We have, but many others are very much NOT informed.
We do have, and we have thousands of pages of very hot arguments about who's lying, who's a pawn, who's an idiot, who's a warmonger and so on, without much coming out of it.
Do you think having more of that stuff, but country wide, would be a good thing overall?
It does also touch upon a wider question about foreign agenda, delivered directly and indirectly.
Why should Chinese, Iranian, Qatari, Chinese etc governments have open access to the ear of western country's voters?
Are we going to get that favor returned and get to bullshit their decisionmakers, or at least populance (who gets even less say than ours) in exchange?
Hell, Jane Fonda actually went to Vietnam and materially supported them by acting as actual propaganda. A country we actually were at war with!
She got away with that scot free, when she actually could have been charged with treason.
So forgive me if all this screaming about Carlson reeks of double standards.
Precisely. She did get away with it. There was much ink and keyboards spent arguing about whether she should have gotten away with it.
But you will be hard pressed to find people on the right who know of it and don't at least think she deserves to be called a commie whore for it.
By that standard, Carlson is earning a fair dose of screaming, and anything less than that is also double standard.