Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Megadeath

Well-known member
Let’s be honest everybody, nobody on either side of the aisle really cares about allegations of sexual harassment, rape, or any other nonsense like that unless a political opponent is accused of it. And, also to be honest, we really shouldn’t care. Who becomes president of the USA can determine the fate of billions of people around the world, can mean the difference between war or peace, between prosperity and poverty, between freedom and oppression. If you support the policies of a candidate, if you think his presidency would be better for the nation and the world, then it’s completely irrational to care whether or not he groped some girls. Also, when it comes to not only someone rich and famous, but a politician who is opposed by powerful forces and organizations, they can find as many women to accuse him of impropriety as need be.
I very strongly disagree. I'm Australian, not American, so we don't have the same ridiculous exaggeration of position that the American system is forced into by the false dichotomy of their two party system. I say this, because maybe I would feel different if I viewed every local election as the last stand for the nation's soul like a lot of Americans on both sides seem to. I personally think even with that system the whole "Must win, do or die." attitude I see is silly, and that regardless of which party is in power you'll generally see four more years of basically the same thing.

Regardless, I would vote for a decent man who honestly held different political opinions any day, over an odious person who aligned perfectly with my position. The government represents the country, to itself and to the world. What your saying sounds alot like "The ends justify the means." and that will always be a disgusting principle. I'd rather die tomorrow as a decent man with my head held high, than live forever ashamed of myself. I hold my country and others to that same standard too. If I personally had to choose between success for my country by embracing awful attitudes or to see it fail with integrity and honour, it's no hard choice at all.

For the people who've asked "What's wrong with Trump anyway?" Well, you could ask his friends. Except, he doesn't have any. Everyone he's ever been close to personally either turns on him in the end, or gets thrown under the bus from Epstein to Scaramucci. He has "allies" and "associates" not friends, because to a sociopathic narcissist like Trump other people are just stepping stones. They say you can judge a man by his foes as much as his friends, and there's a reason those categories can be summed up as "Just about anyone who ever knew him." and "Pretty much no one."

Or, if we want to look at the more sensational issues that haven't already been gone over there's his cynical manipulation of religion, his disgusting attitude towards the military, and his desire to screw his own daughter.

Trump is not a religious man. He does not attend church service, he does not consider himself answerable to a higher power, or concern himself with scripture. I'm personally a slightly agnostic Christian, with my own issues about the (many, various) churches as institutions of men, and even the bible as a product of man. That said, I've never used violent force to clear a protest so I could pose for cameras with a bible. Or we could just look at the seven deadly sins; pride ("With the exception of the late, great Abraham Lincoln, I can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office.") greed (I don't do it for the money. I've got enough, much more than I'll ever need.), lust (You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."), envy ("US President Donald Trump has said he was only 'kidding' when he told Fox News he wished Americans would 'sit up at attention' when he speaks, like North Koreans do with Kim Jong-un.") gluttony ("According to Conley, Trump weighs 244 pounds. At 6 feet, three inches tall that puts him over the threshold for obesity set by the U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute"), wrath (“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart, right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”) and sloth ("Since taking office on Jan. 20, 2017, Mr. Trump has reportedly been on the grounds of his golf courses or played golf elsewhere 302 times since becoming President." - DJT: "We pay for Obama's travel so he can fundraise millions so Democrats can run on lies. Then we pay for his golf.") He literally hits up every major sin. He revels in most of them.

Then there's his relationship to the military, which is just as disgusting, and entirely in line with a third world little tinpot dictator. He attended a military school. He should have learned the basics of integrity and service, but by all accounts all he learned was how to use his families money to get women to party. When the time came that his service was called upon, that same money was used to find unscrupulous private doctors who'd shield him from the needs of his country. That's sad enough, but that he then used his public platform to call people who did fight and suffer and die for their country losers, because they weren't "smart" enough to avoid responsibility? That man, who denigrated the parents of a child lost in overseas conflict, who belittled every service member with his comment that “I like people who weren't captured” then wants to waste many millions of tax payer dollars to hold ridiculous Russian style military parades in his own honour? He's pathetic, and unworthy even to salute the flag of the country he purportedly serves.

