"Woke" Franchises

D

Deleted member 88

Guest
I mean, the Vikings are still culturally seen as cool and hip. Both because of some weird ideas of Norse gender equality, and uh because of some rock music, like in the TV show(which isn't bad to be fair, just Vikings be awesome man)

It doesn't acknowledge that the Norse within a few generations had integrated into Christian society.
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
I mean, the Vikings are still culturally seen as cool and hip. Both because of some weird ideas of Norse gender equality, and uh because of some rock music, like in the TV show(which isn't bad to be fair, just Vikings be awesome man)

It doesn't acknowledge that the Norse within a few generations had integrated into Christian society.
Its just more example of leftist and liberal hypocrisy. Norse go around pillaging and raping good, British do the same? Bad.

Just like the Ghost Samurai game. Mongols called brutal by the people they are invading? Yikes! That is a bad look.
 

Nikkolas

Active member
Its just more example of leftist and liberal hypocrisy. Norse go around pillaging and raping good, British do the same? Bad.

Just like the Ghost Samurai game. Mongols called brutal by the people they are invading? Yikes! That is a bad look.

I think you're probably reading too much into it. I haven't played Valhalla but I can tell you with 100% certainty that Leftists don't like Ancient Sparta. Or Athens. Or anything Greek, really. They gain the truest pleasure from shitting on these foundations of our existence and have accused Ubi of whitewashing or glorifying the Spartans in Odyssey.

So...I dunno. I think Ubisoft just chose "cool" cultures. Average people liked 300, right? And that Vikings TV show? Let's make a game about it.
 
Last edited:

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
I think you're probably reading too much into it. I haven't played Valhalla but I can tell you with 100% certainty that Leftists don't like Ancient Sparta. Or Athens. Or anything Greek, really. They gain the truest pleasure from shitting on these foundations of our existence and have accused Ubi of whitewashing or glorifying the Spartans in Odyssey.

So...I dunno. I think Ubisoft just chose "cool" cultures. Average people liked 300, right? And that Vikings TV show? Let's make a game about it.

Is taht
I'm critiquing leftist and liberal hypocrisy. The things I mentioned? Actual leftists have said this. My post wasn't about Ubisoft.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
That, and there're articles gushing about how "Destroy Christ! Burn the churches down!" are "exactly the kind of energy we need today!" Replace Christ with whatever religious mortal is the most important in your religion, and then tell me how much you like that claim.

Say, did any convert to Islam?

I still remember my Western History Teacher in college boasting about how they converted to Islam so as to somehow make their raids more holy and righteous

This was the same Western History Teacher who praised the Germanic Barbarians sacking and conquering Rome while saying this was why Muslims should be let in en masse to Europe.....no seriously I tried pointing out how horrible that comparison was and she went “Haha you’re being cute”

Yeah, and I’m from the fucking Philippines and that was my college professor spouting similar bullshit as Westerners
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
Say, did any convert to Islam?

I still remember my Western History Teacher in college boasting about how they converted to Islam so as to somehow make their raids more holy and righteous

This was the same Western History Teacher who praised the Germanic Barbarians sacking and conquering Rome while saying this was why Muslims should be let in en masse to Europe.....no seriously I tried pointing out how horrible that comparison was and she went “Haha you’re being cute”

Yeah, and I’m from the fucking Philippines and that was my college professor spouting similar bullshit as Westerners
What was your teachers problems with the Romans? They spent majority of their time beating up on Europeans not the precious oh so precious black people. Romans were even hella gay.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
What was your teachers problems with the Romans? They spent majority of their time beating up on Europeans not the precious oh so precious black people. Romans were even hella gay.

No problem with them, she just said that those germanics “strengthened” Rome by conquering what she considered a decaying civilization

Just so you know, she also does the same “Haha you’re cute” when she covered the Crusades, when I said that the Muslims enslaved lots of Europeans even before said Crusades

Honestly, I can very much bet that she ONLY knows a VERY abridged version of history, one sort of designed for indoctrination as well
 

Val the Moofia Boss

Well-known member
Romans were even hella gay.

People miss the point about why Romans wrote about Emperor Nero marrying a man. They didn't write it because they accepted it. They wrote it because it was considered depraved. They wrote it because it was one more thing that made Nero unpopular and disgusting to the populace. He was hated by pagans for violating Mos Maiorum. He was hated by Romans for living a depraved and opulent lifestyle that offended their sensibilities. Nero was a bloodthirsty mass murderer who butchered lots and lots and lots of Christians. Nero was so unpopular they literally buried his palace as soon as he was dead. It was embarrassing.

