PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
It's a clear case of using the justicial process as punishment.
The judicial system is intended to punish people, along with deterring and reforming them.It's a clear case of using the justicial process as punishment.
Yes, but normally you're supposed to be found guilty to be punished. Using the expense and hassle of defending yourself as a punishment in itself isn't how it's supposed to be.The judicial system is intended to punish people, along with deterring and reforming them.
No, the prison is supposed to punish people, the judicial process is supposed to discover if a person needs to be punished.The judicial system is intended to punish people, along with deterring and reforming them.
No, the prison is supposed to punish people, the judicial process is supposed to discover if a person needs to be punished.
Sort of true, I should have said the legal system to encompass prison and other elements. The judiciary can level punitive fines and issue various orders which could also be seen as a form of punishment.No, the prison is supposed to punish people, the judicial process is supposed to discover if a person needs to be punished.
In that sense, you could consider the judicial system burdensome on everyone who's charged with anything, guilty and innocent alike. To have a point, I'd think you'd have to prove that there couldn't possibly be a legal case in this instance and the action is taken purely to cause trouble without an expectation of success.Yes, but normally you're supposed to be found guilty to be punished. Using the expense and hassle of defending yourself as a punishment in itself isn't how it's supposed to be.
No, I don't think so. I'm perfectly capable of commenting on a message board that you should be innocent until proven guilty, and then going back to drawing a Zeppelin flying dinosaurs, and leaving the filing of briefs to the professionals.In that sense, you could consider the judicial system burdensome on everyone who's charged with anything, guilty and innocent alike. To have a point, I'd think you'd have to prove that there couldn't possibly be a legal case in this instance and the action is taken purely to cause trouble without an expectation of success.
If you actually can do that, perhaps you ought to be filing an amicus brief to exonerate the poor guy rather than wasting your time here?
Whelp... I'm tentatively sorry to hear about your own experience, but honestly kinda agree on the rest. I don't think it's possible to have a system that's entirely perfect, but I do think significant improvement on the present system are possible.No, I don't think so. I'm perfectly capable of commenting on a message board that you should be innocent until proven guilty, and then going back to drawing a Zeppelin flying dinosaurs, and leaving the filing of briefs to the professionals.
I do indeed consider that the judicial system is burdensome on everybody charged with anything. I've been in it's crosshairs for specious reasons before and only escaped due to copious use of money. I can therefore judge by experience that it's unfair to people who don't have copious amounts of money to spend and can agitate for it's reform without actually being a lawyer. Personally I think lawyers should all be pro-bono* and defense selected by something akin to a lottery to avoid the wealthy being able to avoid better law than the poor.
*lawyers that deal with criminal charges that is, it should be fine to charge people wanting their wills made or rental agreements drawn up, etc.
People seem to keep forgetting that according to the left, the rules do not apply to them, or at least not in the same way.Pretty sure this is all covered by the first ammendment.
But if that precident is created well the tech companies are even more blantantly guilty of that.
People seem to keep forgetting that according to the left, the rules do not apply to them, or at least not in the same way.
And how is that accomplished when no one is holding them accountable?
This looks like a fragment from some other discussion.
It is, it was split from another thread.
An on topic, taking over education and law system is basically what Left has always tried to do: they impose their standards and make anything approaching sanity essentially illegal. And since courts are there to enforce law... well, you get the picture.
It is, it was split from another thread.
An on topic, taking over education and law system is basically what Left has always tried to do: they impose their standards and make anything approaching sanity essentially illegal. And since courts are there to enforce law... well, you get the picture.
The left only values equality and they have pretty much made a cult around it.
Well, they say they do, but their version of that always seems to go in the direction of "All are Equal, but Some are More Equal Than Others".
Lol! America was built on a foundation of freedom? They certainly turned that way over time but the initial work, the actual foundation on which the country was built, was the work of the British colonisers. The subjects of the British Empire, who achieved the success they did because people, materials and wealth were provided by a decidedly unfree form of government and society.-Snip-
Goveernment systems based on a foundation of liberty can boast of several successful nations including situations where they had useless rocks in the middle of nowhere which became successful merchant kingdoms or empires one of these examples being the unites states of america.
-Snip-