Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby
You might want to check out some of the laws that were put in place after the end of the US Civil War. The Laws are already on the books to deal with a Democrats going crazy scenario. And it will not be pretty for the side trying to start one. Deep down those in power know what will happen to THEM if they try and pull that trigger. The ball would be in Trumps court and they know it.

Democrats are already guilty of blatant violations of the constitution .
 

Sailor.X

Cold War Veteran
Founder
Democrats are already guilty of blatant violations of the constitution .
Again perception is reality. Remember when you pull a trigger it is not to people on the internet who discuss this stuff multiple times a day. You must do it when the Joe average person who is not on the internet all day and works a day in day out job. Those are the ones you need to convince when you do it. I have to state this one more time for everyone here. We are in an Echo Chamber just as much as the left is. Don't assume what you see and what the general public see is the same thing. If and when the trigger is pulled it would be for something obvious to the General Public not just us.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Again perception is reality. Remember when you pull a trigger it is not to people on the internet who discuss this stuff multiple times a day. You must do it when the Joe average person who is not on the internet all day and works a day in day out job. Those are the ones you need to convince when you do it. I have to state this one more time for everyone here. We are in an Echo Chamber just as much as the left is. Don't assume what you see and what the general public see is the same thing. If and when the trigger is pulled it would be for something obvious to the General Public not just us.
Your word in God's ear, I really don't want to see the worst come to pass.
 

The Original Sixth

Well-known member
Founder
Because things weren't chaotic enough, there is now evidence the Democrats are honestly planning a complete shitshow if they don't get it their way.


This is the article they are talking about. The fact the NYT published this as a ending paragraph without ANYONE stopping and saying "wait do you guys realize how fucking serious this would be?" is baffling.



A couple of issues.

First, is the fact that the House itself may not support Pelosi:


To quote:

The word “immediately” means that the current Congress would choose. That, in turn, would seem to mean Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and the majority Democrats would prevail, and pick Biden.
Not so fast: the 12th Amendment goes further. “But in choosing the President,” it says, “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote” (emphasis added).
While there are 435 representatives, there will only be 50 votes. And a current tally of representatives in each state shows that there are more Republican-majority delegations than Democrat-majority delegations. Republicans control 26 delegations; Democrats dominate 23; Michigan is evenly split 7-7.

Unless a state delegation went rogue, then Trump would at worst lose 26 to 24 and most possibly by 27 to 23. If the White House and the Senate support Trump as president and if then a House vote would come up in favor of Trump, the Democrats would have no positive claim on the White House.

More notably

But Mr. Podesta, playing Mr. Biden, shocked the organizers by saying he felt his party wouldn’t let him concede. Alleging voter suppression, he persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan to send pro-Biden electors to the Electoral College.

In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned. The House named Mr. Biden president; the Senate and White House stuck with Mr. Trump. At that point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the media for cues, and waited to see what the military would do.


California, Oregon, and Washington lack the means of seceding from the Union. And the mere fact that they can't count on any but those three states to secede is rather telling just how weak their hand actually is.
 

The Original Sixth

Well-known member
Founder
Remember, Biden hasn't just been visibly having problems remaining articulate, he also has problems controlling his temper. Trump has an impressive ability to needle people.

I think Biden will avoid debating at all costs. Looking weak is far better than being exposed as not just partially senile, but also incapable of restraining yourself. Youtube can't do enough censoring to keep the footage of a debate from being widespread, and unless Biden actually is a lot more coherent than he's seemed, that would be the absolute death knell.

A good take. I agree it is a better strategy to avoid the debates and look weak, on the pretense of being too moral to be debate Trump, but I think there is a deeper dimension that most people don't take into account; Kenya West is technically running for President. Now, we are all probably right in assuming he can't possibly win, even if he pulls a few electors to his side.

However, if Biden doesn't show up, then Trump can still hold the debates. That changes the frame; instead of Biden looking weak to avoid looking completely incapable and incompetent, the new frame will be that Joe Biden isn't even serious about running against Trump. Because the frame as most people understand it is that whoever the people debating in September and October are, they are the two people running. So if Biden ducks out, then the natural frame is that the race is actually between Trump and West, not Trump and Biden.

The media will try and counter that narrative, but the fact is that Trump has tradition on his side; people will watch the debates. In fact, people will watch simply to see who will make the bigger ass out of themselves. The level of damage that can do to the Democrat narrative is deep. So deep in fact, that I suspect that if Trump does make this move and he does debate West, then Biden and his team will be forced to attend the other debates, while demanding special treatment. Because if they don't, no amount of voter fraud is going to save them or delay a Trump victory.

West will steal so many votes from Biden that those marginal push victories that any cheater might try to slide into the system will not make up for their losses. That's on top of the socialists not being willing to vote and rioting instead. Letting Trump set the narrative with West would be the greatest political disaster within the past 4 years for the Democrats.
 

Yinko

Well-known member
In 2016 Trump lost the popular election by 3m votes, that's about or 4% of the voting population at the time. That doesn't seem like a lot to me. Given what we've seen with increases in Black and Hispanic support recently, what do you think are the chances of him winning both the popular and electoral?

I ask, because one of the main assumptions the Democrats have about opposing Trump is that he will lose the popular vote, which they will then use to contest him in various ways. If he wins by both metrics, their position to contest becomes a lot weaker.
 

MelancholicMechanicus

Thought Criminal
In 2016 Trump lost the popular election by 3m votes, that's about or 4% of the voting population at the time. That doesn't seem like a lot to me. Given what we've seen with increases in Black and Hispanic support recently, what do you think are the chances of him winning both the popular and electoral?

I ask, because one of the main assumptions the Democrats have about opposing Trump is that he will lose the popular vote, which they will then use to contest him in various ways. If he wins by both metrics, their position to contest becomes a lot weaker.

America is a republic, not a democracy. The Dems can cry all they want but the fact is the system is working exactly as it was meant to: keep the huge population centers from controlling the entire country. You can't ignore the rules and then cry when the opponent won't accept your monopoly get out of jail card in poker.

As for the assumption Trump can't win the popular vote, that is based on nothing but wishing. They simply cannot accept that Trump might win fair and square. They are already rationalizing for that because it's the only way they can see him winning at all.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
In 2016 Trump lost the popular election by 3m votes, that's about or 4% of the voting population at the time. That doesn't seem like a lot to me. Given what we've seen with increases in Black and Hispanic support recently, what do you think are the chances of him winning both the popular and electoral?

I ask, because one of the main assumptions the Democrats have about opposing Trump is that he will lose the popular vote, which they will then use to contest him in various ways. If he wins by both metrics, their position to contest becomes a lot weaker.

There's basically no reason whatsoever to think that Trump hasn't increased, rather than decreased, in popularity with most demographics.

Biden, on the other hand, has basically nothing that Hillary didn't have, except for visible mental deterioration. And unlike Hillary, he doesn't have the gender card.

We are very likely looking at a landslide. Nothing is certain until election day, but this is absolutely the direction we're heading in. If God smiles on us, we may get a massive crackdown on voter fraud as well.
 

Typhonis

Well-known member
You know....if Trump wants the Dems to tank mail in voting....why not include a Donald Trump postage stamp on the mail in ballot?
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
You know....if Trump wants the Dems to tank mail in voting....why not include a Donald Trump postage stamp on the mail in ballot?
Babylon Bee beat you to it.

 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby
Babylon Bee beat you to it.

He's doing this too.

614c2f08e76888e4bcf7e4b36bc0df2f3669aa23_2_690x390.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top