Search results

OK, simple question...have we seen what the actual charges are?

How is what Tucker did against the Russian sanctions?

In regards to the interview and Putin's...historical diarrhea, I think that was actually Putin filibustering his own interview. Killed a quarter of the interview with historical rambling to justify armed invasion. I mean, it kept down the question count and meant that many, MANY people turned...

and why is History Learner trying to get people's personal info?

That's definitely more likely. The other alternative I asked about was an idea that popped into my head as I was writing.

I think you're interpreting that phrase wrong. At least it feels that way. There's no compulsion in it. Like @Rocinante said, the interviewee has a say in the matter as well. As for the 'anywhere' bit. The interviewer better have their crap together if the interview is conducted in a foreign...

Totally agree with you. Per your interpretation. That does NOT make it true. I'm going to weigh the outcome AFTER I watch it, not before. I'm not cheering Tucker Carlson on. I'm trying to keep an open mind to what I hear so I can then chase things down the rabbit hole.

;) Yer right, but it will get seen by many more people. Sure, but I'm curious as to how this will impact Tucker's opinion and want to hear his conclusions as well. Sure, but that's not really the concern for us. It's about getting real news and world events to the populations of those...

In general, yes. The counterpoint should be there so we can examine everything. As Tucker Carlson said, he'll show us what's said, and we get to make up our minds. They won't, that's obvious. The answer is that yes, we can access the populace through many different means. Possibly, we'll see.

We have, but many others are very much NOT informed.

I think that much of the questioning will be pre-selected. We'll see what kind of follow-up questions happen as well. I also want to see Tucker's reaction to everything once he's back in the states and generally safe from Putin's reprisals.

What has Tucker Carlson lied about, specifically? You're going to have to prove that Tucker has lied to us, with evidence. And disagreeing with someone's POV b/c they came to a different conclusion than you is NOT evidence.

OK, you've definitely got a hate-boner for Tucker Carlson. What caused this? Why not? We are NOT at war with them. Nothing from our administration has said you can't visit Russia. It's still a, relatively, free country, and each individual is welcome to travel where they want. It's NOT a smart...

Is it possible he wants both? Even if he just wants ratings, is that wrong?

That's a ridiculous take. Tucker wants answers to questions. Maybe wait till after he does a show on what he saw before you convict a man of treason in absentia.

Mom and pops handle that better than most. They have no problem pulling out paper receipts and a pen to get you taken care of. Cash still spends. Also...why would the power go out?

TBF to Jesse Waters, that's the kind of stuff Fox News has directed he cover in his current show. I imagine he'll have a lot more leeway in picking his own stories while trying to fill the massive hole Tucker Carlson left in Fox News. Time will tell.

You keep saying this, but it's blatantly wrong. There are many logical reasons that I and others have mentioned. There is plenty of motivation for Russia to have done this. Stop trying to pretend otherwise. It doesn't mean Russia DID IT, just that they had reason to.

Fox has already refuted this.

Called it!