TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
A very ineffective one I would add.Right, so less than 10% are mixed-couples, yet they're the majority in ads and the like.
That's called 'an agenda'.
A very ineffective one I would add.Right, so less than 10% are mixed-couples, yet they're the majority in ads and the like.
That's called 'an agenda'.
Maybe, but it's fueled by racial hatred. Which is never a good thing.A very ineffective one I would add.
Leftists adore race-mixing, for whatever reason. The fact it destroys minority populations over a period of time is beside them.
I mean, not sure if you're aware of this, but it can bring various genetic disorders out of two otherwise healthy parents, cause issues with tissue transplants, a lack of belonging to any particular community, etc.Although, really the only argument against race-mixing is "racial purity" and... that tends to be a bad thing historically.
You know me that there many things are on case by case look. Some probably are out of hatred, others self-hatred and others probably are gullible or naive to believe in a 100% mixed race future.Maybe, but it's fueled by racial hatred. Which is never a good thing.
Could be related to the statics showing that no other men are particularly interested in them.That's the exact reason why some on the left DON'T approve.
Black women especially seem to be against black men race mixing.
There's many real arguments against it, but ultimately the choice is between two loving people, and nobody else's.
Could be related to the statics showing that no other men are particularly interested in them.
There are also potential genetic benefits too but in the end, yes. This.
In the end, i'm white and my fiance is white. Just how it happened. I've always been open to anything.
Race is largely irrelevant to me. I was far more concerned we aligned on religious (or lack thereof) and political (non-extremist either way) lines.
Outside of inbred populations to begin with (hybrid vigor), there kinda isn't.There are also potential genetic benefits too but in the end, yes. This.
And it's always the same fucking pairing, black (or some shade of brown) men with White women.
Look, if 90% of advertisements and media proudly showed off Chinese-male, African female pairings in Nigeria, they'd have a damn good excuse to be pissed off.
All that really says is the backlash a few years ago, finally got through to them.So curious, I did a search for the top ten commercials on iSpot TV.
Again, while I do post about political correctness, I don't think a thread of gaming is the most appropriate to discuss interracial or not relationships and the pushing by liberal progressive "creators".
All that really says is the backlash a few years ago, finally got through to them.
At one point you really had to ask yourself "Are White British people even a thing anymore?" at Christmas.
The remake replaces a bunch of scientists with women scientists. Because of course it does. Authentic remakes are icky. We live in an eternal present.
Oh remind me, how many were in the original game?Women?! SCIENTISTS?! The audacity. How absurd!
/sarcasm
Women?! SCIENTISTS?! The audacity. How absurd!
/sarcasm
Women?! SCIENTISTS?! The audacity. How absurd!
/sarcasm
Oh remind me, how many were in the original game?
So if we were to 're-make' the game, how many should we add?
Oh the answer to both are 0? Shocking!
Authenticity is more important than pointless modern politics.
Yeah, in 2003, when the game is set in, it is kinda absurd to have a shitload of female scientists running around.