What the fuck
How is there a market for that?
lol no. I mean to build a factory where you make that, wouldn't it be an economic loss for the company....you're new here on the internet, aren't you?
. . .Neither was hate speech. Try again. If you want to ditch obscenity, you are also going to allow them to call hate speech obscene, and they'll decide to police that instead of porn. Seriously, this isn't hard: government is a monkey's paw. Stop wishing on it.
"I'm perfectly capable of targeting innocents and criminals at the same time." Wow, you and everyone else. Guess what, the socialists are literally counting on that. Unless you target with some amount of care, the socialists will call bigotry and be believed, unlike what is happening now, when they are calling bigotry and no one believes it. No one believing it is one reason the right is winning. If you decide and score an own goal? Well, you might fumble this culture win away too.I am perfectly capable of targeting the socialists at the same time.
No. The reverse is actually true. KKK members were arrested for speech that was seen as increasing racial animus in Brandenburg v Ohio, which was finally ruled on in 1969. We also have the Skokie decision in 1977 about the right to march through streets with nazi paraphenilia because it had hate content.Firstly, "hate speech" was not a thing until the 1970s, the first Hate Speech laws were passed then AFAIK, and most of what we consider falling under "Hate Speech" is easily shown to have been part of basic political speech going back to the 18th century, especially Racially based hate speech, and was thus considered protected.
No, hate speech bans were said to be unconstitional in 1977 with National Socialist Party of America v Village of Skokie (as I alluded to above, one of the city ordinances violated was a hate speech distribution ban), which found that a swastika was valid 1st amendment expression. RAV v St Paul was more a continuation of that, applying to cross burning etc.Further, Hate Speech was not categorically destroyed as unconstitutional until the 1990s and was not done via the precedents that loosened Obscenity laws, but rather was part of the broader rolling back of restrictions on inflammatory political speech that had been underway once Originalists and Textualists began gaining traction on the court. Most obscenity laws were overturned not by them, but by the earlier progressive court.
And was ditched because it could not be made a clearly-defined and limited-scope exception, let alone have the public interest demonstrated in court at the time. Even now, there's far less controversial and even more unreasonable to block things that do more damage than what has been uncovered only because both the removal of obscenity laws and the advent of the Internet making a joke of distribution barriers.Obscenity was not considered free speech until the 1970's.
We shall see about that.And was ditched because it could not be made a clearly-defined and limited-scope exception, let alone have the public interest demonstrated in court at the time. Even now, there's far less controversial and even more unreasonable to block things that do more damage than what has been uncovered only because both the removal of obscenity laws and the advent of the Internet making a joke of distribution barriers.
@DarthOne I'm curious. Who or what was personally affected in your life for you to increasingly spiral down the slippery slope. You've greatly changed since first coming to the sietch that that statistically doesn't happen unless it becomes personal.
Okay that doesn't explain wanting to burn everything else down though.Personally? No one. I've just seen enough of what the LGBTQ Maffia have been up to and how infested with Groomers, pedos and worse it is and always has been.
Okay that doesn't explain wanting to burn everything else down though.
Here's the WEF/Globalist/Communitarian/Neo-Malthusian plan, summed up:
- Stuffing people in 15-minute arcologies where everything is within walking distance, and then banning private cars and only letting people use rented robo-taxis, electric scooters, bicycles, walking, et cetera, to get to their destinations, reducing the range of the average person such that they're forced into serfdom in techno-neofeudalistic city-states.
- No more vacationing, no more cruises, no more civil aviation for the plebs. Only private aircraft for the 1%.
- No more meat. It's too energy-intensive to produce. Soy and insect powder for the plebs.
- No more single-family zoning. Everyone will have a connected wall and live in micro-apartments the size of prison cells which will cost as much to rent as actual full-size apartments.
- Passive solar, heat pumps, and LED lighting on all new residential construction.
- XR telecommuting in the Metaverse in Zuckerberg's digital Second Life shopping malls to replace real commutes and office buildings (all office work will be digitized, paperless, and cloud-based to facilitate this).