Beware of the historical revisionists who cherry pick the praises of Nero from his small set of followers.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
People miss the point about why Romans wrote about Emperor Nero marrying a man. They didn't write it because they accepted it. They wrote it because it was considered depraved. They wrote it because it was one more thing that made Nero unpopular and disgusting to the populace. He was hated by pagans for violating Mos Maiorum. He was hated by Romans for living a depraved and opulent lifestyle that offended their sensibilities. Nero was a bloodthirsty mass murderer who butchered lots and lots and lots of Christians. Nero was so unpopular they literally buried his palace as soon as he was dead. It was embarrassing.

Beware of the historical revisionists who cherry pick the praises of Nero from his small set of followers.

I’m disappointed that so much of history is heavily abridged these days

It was only in college I found out that sure Ferdinand Marcos was an asshole, but there were reasons why people actually liked him back in the day and still do, even found out that Ninoy Aquino was also a POS before he returned and got assassinated
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
People miss the point about why Romans wrote about Emperor Nero marrying a man. They didn't write it because they accepted it. They wrote it because it was considered depraved. They wrote it because it was one more thing that made Nero unpopular and disgusting to the populace. He was hated by pagans for violating Mos Maiorum. He was hated by Romans for living a depraved and opulent lifestyle that offended their sensibilities. Nero was a bloodthirsty mass murderer who butchered lots and lots and lots of Christians. Nero was so unpopular they literally buried his palace as soon as he was dead. It was embarrassing.

Beware of the historical revisionists who cherry pick the praises of Nero from his small set of followers.
What? Hadrian and Trajan both had female wife's but apparently both had a thing for fucking men or was it boys I forget.

I’m disappointed that so much of history is heavily abridged these days
You mean cherrypicked or censored or ignored.


No problem with them, she just said that those germanics “strengthened” Rome by conquering what she considered a decaying civilization

Just so you know, she also does the same “Haha you’re cute” when she covered the Crusades, when I said that the Muslims enslaved lots of Europeans even before said Crusades

Honestly, I can very much bet that she ONLY knows a VERY abridged version of history, one sort of designed for indoctrination as well

So a Feminist that subscribes to this basically:

Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times

And she doesn't realize the irony of her beliefs? The common talked about point for this quote is that society becomes more feminine and caters to women aka feminism and abhors the masculine male and indulges in endless hedonism and consumerism. All things feminism and leftism in general pushes for.

So she is say that she and her ilk help civilization to decay and glory in the idea of some outside foreign invader that is not weak to destroy it all.

Lol, MGTOW and the RED Pill have talked about this exact scenario for why women love refugees so much. The native men are weak, need non-weak men. Lets import them.

And if she subscribes to this point, why does she have a problem with the Crusades?
 

Culsu

Agent of the Central Plasma
Founder
Well, if they despise weak men so much, why are they doing everything in their power to create them?
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Well, if they despise weak men so much, why are they doing everything in their power to create them?

When it comes to the NPCs don’t expect much consistency or even honesty towards themselves in their own minds, if they actually think things through they’d be too horrified by what they realize they will get
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Well, if they despise weak men so much, why are they doing everything in their power to create them?
Blame feminism for that. It brainwashes women into thinking men and women are fundamentally the same, and they try to raise sons the same way they'd raise daughters. If the father was present, he'd set them straight and take the son under his wing.
MGTOW and Redpillers say that Feminism is a giant shit test and men failed it miserably.
It is. If the western civilizations go under, at least I will have the hateful statisfication of knowing that the next generations of women will never again have the same rights as men. They will always stay second-class citizens.
 

JagerIV

Well-known member
From a little essay I've created a thread to discuss:

"An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.

Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed."
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
From a little essay I've created a thread to discuss:

"An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.

Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed."
To be fair, the Romans were always complaining about their women from the very beginning; nearly every single one who had an ounce of renown was portrayed as a conniving witch who murdered her way to power by her peers and early Roman historians.
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
Well, if they despise weak men so much, why are they doing everything in their power to create them?
There is another question that shows the contradiction, feminism seems to want to make their female "heroes" who are supposed to inspire girls be nearly all seemingly butch of manly in appearance of attitude.

For a group that hates men and seems to say that women are better then men, they seem to spend a lot of time trying to make women into men in a way.

Blame feminism for that. It brainwashes women into thinking men and women are fundamentally the same, and they try to raise sons the same way they'd raise daughters. If the father was present, he'd set them straight and take the son under his wing.
They raise sons to be weak while raising the daughters to be strong.

It is. If the western civilizations go under, at least I will have the hateful statisfication of knowing that the next generations of women will never again have the same rights as men. They will always stay second-class citizens.
You mean civilizational collapse, there is more then just the West. Even in freaking China, you have women who are basically feminists.

And as shown by @JagerIV , this is a cycle that has been repeating since forever if one believes it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top