China's Trade War With Australia Backfiring With Rolling Blackouts Afflicting Country

Just for a clarification, with the talk Mahabharata before, do you claim that there was an advanced civilization with bronze age or steel age technology that was knocked down by the meteor or that there was industrial age civilization that was knocked down by the meteor?
I am claiming early to mid 19th Century level tech Civilization.
 
So probably multi-million population in one of the fertile regions, whose remains couldn't be so readily wiped away by the rising seas, as it would have spread too far.
 
Evidence would be hard to find actually. 12,000 years ago the total human population was around 200,000 people globally. That is on Eurasia, Africa, Australia, North America and South America. Most of which were still Hunter Gatherers. The people that began to build the first cities are at most barely 30,000. And the bulk of their civilization was in the levant and what is now Mediterranean Sea. Gomeckly Tepid alone proves they had some form of advanced tech from the stones they were using to build that complex. Not to mention the advanced math required to make the complex stable. It was not like today. There are over 7 Billion of us. But for them they were small enough to leave only two big cities above the waves. For context there are more people in my home County than they had period.

Now you're just hurting your position.

If the world's population was that low pre-impact not post-impact, there is an enormous stack of issues with trying to build the infrastructure for an industrialized civilization in the first place.

If this: Gobeklitepe - The World's First Temple near Sanliurfa, Turkey

Is what you're referring to, claiming that industrial-level technology is necessary to build such a thing or make it stable is patently absurd.

Have you not seen what the Romans built? The Greeks? The Chinese? Are you not aware of how much of what they built is still standing? Do you have no familiarity with late medieval architecture, much less age of sail?

You really aren't helping your position, and if you want to argue this further, it should go onto a new thread.
 
Now you're just hurting your position.

If the world's population was that low pre-impact not post-impact, there is an enormous stack of issues with trying to build the infrastructure for an industrialized civilization in the first place.

If this: Gobeklitepe - The World's First Temple near Sanliurfa, Turkey

Is what you're referring to, claiming that industrial-level technology is necessary to build such a thing or make it stable is patently absurd.

Have you not seen what the Romans built? The Greeks? The Chinese? Are you not aware of how much of what they built is still standing? Do you have no familiarity with late medieval architecture, much less age of sail?

You really aren't helping your position, and if you want to argue this further, it should go onto a new thread.
If you want to make a new thread then fine. But I believe what I believe and you believe what you believe. And nether of us are gonna change our minds so it would be a moot point. Plus I am at work on my phone so I don't want to keep typing on it.
 
Evidence would be hard to find actually. 12,000 years ago the total human population was around 200,000 people globally. That is on Eurasia, Africa, Australia, North America and South America. Most of which were still Hunter Gatherers. The people that began to build the first cities are at most barely 30,000. And the bulk of their civilization was in the levant and what is now Mediterranean Sea. Gomeckly Tepid alone proves they had some form of advanced tech from the stones they were using to build that complex. Not to mention the advanced math required to make the complex stable. It was not like today. There are over 7 Billion of us. But for them they were small enough to leave only two big cities above the waves. For context there are more people in my home County than they had period.

Remains of advanced stone-age or even bronze cyvilisation which built first cities could be destroyed or not found yet.
Especially if they lived in places under sea now.
Even Atlantide is plausible/some islands on Atlantic sunk recently/

But Mahabharata - like cyvilisation with UFO/superplanes, A/H bombs and flying cities ? if it existed,we would found it.
 
Im pretty sure atlantis is just another way to refer to the lost minoian culture that we have already found.
 
Im pretty sure atlantis is just another way to refer to the lost minoian culture that we have already found.
Except they weren't beyond the Pillars of Hercules. Which was another name for The Straits of Gibraltar. And Plato already knew about the Minoians. Everyone in the Levant did.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top