Couldn't find any reference to islam on his wiki page. Reason I was looking is that I'd put air quotes around the term if what he joined was the Church of Islam, like Mohammed Ali. What they practice is even less Islam than LDS is Christianity.
We don't care what you doing.Hehehe....truth.
And those bosses have exposed themselves more than enoughSilly Bacle. The Media ain't covering Maxwell! They'd be exposing their bosses. Lol!
The only 'optics' PF nailed was Glowie LARPing as fringe Right, with a dash of 'look, we can carry riot gear just like Antifa and BLM'.
Years of whining about 'optics', Patriot Front nails the optics, and the hue and cry goes up "you're too optical, can't be real!" But hey, maybe a litmus test for doomers, slacktivists, and shareblues.
The right wing when it does rallies or stuff like this, would have more people of different body types. Wouldnt come looking like the left, but either come armed or just to protest. NOT prepare for combat.The only 'optics' PF nailed was Glowie LARPing as fringe Right, with a dash of 'look, we can carry riot gear just like Antifa and BLM'.
The only people I hear saying anything about their weigh/fitness, as it relates to 'legitimacy/lack there of' for PF are people like you, who think they are legit and that anyone who has issues with them is because those people are 'fat and lazy'.
This is about people like you being upset that much of the Right has no interest in psuedo-militia grifters who look like they are full of glowies, long on rhetoric, and short on policy.
I never even paid any attention to their physique till the idea that people suspicious of them are so because of body image/weight issues.The right wing when it does rallies or stuff like this, would have more people of different body types. Wouldnt come looking like the left, but either come armed or just to protest. NOT prepare for combat.
Body type somewhat does matter when talking about this stuff. One needs to think about they all look average build. No super strong guys, no super skinny guys. Nothing like that
Why the Right/trad cons/social cons keep losing, summed up in a couple of sentences. Raising your kids to live in a world that no longer exists, for the sake of 'tradition' or willing denial of how society has changed/is changing, only sets them back and hinders them.
Why the Right/trad cons/social cons keep losing, summed up in a couple of sentences. Raising your kids to live in a world that no longer exists, for the sake of 'tradition' or willing denial of how society has changed/is changing, only sets them back and hinders them.
The trad-con/social-con problem is, it is not a view that tries to figure out how to adapt to the future very much, and instead tries to make the present and future conform to the past's circumstances and limitations.Your assuming that tradition is a lot less flexible then it is.
Tradition when you get down to it is the trial and error results of a country, civilization and culture. This is why the traditions of one place can be so markedly different then another because what works in the deserts of the sararah might fail hilariously in a tropical environment.
In the case of the united states if you include the colonial period that is roughly 400 years of trial and error experimentation if you include just christian civilization we have over 2000 years of trial and error experiementation. If you include classical era and even before the bronze age collapse you get even more time.
That is why tradition is as powerful as it is, because its based on a deep well of time, and its very easy to reporpose old solutions to new problems.
The trad-con/social-con problem is, it is not a view that tries to figure out how to adapt to the future very much, and instead tries to make the present and future conform to the past's circumstances and limitations.
It's why lib-con actually do make headway, because liberty is a concept that bridges many media, elite, or racism, induced divides in the nation and is something both sides value, or at least used to.
Now, I understand that there is legit fear of the slippery slope in not pushing as hard to the Right/'towards tradition' as possible.
However, social ideas and paradigms have to be able to adapt to tech/cultural shifts due to tech as well. Most of us here grew up when the internet was barely a thing, the kids now have to deal with a fully mature internet/social media/email/messaging ecosystem that is omnipresent and ubiquitous in most modern societies.
It's why lib-cons and moderate Rs (not RINOs, they are establishment hacks) actually do make headway, because liberty is a concept that bridges many media, elite, or racism, induced divides in the nation and is something both sides value, though to what degree is now up for debate.
Now, I will admit that I do feel like maybe the Amish could work as an example of 'trad-cons/social walking their talk' while also being generally upstanding and liked members of the community/their own smaller community in their home regions. Only issue is, that doesn't work on a national scale.