And finally, there's "that" comment. "I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." And that's just the tip of that iceberg. Here's an entire article; All Donald Trump's creepiest comments about his daughter Ivanka
I'll share a few choice quotes for those too lazy to read ideas they disagree with though.
Stern: “By the way, your daughter…”
Trump: “ - she’s beautiful"
Stern: “Can I say this? A piece of ass.”
Trump: “Yeah.”
"Ivanka is a great, great beauty. Every guy in the country wants to go out with my daughter."
“My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body."
“After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, ‘Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . .’”
But all of those aside, to anyone reading this who like me, has a daughter; would you ever tell her that you'd be happy to date her if you weren't related? If not, if you saw one of your parents on international television making those kinds of remarks about you, would you think it was even slightly appropriate? I can tell you right now, if my mother ever implied she'd considered the possibility of dating me, I would be aghast.

Finally, there's all the people who say "Yes, he is awful, but he's the only one who stands for what I want!" and I think you all should consider what that means. If the only person who'll fight for what you believe in is someone who all but pisses on the sanctity of the church, who makes a mockery of traditional values and family life with his multiple divorces and perverted interest in his daughter, who treats the armed forces he leads like a little boy playing with toy soldiers... Well, maybe what you want isn't something worth fighting for. I know that most people won't even read this far, and even if they do they probably won't change their mind. But I do hope that at the very least you might see that opposition to Trump can be based on different opinions and beliefs, rather than some ridiculous conspiracy theory that believes in your own "truths" but is more interested in defeating the common people for unscrupulous reasons. That's just tinfoil hat lunacy.
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
No,he did not.That number is fraud.and even if that was true,important thing are states,not number of votes.He could lost that 5 million in few states,but if win in others,he still is President.
Fraud hasn't been demonstrated even to the low level needed for a civil law suit. Most legal actions haven't even tried to allege it, with Giuliani himself specifically distancing himself from the claim when under oath rathet than speaking freely in public.

As to your aside about the peculiarities of the American electoral system, what's your point? Biden won enough of those too. He won so much more than enough that even if every current legal action resulted in reversal rather than cancellation of the electoral votes of the states where they're happening, Trump would still lose. There's a reason that even Giuliani is talking about giving up the long shot of the legal system and going for the ridiculous hail Mary of influencing the legislators.
 

GoldRanger

May the power protect you
Founder
Fraud hasn't been demonstrated even to the low level needed for a civil law suit. Most legal actions haven't even tried to allege it, with Giuliani himself specifically distancing himself from the claim when under oath rathet than speaking freely in public.

I see it's Broken Record Time again. Yes, we've been over this a few times already. The lawsuits do not allege fraud because intent is monstrously difficult to prove, especially in the very limited time frame they have. Instead, they opt for a lesser charge of irregularities of sufficient size to change the final result. Which doesn't mean there was no fraud, merely that, unlike the left, the right knows how to pick its battles.
 

Sir 1000

Shitlord
I very strongly disagree. I'm Australian, not American, so we don't have the same ridiculous exaggeration of position that the American system is forced into by the false dichotomy of their two party system. I say this, because maybe I would feel different if I viewed every local election as the last stand for the nation's soul like a lot of Americans on both sides seem to. I personally think even with that system the whole "Must win, do or die." attitude I see is silly, and that regardless of which party is in power you'll generally see four more years of basically the same thing.

Regardless, I would vote for a decent man who honestly held different political opinions any day, over an odious person who aligned perfectly with my position. The government represents the country, to itself and to the world. What your saying sounds alot like "The ends justify the means." and that will always be a disgusting principle. I'd rather die tomorrow as a decent man with my head held high, than live forever ashamed of myself. I hold my country and others to that same standard too. If I personally had to choose between success for my country by embracing awful attitudes or to see it fail with integrity and honour, it's no hard choice at all.

For the people who've asked "What's wrong with Trump anyway?" Well, you could ask his friends. Except, he doesn't have any. Everyone he's ever been close to personally either turns on him in the end, or gets thrown under the bus from Epstein to Scaramucci. He has "allies" and "associates" not friends, because to a sociopathic narcissist like Trump other people are just stepping stones. They say you can judge a man by his foes as much as his friends, and there's a reason those categories can be summed up as "Just about anyone who ever knew him." and "Pretty much no one."

Or, if we want to look at the more sensational issues that haven't already been gone over there's his cynical manipulation of religion, his disgusting attitude towards the military, and his desire to screw his own daughter.

