Antifa, Just an Idea

Nope.
You're just giving the left more ammunition by killing them.

In a civil war however, all the rules go out the broken, smashed in window.
No, state does matter.
Texas or Florida for that matter. Even GA. You will bebetter off as that would be defense.
 
No, state does matter.
Texas or Florida for that matter. Even GA. You will bebetter off as that would be defense.
yeah, but they'd have to literal, finger on the trigger ready to shoot.
And you need lots of witnesses, because the left come in massive jerk circle mobs.
100-10000 a mob, I believe?
 
If ten dudes with Ar-15s showed up and mowed down every "protestor" who's threatening people with guns, these "protests" would end.

Probably a lot of violence would happen first. But we are going that direction anyways. Just get it over with already.
 
yeah, but they'd have to literal, finger on the trigger ready to shoot.
And you need lots of witnesses, because the left come in massive jerk circle mobs.
100-10000 a mob, I believe?
Uh...
Not really. Castle doctrine for both of them
 
If ten dudes with Ar-15s showed up and mowed down every "protestor" who's threatening people with guns, these "protests" would end.

Probably a lot of violence would happen first. But we are going that direction anyways. Just get it over with already.

No, it would lead to reprisals. Remember, antifa has elite support, deplorables dont. If shit does go down, none of that will matter any more, but until it does, the right has to be far more careful.
 
I'm not sure. It might be better to let them get overconfident, inevitably screw up and kill people. Give them enough rope to hang themselves is what I'm saying.

Of course, the downside of this is that it assumes that the MSM will cover the incident or not. Then again, if enough people are killed and they don't, it'll look really bad and suspicious on their end. On the other hand, we've seen with the BLM and Antifa 'Protests of Peace' how the media can look the other way and nothing happens. That said, I imagine there's gonna be a world of difference between a bunch of people opening fire on a crowd and some people getting killed off during a riot.
 
I'm not sure. It might be better to let them get overconfident, inevitably screw up and kill people. Give them enough rope to hang themselves is what I'm saying.

Of course, the downside of this is that it assumes that the MSM will cover the incident or not. Then again, if enough people are killed and they don't, it'll look really bad and suspicious on their end. On the other hand, we've seen with the BLM and Antifa 'Protests of Peace' how the media can look the other way and nothing happens. That said, I imagine there's gonna be a world of difference between a bunch of people opening fire on a crowd and some people getting killed off during a riot.
I think I was mostly speaking out of anger and frustration earlier today.

I want to see this play out in a way that ends with the right (or at least not the extremist left) winning...

But I had just watched the video of that guy with a gun trying to defend himself, and getting beaten by a mob of antifa, and I also want to see each of those fucking thugs catch A couple bullets.

I will say I'm not going to get beat down. They'll have to shoot me, and I'm taking some down with me.
 
I think I was mostly speaking out of anger and frustration earlier today.

I want to see this play out in a way that ends with the right (or at least not the extremist left) winning...

But I had just watched the video of that guy with a gun trying to defend himself, and getting beaten by a mob of antifa, and I also want to see each of those fucking thugs catch A couple bullets.

I will say I'm not going to get beat down. They'll have to shoot me, and I'm taking some down with me.
Patience; resistance is mounting, and people will eventually reach their breaking point. Not that I expect that anyone will be happy with what happens when they finally do.
 
I'm not sure. It might be better to let them get overconfident, inevitably screw up and kill people. Give them enough rope to hang themselves is what I'm saying.

They already have killed people. Dozens died in the Antifa/BLM riots, and then there's that poor guy out on the West coast that just straight up got shot.

MSMedia didn't pay a whole lot of attention to that now, did they?
 
They already have killed people. Dozens died in the Antifa/BLM riots, and then there's that poor guy out on the West coast that just straight up got shot.

MSMedia didn't pay a whole lot of attention to that now, did they?
The Boston Massacre didn't start the American Revolution; but the former did help to convince a lot of people that the latter may be necessary.
 
They already have killed people. Dozens died in the Antifa/BLM riots, and then there's that poor guy out on the West coast that just straight up got shot.

MSMedia didn't pay a whole lot of attention to that now, did they?
You missed the part where I clarified that it's one thing to hide the deaths of people who died in the chaos of riots and another to hide people opening fire on a crowd and killing dozens.
 
Depends on the state
Pretty sure this was a state that would treat the man like Wisconsin is treating Kyle Rittenhouse.

They already have killed people. Dozens died in the Antifa/BLM riots, and then there's that poor guy out on the West coast that just straight up got shot.

MSMedia didn't pay a whole lot of attention to that now, did they?
Kind of, but it was mostly to just call him a Nazi and imply the guy who shot him was right to do so.
 
Not a good idea.
Left control the country, so if you shoot them, it's your sorry ass in prison for the next 40 years.

Until this hits a state of full-blown civil war, do not shoot.
AKA do everything else but kill.

We are still 20-30 years or so away from the actual civil war period that accompies the end of a modern period.

we still have the next bigger populist revolt in 7-12 years or so which will be the last chance for a peaceful resolution to all this. And once the civil war periods start thats roughly 30 years of civil war across western civilization.

So you know not fun at all.
 
We are still 20-30 years or so away from the actual civil war period that accompies the end of a modern period.
How many modern periods have there been? From what I've seen over in the cyclical history thread, you're making these claims with remarkably specific timeframes based on all of one prior cycle in recorded history that stretches back to mythology.

I'd give you a lot more credit if you'd been making clear comparisons with the causation of the obviously cyclic nature of Chinese history, but constantly comparing the modern West to Rome when there wasn't actually a period of unity even approaching the Roman Republic and all sorts of basic structural differences exist, like economics ceasing to be land-driven making outright conquest of vanishingly limited use and the geographic scale having expanded to cross the damn Atlantic.
 
We are still 20-30 years or so away from the actual civil war period that accompies the end of a modern period.

we still have the next bigger populist revolt in 7-12 years or so which will be the last chance for a peaceful resolution to all this. And once the civil war periods start thats roughly 30 years of civil war across western civilization.

So you know not fun at all.
Given how the Left is going peddle to the metal these days, I’m doubtful it will take that long in either case...
 
I wonder if anything is going to happen over that person who refused to turn over machines in spite of a court order.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top