Military US Military Is Scared Americans Won't Fight For Globalism

Yeah, there's laws that prohibit manufacture of certain military equipment and items outside of the US. While the Federal government certain did things to enable offshoring, and the MIC has done shady shit in the past, hollowing out the private industry sector isn't something the MIC wanted, encouraged, nor enabled. In fact, the MIC has been complaining about the offshoring of a lot things because it actually makes their ability to maintain their supply chains as well as reducing the number of skilled industrial labor in the US they need to draw from.

Remember: Clinton hated the Military and the MIC. It wasn't until Obama that the MIC started leaning towards Democrats and wokeness, which happened in large part because Obama purposefully politicized procurement and the military in ways to reward Dem patrons and punish Republican leaning corporations.

But enabling offshoring and the government structures put in place to do that? That was all set up under Clinton.

I haven't looked into it, but it sounds plausible. As recently as Bush there was at least some Republican connection to the military. Its always a bit tempting to think how things are now has been how its always been.
 
Actually a lot is done by hand.
And a good mix.
It does go to a lot of US jobs as we have had to revamp a lot kf production for arms, increasing American work load.




They also seem.tp think everyone is infantry and is going to be put into the trenches to die.

90% if the military is not combat arms but everything supporting them. Sure we may face combat every now and then, but we arnt the ones who will be sent to fight fight.


Edit: military student loan forgiveness is permanent while Bidens is temporary.
And I get 100% free college or even a trade.
Freeze the funds of any university who hosts people who fly Hamas flags for anti-terrorism reasons and any university that works with illegal immigrants under immigration laws. Any campus that hosted BLM events directly funded Hamas via BLM, remember, and now it's open season on them.

Use the Islamist infiltration of the woke circles to get the public on board with seizing their funding to pay off student loans, instead of trying to make it so only public/military service gets real loan forgiveness.

The education cartels mostly exist to sell each other's books, nothing more or less, but they try to dress it up and disguise it because hoodwinking the unwashed masses is a private, or not so private sometimes, pleasure of most progressive/leftist academia and social society.

Also, penalize universities that force non-degree/employment focused electives on students just to keep failing, and frankly usually needless, depts afloat instead of axing them from the the campus budget and offerings.
 
those polititions are the reason why life in the military is such a shit show, why our veterans get shit on after risking their lives for this country, and why we keep losing wars. The fish rots from the head my friend.
VA and DoD are separate of each other is also am ossue
 
VA and DoD are separate of each other is also am ossue

The DOD and VA are not the problem persay its our lets face it rather incopetant political class.

I'm not blaming you for that issue by the way that isn't your fault, but they are poisoning the waters your swimming in, and things are not going to get better until their replaced with some one who doesn't suck at their jobs.
 
The DOD and VA are not the problem persay its our lets face it rather incopetant political class.

I'm not blaming you for that issue by the way that isn't your fault, but they are poisoning the waters your swimming in, and things are not going to get better until their replaced with some one who doesn't suck at their jobs.
I know man.
The military has a lot to offer but politicians don't know how to not fuck things up.
Quickest way to fix the military? War.
Has always been the key
 
those polititions are the reason why life in the military is such a shit show, why our veterans get shit on after risking their lives for this country, and why we keep losing wars. The fish rots from the head my friend.

True, but people here are acting as though it's the military's fault that politicians are dicking them around.
 
Or that the military are robots or meat sacks to go die, or all infantry
Let me quote you one of my fave historians and diplomats, (and a huuge player in the blob/deep state.):

quote-military-men-are-just-dumb-stupid-animals-to-be-used-as-pawns-in-foreign-policy-henry-a-kissinger-39-91-50.jpg


:ROFLMAO:
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I know man.
The military has a lot to offer but politicians don't know how to not fuck things up.
Quickest way to fix the military? War.
Has always been the key
See, what you mean by 'fix' and what civies mean by 'fix' are likely separate things.

Also, if we cannot unfuck our military/political/social relationship in peace time, what in the world makes you think trying to get the US into an official shooting war, with that same leadership in charge, is going to actually make anything better?

I mean your answer to pretty much any issue of social strife in the US is 'we need a war', and then you assume said war would 'fix' things at home.
 
