Oh come on man, the living conditions have nothing to do with what makes a good person, being good is in my opinion an objective thing. My point is that a lot of people, if not a majority, are not good people. And that is why living conditions suck.
Good people make good environments, bad people make bad environments. Outside is bad, so do the maths.
That's kind of an incoherent answer. "Living conditions have nothing to do with what makes a good person", but "good people make good environments"? Sounds like good environments (living conditions) do have something to do with what makes a good person.
And that answer just raises the question, what makes a "good environment"? Suppose someone believes that Sodom and Gomorrah were actually good environments, and works towards making their environment like Sodom and Gomorrah. Is that person a "good person" for doing that? If you were to say no because Sodom and Gomorrah were not in fact good environments, what makes you correct and the other person wrong?