If you are taking flak, you must be close to the target. I feel the same way about politics these days. Who is the MSM trying to takedown? They must be doing something right. Even if they are a crazy, they are at least drawing fire off other saner people. If they fight, they get supported. Even if only to buy time for someone better.
The Democrats want to cancel all sorts of people. At least a few of them are bound to hold noxious views.
Sure and that’s fair. Using that same analogy, the US spent a whole lot bulking the USSR up so that they would keep fighting the Germans. Some in the US aligned with the Soviets but more just saw them as a useful ally against a worse foe. Once the war was over things changed. Likewise, I’ll hold my nose for a chickenhawk like Ben. Even if I think he spends too long dunking on moronic college students and dodging having a serious opponent.
No. It's called setting standards, and sticking to them regardless of who it is. It's a powerful position to be in. It doesn't matter what they say about her. What matters is what she does. And what she has does is enough to disqualify her.
No, that's very much not true. It works especially well against such a media. In fact, it is even necessary against such a media. You need to recognize lost battles against such a media, and what is worth defending and what isn't.
It's focusing on just the Rothschilds exclusively, and not any other banking group, that makes it antisemetic. Jewish Bankers being the problem is a racist trope for a reason, and I see no reason to give the benefit of the doubt.
Or, in other words, if people are complaining about you accusing them of being white supremacists, than those accusations must be hitting close to home. Do you understand the problem with that logic now?
That's the thing though. If she also complained about Rockefeller or some other rich family and the Rothschilds, I'd have no problem. But in America, people who hate jews will complain exclusively about the Rothschilds as a see through attempt to hide hating Jews. We see this on the left with complaining that Israel has no right to exist, etc, to hide antisemitism.
I’m not sure I understand your logic. I’m not sure what you’re going for here? Complaining to authority is hardly a useful tool these days.
If your sworn opposition told you to not shove a fork into an electrical outlet, would you then think doing so is a good idea? If I then concurred, and pointed out the reasons why that would be a really stupid and dangerous thing to do, would that then make me one of them in your eyes?
That’s retarded if you think Republicans attacking them is a good idea in any semblance. An America First Caucus is great, MTG has been dragged through the mud, and Gosar is pretty awesome so I have high hopes for them. This a fantastic caucus in terms of what they want for their platform, and it’s exactly what is needed and must be adopted by the right and quickly if they want to survive. The bad members who need to be thrown out aren’t MTG, it’s the house minority leader, it’s the Neocons, it’s the establishment shills who want to do nothing except for line their pockets and pass pro big business legislature while America degenerates. Read their platform, it’s great. America First is inevitable.
There are very large Jewish led and operated organizations centered around the destruction of nationalism in America, that work very hard to kill off traditional America and bring in mass immigration. They openly flaunt their Jewish identity and they use that as a weapon. They as a whole are the wealthiest group of people in America and the vast majority support policies very antithetical to Americanism and will absolutely annihilate people publicly for speaking out against them. More people becoming antisemitic is in large part their fault. Does that mean you should condemn an entire group of people or think they are all one monolithic entity? No, you shouldn’t think that of anyone. But if you are more concerned with anti-semites than with the large organizations working to utilize the label of antisemitism to smear you and everyone else on the right or that has a tiny bit of patriotism or is against open borders, your priorities are all wrong.
Playgrounds reverse psychology is not what people need to look out for. Nor do you see a lot of it in practice. I would however be deeply suspicious of someone who agreed with them on too many policies. If you need to be told the difference between political ideology and that power sockets are not utensil holders I don’t know what to say.
for me it’s just whether or not they can or can’t recognize the three major issues facing the right and it’s survival. That would be opposing big tech, opposing immigration, and pushing for election integrity. If you can do all three it’s worthwhile to support you. If not you shouldn’t.