- Eventually, with implanted brain-computer interfaces, heavy goggles will be replaced with "seamless XR" where you can just close your eyes and step into the metaverse without using any energy to get there, or walk around your drab and boring micro-apartment and have other, illusory locales filled with imaginary wealth and substance layered on top.
- No more private ownership of computer hardware that uses more wattage than a tablet or subnotebook. All AI gains will be centralized in data centers owned by a few monopolistic giants to make sure that those AIs aren't used to replicate populist pleb values and ideas. Only approved government-corpo-academia communitarian ideas are allowed to be promoted by AI.
- Nothing scares these people shitless like the idea of based AI proliferating and spreading populist ideas.
- AI teachers, AI babysitters, AI propaganda brainwashing, everywhere.
- Destruction of the nuclear family and traditionalism. Children treated as "small adults" and wards of the state, subject to entirely centralized and digitized education. Homeschooling outlawed as dangerous and radical.
- Implanted digital ID linked to a CBDC. All bank cards, driver's licenses, and other forms of ID are no longer physical, but linked to a cryptographic hash stored in the nanotech in your body.
- Everything that is currently private property is subject to servitization. You don't buy a refrigerator or a washing machine. You subscribe to them. Everything is on a lease model. If you are cut off from banking for expressing radical no-no wrongthink badthoughts, you can no longer make payments on the things scattered around your bugman dormitory. This is what Ida Auken means by owning nothing and being happy. What it means is that the rich and their holding companies will own things and collect rents on them.
- No class mobility, ever. Born a pleb, die a pleb. You don't earn money. You are given monthly rations of UBI good-boy tokens for obedience to the state.
- What a green, restorative, circular/steady-state economy actually means in practice is that all the companies currently producing literal plastic garbage mountains of consoomer bullshit will make the same revenues as before while producing far fewer actual goods, because they'll make different people pay subscription fees to rent the same lump of matter.
- In other words, it means deliberately arresting GDP growth and stretching the wealth we already have. Wealth creation is replaced with wealth management, i.e. rentierism.
- Since there won't be enough wealth to satisfy the plebs in this arrangement, there need to be far fewer plebs to distribute the wealth to (i.e. depopulation).
- Robots will create a larger and larger share of all new wealth, eventually making human wage labor irrelevant. As the population contracts due to depopulation, so too do the various services that robots would otherwise need to provide, like maintaining container ships and other transport infrastructure.
- Automated infrastructure will become increasingly inhuman, autarkic, and self-maintaining. Tasks that robots are poor at will be minimized, and the entire economy will be restructured around things robots are competent at doing.
- Once human labor is fully irrelevant, the 1% will massacre the helpless and disarmed remainder of humanity and leave behind maybe ten million very wealthy psychopaths enjoying a post-scarcity free wealth cornucopia with their robots, frolicking on empty beaches, tearing down the hollow husks of our cities and replacing them with mansions, and so on.
Can't speak for him but I'll give my own 2 cents. The left is composed of a group of out of touch academics who push forth theories that will absolutely burn down society. some push it because they believe this time will be different some because they believe they will be on top. below them we got a bunch of people who have checked out and vote blue no matter who and wonder why things get worse and we also got a loosely controlled mob of attack dogs in antifa types who can mostly be directed at the opposition with some collateral damage. their win condition is burning down our society.Okay that doesn't explain wanting to burn everything else down though.
I'm sorry but do those protect trans kids signs have the planned parenthood logo on them? the fuck man.
I'm sorry but do those protect trans kids signs have the planned parenthood logo on them? the fuck man.
Yes.That seems to be the case.
"I'm perfectly capable of targeting innocents and criminals at the same time." Wow, you and everyone else. Guess what, the socialists are literally counting on that. Unless you target with some amount of care, the socialists will call bigotry and be believed, unlike what is happening now, when they are calling bigotry and no one believes it. No one believing it is one reason the right is winning. If you decide and score an own goal? Well, you might fumble this culture win away too.