So thought crimes and speech crimes are things you endorse?Pedophiles deserve life imprisonment.
Pedophile apologists deserve death.
/thread
So thought crimes and speech crimes are things you endorse?Pedophiles deserve life imprisonment.
Pedophile apologists deserve death.
/thread
So thought crimes and speech crimes are things you endorse?
If so, then they should be punished for their actions. This idea of arresting people for thoughts won't lead to a good place for you. The government will then come for the racists, then the 'racists', then the not-woke, then the not-woke enough. A just law system punishes actions, not thoughts.Don't kid yourself; whatever your ideological fantasy worldview tells you is true, here in real life the only people who write or think positively of raping little kiddies invariable end up getting outed as practitioners of those acts.
If so, then they should be punished for their actions. This idea of arresting people for thoughts won't lead to a good place for you. The government will then come for the racists, then the 'racists', then the not-woke, then the not-woke enough. A just law system punishes actions, not thoughts.
This just in: @YeahOkayCool doesn't understand probable cause.This just in: "probable cause" is immoral.
If someone publicly defends pedophilia under their own name, then that IMO is probable cause for the police and social services to investigate.
That isn’t probable cause as any US police would define it. Maybe you’re thinking of “reasonable suspicion” which is when there is justification to stop someone, frisk then, question them, or investigate. It’s not even reasonable suspicion though.This just in: "probable cause" is immoral.
If someone publicly defends pedophilia under their own name, then that IMO is probable cause for the police and social services to investigate.
That isn’t probable cause as any US police would define it. Maybe you’re thinking of “reasonable suspicion” which is when there is justification to stop someone, frisk then, question them, or investigate. It’s not even reasonable suspicion though.
How would you define “defending pedophilia” in your ideal legal system? Is saying that perophiles shouldn’t be arrested defending pedophilia? In which case, numerous people would be supposedly defending it. Is defending pedophilia saying that child molestation should be legal?
In any case, free speech is our most important right and people have the right to say those things even if you think it’s horrible. Compromising free speech would be undermining the most important values of Western civilization.
You know what else undermines Western civilization? Childfucking.
It’s weird, you guys have Lefties who hate the Male Gaze and yet try to be “progressive” or “tolerant” in real fucked up ways for “special” people
It's only confusing if you take their statements at face value. A few hopelessly naiive true believers aside, the entire purpose was always to wear down society's prohibitions on childfucking.
Sexual attraction is a behavior. It has an innate framework upon which the complete behavior is trained, just like walking. However it is a predictive mental behavior rather than a physical behavior, so the feedback loop is much more difficult to manage for deliberate training.
Behavior modification for pedophilia would have to be, extreme to a degree most civilized societies would find objectionable. Which is a problem, I believe in the 90's some states in the US used to chemically castrate them and or force them to take libido killing drugs as part of a condition of release. I am uncertain if that practice continues?
Except that I'm not acting like an ITG, instead arguing from genuine belief. I mean, where I come from they used to pitch activists out of cargo planes...so it really doesn't seem all that extreme to me, seeing as these people are, genuinely what they are.
Behavior modification for pedophilia would have to be, extreme to a degree most civilized societies would find objectionable. Which is a problem, I believe in the 90's some states in the US used to chemically castrate them and or force them to take libido killing drugs as part of a condition of release. I am uncertain if that practice continues?