I know man.
The military has a lot to offer but politicians don't know how to not fuck things up.
Quickest way to fix the military? War.
Has always been the key
Not really. War actually helps to hide corruption because it can always be pointed to as the more important thing that needs to be taken care of first before dealing with anything else.
 
Not really. War actually helps to hide corruption because it can always be pointed to as the more important thing that needs to be taken care of first before dealing with anything else.
It tends to help the US military.
Because we focus on having lower loses over higher ones.
If someone causes more deaths than it is taken care of.
 
What an elitist asshole
I think his time in the US military as a sort of colleague to Zach might have shaped some of that preservative. :ROFLMAO:
But I don't see Zach running a whole German city for some reason.:sneaky:

Humor aside, he was a pretty good diplomatic historian, to the point where his thesis dealing with either the fallout and diplomacy after and during the Napoleonic Wars was so lengthy Harvard had to put in a rule capping the maximum at less than what he wrote.

This is very much like great powers and would be empires have operated for a long, long while.
For most of history warfare was basically the Clausewitzian "politics/diplomacy by other means", and the participants were basically pawns in the hands of the rulers and deep state equivalents back then.

To be sure, there were also wars for religion, wars for conquest, wars for prestige, and wars for other silly reason, but more often than not there were other motivators as well.


Too bad most people nowadays are historically illiterate.
 
I think his time in the US military as a sort of colleague to Zach might have shaped some of that preservative. :ROFLMAO:
But I don't see Zach running a whole German city for some reason.:sneaky:

Humor aside, he was a pretty good diplomatic historian, to the point where his thesis dealing with either the fallout and diplomacy after and during the Napoleonic Wars was so lengthy Harvard had to put in a rule capping the maximum at less than what he wrote.

This is very much like great powers and would be empires have operated for a long, long while.
For most of history warfare was basically the Clausewitzian "politics/diplomacy by other means", and the participants were basically pawns in the hands of the rulers and deep state equivalents back then.

To be sure, there were also wars for religion, wars for conquest, wars for prestige, and wars for other silly reason, but more often than not there were other motivators as well.


Too bad most people nowadays are historically illiterate.
I mean even Hitler was instrumental in founding Volkswagen, the autobahn and animal welfare/rights among other things for Christ sake so none of this does anything to change my view on him
 
I think his time in the US military as a sort of colleague to Zach might have shaped some of that preservative. :ROFLMAO:
But I don't see Zach running a whole German city for some reason.:sneaky:

Humor aside, he was a pretty good diplomatic historian, to the point where his thesis dealing with either the fallout and diplomacy after and during the Napoleonic Wars was so lengthy Harvard had to put in a rule capping the maximum at less than what he wrote.

This is very much like great powers and would be empires have operated for a long, long while.
For most of history warfare was basically the Clausewitzian "politics/diplomacy by other means", and the participants were basically pawns in the hands of the rulers and deep state equivalents back then.

To be sure, there were also wars for religion, wars for conquest, wars for prestige, and wars for other silly reason, but more often than not there were other motivators as well.


Too bad most people nowadays are historically illiterate.
could be true - but considering was dump stupid animal which saved China from soviets and tried to save soviet from collapse,i do not care about opinions of such idiot.

Becouse,if Soviets burned china in 1969,they would fall 10 years earlier,and if soviets survived in 1991 we would have war in Europe 10 years ago.

I have notching against smart genociders,but Kissinger was stupid genocider - thanks to him his country almost ceased to exist.

Idiot forget,that communism is religion,and war of soviets and Mao was war of religions,and had notching to do wit balance of power.

P.S Merry Christmas !
 
Last edited:
could be true - but considering was dump stupid animal which saved China from soviets and tried to save soviet from collapse,i do not care about opinions of such idiot.

Becouse,if Soviets burned china in 1969,they would fall 10 years earlier,and if soviets survived in 1991 we would have war in Europe 10 years ago.

I have notching against smart genociders,but Kissinger was stupid genocider - thanks to him his country almost ceased to exist.

Idiot forget,that communism is religion,and war of soviets and Mao was war of religions,and had notching to do wit balance of power.

P.S Merry Christmas !
Nope, China was too big to get stomped by the USSR and had nukes, and the winner would have been standing against an intact west, so trying to balance between the USSR and China was logical and Kissinger and Nixon's strategy was sound.
Don't forget, Kissinger and RN were the USA's State Sec/NSC and President, not Poland's. :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top