If you consider withholding facts as not being part of being completely honest.
For example lets say:
Employee: This contract says I will lose $100,000 an episode if I'm sick or suffer an accident.
Employer: Contract is worth $50,000,000 over four years, with 192 episodes a year. He can produce multiple episodes in one day, or on Fridays to make up for Sick Days or to have other days off. Any disability will be covered by a pro-rata fee.
And if your paying a YouTuber $50,000,000 and they get banned from YouTube, there should be no penalty?
Oh we'll still pay Crowder the full amount... even if no one can watch him or be monetized by him on YouTube?
And keep in mind... This was all apparently negotiable and non-binding since it was an opening Term Sheet that Crowder apparently requested.
EDIT:
Apparently according to Jeremy Boreing, Steven Crowder responded with a counteroffer of $120 million over four years. No financial penalties for bans, demonitization, illness etc and the Daily Wire would also continue to market him and support him in finding sponsorships, infrastructure, technical support and paying for the production and marketing of any specials and documentaries that DailyWire might stipulate in the contract as well.
The DailyWire apparently declined the counteroffer and declined Steven's invitation to send another offer so Steven Crowder was apparently gracious about it at the time. This apparently happened back in September-October and than now in January Crowder apparently laid into Jeremy Boreing in a more hostile manner then he did on his show when he released the episode the next day apparently.
He also repeatedly stating it was an initial term offer, non-binding and negotiable and expected that if negotiations took place, Crowder likely would've gotten more money, penalties would've been reduced and required work days also shrink.