi, Matthew Lillard's portrayal of Maniac from the much lauded 1999 film Wing Commander.



Maybe not a strictly defined weapon, but certainly quite painful even when poorly directed. ;)
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Where did the gravity come from to make that wreck tip over the side? Oh right, it’s the 1999 wing commander, even the best scene is mind-numbing.
 

BF110C4

Well-known member
Where did the gravity come from to make that wreck tip over the side? Oh right, it’s the 1999 wing commander, even the best scene is mind-numbing.
That's a common problem with most live action movies done in space, the lack of budget to show proper zero-g permeates into the thinking of the writers who think that if they are forced to handwave the use of normal gravity inside a ship they have to act as if gravity outside would act just as it would in Earth, making the kind of mistakes sci-fi fans realize the moment they happen.
 

AndrewJTalon

Well-known member
Founder
This:

ga-boxingglovearrowan11.jpg


Look, I love Green Arrow (Well, DCAU Green Arrow), but this? This is just... Ugh.
 

BF110C4

Well-known member
This:

ga-boxingglovearrowan11.jpg


Look, I love Green Arrow (Well, DCAU Green Arrow), but this? This is just... Ugh.
The glove must be hell in keeping the arrow flying straight to the target, wind resistance must be also detrimental to the speed and therefore how hard it hits. Frankly it wouldn't surpise me that it floats like a brick and hits like a feather.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Buraq.jpg


So it's called the Buraq and it looks neat enough. But it's a Battlesuit. Which means it's like an exoskeleton.

But it's also a Quadriped.

So...

I mean I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable placement for the operator but at face value...

I mean it looks really uncomfortable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top