Can you explain what you mean more? I'm confused what you're attempting to argue for or against here.
Like I said upthread though, it's really a question of why do this? If they take bankruptcy, the Federal Government losses all that money anyway since they held the overwhelming majority of Student Loan Debt. How about the Federal Government forgives the debt and this prevents anybody from having to take the hit of bankruptcy? In either proposed scenario, the Federal Government is going to take a loss, so why not pick the option that helps students at least?
I'm kind of on the side of "neither one," rather than one or the other.
I was saying up thread that allowing bankruptcy on student loans will never happen because too many people would choose to file bankruptcy. I use myself as an example. I probably would. This is not a good thing.
See, I can pay it. I made the decision to take on that debt, and I can pay it. It would be nice to not have to, and I'd jump on the chance, and so would lots of other people. That's why it isn't a viable option.
Neither is outright loan forgiveness.
Now, I am okay with programs to make it more affordable. Maybe some companies won't make as much, but it's a middle ground. Right now there's a decent program that matches your payments to a percentage of your income. That's not a bad compromise. You might even end up paying less than your interest, causing the loan to continually grow, but there's a compromise of a forgiveness program too, where after 20 years of payments, the remainder is forgiven. So you could make affordable payments for 20 years, and then the loan is gone, even if it actually grew in size during those years.
So it's not a total loss to the loan companies, the government, or the schools, and it's not that terrible on the loan receiver either.
I'm open to tweaks and changes. I'm also open to ideas to lower tuition and prevent future generations from picking up this kind of insane debt. But outright forgiveness or allowing massive waves of bankruptcy go too far.