We know the friggin' mechanism. We've known for years. Lipid nanoparticles and viral vectors are not specifically targeted at deltoid muscle tissue. They want to act like these vaccines transfect only a few muscle cells in the shoulder and cause them to present whole Spike protein on their surfaces. That is not the case. They travel all around the body and transfect heart muscle, brain tissue, tissues in the vital organs, and so on, and they induce the immune system to attack what were otherwise healthy tissues as though they were foreign objects, like transplant rejection. All the damage is being done by immune cells going after those Spike-presenting cells and destroying them utterly. When white blood cells see a cell with viral proteins sticking out of it, it doesn't matter if it's the wall of the heart or aorta. It's getting engulfed and digested, no matter what.All I see on soc-meds are anecdotes of people who have lost loved ones and friends after taking the Vax from the same causes; heart attacks, strokes, cancers, et cetera.
When you have multitudes of different people across different soc-med platforms relaying the same horrors over and over, they can't all be dismissed as "bots" and "misinformation" like how NPC's like to claim.
The Vax is killing healthy people.
I had an argument with PainRack on Discord about this, and he stated that this isn't possible, because the transfected cells don't present whole Spike on their surfaces, but only fragments held by MHC. Unfortunately, this is incorrect. They absolutely are decorated with WHOLE SPIKE.
What a brilliant idea, DARPA. Let's just make healthy cells look like foreign objects to the immune system. I'm sure nothing will go wrong.
Loading…
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
In conclusion, it is essential to underline that every human cell that intakes the LNPs and translates the viral protein (in case of the mRNA vaccines), or that gets infected by the adenovirus and expresses and translates the viral protein (in case of the adenovirus-based vaccines), is inevitably recognized as a threat by the immune system and killed (Figure 1). There are no exceptions to this mechanism. The severity of the resulting damage and the consequences for health depend on the quantity of the cells involved, on the type of tissue and on the strength of the following autoimmune reaction. For instance, if the mRNA contained in the LNPs would get internalized by cardiac myocytes, and such cells would produce the spike protein, the resulting inflammation would likely lead to the necrosis of the myocardium, with an extent proportional to the number of involved cells. Therefore, it is fundamental to perform pharmacokinetic evaluations in humans, in order to determine the exact biodistribution of the vaccines against COVID-19, and thus to identify the possible tissues at threat.
Autoimmune Inflammatory Reactions Triggered by the COVID-19 Genetic Vaccines in Terminally Differentiated Tissues
As a result of the spread of SARS-CoV-2, a global pandemic was declared. Indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination has been extended to include age groups and naturally immune people with minimal danger of suffering serious complications due to COVID-19. Solid immuno-histopathological evidence...
www.preprints.org
Comment: The comment is inaccurate for at least three reasons. 1) the full-lenght Spike protein is actually expressed on the surface of mRNA-transfected muscle cells or immune cells (https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/spike-protein-behavior), our paper shows that these proteins are expressed by OTHER differentiated cells besides muscle cells; 2) assuming that only pieces of Spike protein are expressed by target cells, these non-self peptides should be enough to trigger autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory reactions capable of damaging the indicated organs; 3) the proof that Spike protein derived by vaccine and not by virus is quite straightforward: in immunohystochemistry only S protein and not N protein was detected.
Comment: We thank the commentator for giving us the opportunity to deepen the contents of our paper. Please, find below a point-by-point answer:
• "I think this article is inaccurate in that cells do not express the spike protein fully on the membrane triggering an autoimmune response. Under normal circumstances HLA class I, present on all nucleated cells display peptides derived from the proteins being created inside the cell, as described correctly in the paper. Also dendritic cells and others display peptides from any foreign entity on the HLA class II receptors. HLA Class I bind to the variable parts of the amino acids, are enclosed and only accept peptides that are 5-9 amino acids long. and vary significantly in individuals. HLA Class II bind to the amino part of the peptide and are open ended.
Autoimmunity arises because of B and T cells that have occurred in the peripheral tissue that have not gone through the self/non self selection process in the bone marrow and hence cannot distinguish between self and non self peptides presented on cells and the proceed to target cells that are not infected. Another mechanism that can cause problems is molecular mimicry where peptides are similar to proteins found on native cells and antibodies that are created attacke those native cells, as in Guillain Barre Syndrome.
Thus the sentence at the end of paragraph 3 on page 2 is, I believe, incorrect."
Answer: The fact that the spike protein can be displayed on the cellular membrane even as an entire protein (upon transfection with the mRNA vaccines, or upon infection with the adenoviral vaccines) is not a notion that has been introduced in our paper, but rather it is something that has been discussed by several authors since the introduction of the genetic vaccines against COVID-19. In this regard, please see the reviews by Mascellino et al. (1), and Cagigi and Loré (2). However, there is not a consolidated opinion yet, and in fact, in the paper we quote the words of Pfizer's Senior Vice President for Vaccine Clinical R&D Dr. William Gruber: "we don't have a complete understanding of the nature of the way that the vaccine works in terms of producing immune response" (3). Having said that, what really matters for the purposes of our paper, is that every antigen presenting cell is going to be perceived as a threat by the immune system and killed regardless of how the vaccine-derived spike protein is presented: as an entire protein, or as a fragment derived from the proteasomal degradation and mounted on the MHC I (in case of the nucleated cells) or on the MHC II (in case of the APCs). In short, even if the entire protein is not displayed on the cell membrane, its peptide fragments are presented on the MHC, because this is how the antigen presentation process works.
The Merriam-Webster medical dictionary defines autoimmunity as: "a condition in which the body produces an immune response against its own tissue constituents" (6). Autoimmunity is a broad definition that can have different origins, depending on the triggering factor. Among them, autoimmunity can have a viral triggering factor. Quote from Hussein and Rahal: "Viral infection has been associated with multiple autoimmune diseases. These infections typically trigger several immune processes some of which could overwhelm the immune regulatory mechanisms. This may result in immune reactions directed to viral as well as host antigens potentially resulting in tissue damage. Several mechanisms, including molecular mimicry, bystander activation of T-cells and epitope spreading have been the primary ways of explaining how a viral infection might induce a series of reactions resulting in an autoimmune disease"(7).
Molecular-mimicry triggers reactions against self antigens that share structural similarities with viral epitopes, for which the immune system has created reacting antibodies; but, as abovementioned, immune reactions resulting in tissue damage can be directed even against viral antigens. The genetic vaccines induce human cells to synthesize a viral antigen, the spike protein, triggering this mechanism.
BREAKING NEWS: DARPA Unclassified documents confirm SARS-CoV-2 was created by EcoHealth Alliance at the Wuhan Institute of Virology coordinated by Peter Daszak - American Media Group
BREAKING NEWS: DARPA Unclassified documents confirm SARS-CoV-2 was created by EcoHealth Alliance at the Wuhan Institute of Virology coordinated by Peter Daszak Medeea Greere, an independent publisher, is now on Telegram at https://t.me/AMGNEWS2022 and exists only on reader support as we publish...
amg-news.com
DARPA has openly bragged on Twitter that Moderna's mRNA vaccine technology, and by extension Moderna's Covid vaccine, was a product of their ADEPT program.
Moderna's vaccine was a product of DARPA funding. COVID-19 came from a lab where scientists were working on research for EcoHealth's rejected DEFUSE proposal, which sought DARPA funding.
NIH funds EcoHealth Alliance. NIH also co-own the patents to Moderna's vaccine.
Like I have been saying for literally years now, the virus and the vaccine came from the same fucking funding streams. The same parties. The same place.
Fraud. Mass murder. Crimes against humanity.