Trump is not a religious man. He does not attend church service, he does not consider himself answerable to a higher power, or concern himself with scripture. I'm personally a slightly agnostic Christian, with my own issues about the (many, various) churches as institutions of men, and even the bible as a product of man. That said, I've never used violent force to clear a protest so I could pose for cameras with a bible. Or we could just look at the seven deadly sins; pride ("With the exception of the late, great Abraham Lincoln, I can be more presidential than any president that's ever held this office.") greed (I don't do it for the money. I've got enough, much more than I'll ever need.), lust (You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."), envy ("US President Donald Trump has said he was only 'kidding' when he told Fox News he wished Americans would 'sit up at attention' when he speaks, like North Koreans do with Kim Jong-un.") gluttony ("According to Conley, Trump weighs 244 pounds. At 6 feet, three inches tall that puts him over the threshold for obesity set by the U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute"), wrath (“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart, right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”) and sloth ("Since taking office on Jan. 20, 2017, Mr. Trump has reportedly been on the grounds of his golf courses or played golf elsewhere 302 times since becoming President." - DJT: "We pay for Obama's travel so he can fundraise millions so Democrats can run on lies. Then we pay for his golf.") He literally hits up every major sin. He revels in most of them.

Then there's his relationship to the military, which is just as disgusting, and entirely in line with a third world little tinpot dictator. He attended a military school. He should have learned the basics of integrity and service, but by all accounts all he learned was how to use his families money to get women to party. When the time came that his service was called upon, that same money was used to find unscrupulous private doctors who'd shield him from the needs of his country. That's sad enough, but that he then used his public platform to call people who did fight and suffer and die for their country losers, because they weren't "smart" enough to avoid responsibility? That man, who denigrated the parents of a child lost in overseas conflict, who belittled every service member with his comment that “I like people who weren't captured” then wants to waste many millions of tax payer dollars to hold ridiculous Russian style military parades in his own honour? He's pathetic, and unworthy even to salute the flag of the country he purportedly serves.

And finally, there's "that" comment. "I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." And that's just the tip of that iceberg. Here's an entire article; All Donald Trump's creepiest comments about his daughter Ivanka
I'll share a few choice quotes for those too lazy to read ideas they disagree with though.
Stern: “By the way, your daughter…”
Trump: “ - she’s beautiful"
Stern: “Can I say this? A piece of ass.”
Trump: “Yeah.”
"Ivanka is a great, great beauty. Every guy in the country wants to go out with my daughter."
“My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body."
“After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, ‘Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . .’”
But all of those aside, to anyone reading this who like me, has a daughter; would you ever tell her that you'd be happy to date her if you weren't related? If not, if you saw one of your parents on international television making those kinds of remarks about you, would you think it was even slightly appropriate? I can tell you right now, if my mother ever implied she'd considered the possibility of dating me, I would be aghast.

Finally, there's all the people who say "Yes, he is awful, but he's the only one who stands for what I want!" and I think you all should consider what that means. If the only person who'll fight for what you believe in is someone who all but pisses on the sanctity of the church, who makes a mockery of traditional values and family life with his multiple divorces and perverted interest in his daughter, who treats the armed forces he leads like a little boy playing with toy soldiers... Well, maybe what you want isn't something worth fighting for. I know that most people won't even read this far, and even if they do they probably won't change their mind. But I do hope that at the very least you might see that opposition to Trump can be based on different opinions and beliefs, rather than some ridiculous conspiracy theory that believes in your own "truths" but is more interested in defeating the common people for unscrupulous reasons. That's just tinfoil hat lunacy.
That's a whole lot of shit to simply say you are pretending to be a 'centrist' and orange man bad because i'm 'neutral'. Do you honestly believe this half-wittery that you espouse?
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
I see it's Broken Record Time again. Yes, we've been over this a few times already. The lawsuits do not allege fraud because intent is monstrously difficult to prove, especially in the very limited time frame they have. Instead, they opt for a lesser charge of irregularities of sufficient size to change the final result. Which doesn't mean there was no fraud, merely that, unlike the left, the right knows how to pick its battles.
Except, in a civil suit the standard is "On the balance of probability." rather than "Beyond reasonable doubt." The fact that the Trump legal team don't think it's likely enough to even try to prove it's more likely fraud occurred isn't clever legal maneuvering. They'd have little to lose if they tried to run the case. At worst they're hit with the other sides legal costs, and that's peanuts against what they've already spent, or compared as a cost/benefit against them winning. That is, unless they themselves believe there's literally zero chance of them proving that fraud is the more likely explanation. Given the supposed bullet proof "evidence" bought up in this very thread, what do you think that means? To me it says they investigated it themselves and found it implausible. We already know that the Trump team rejected plenty of other affidavits as untrue.

That's a whole lot of shit to simply say you are pretending to be a 'centrist' and orange man bad because i'm 'neutral'. Do you honestly believe this half-wittery that you espouse?
Wow, I don't think of myself as centrist, left, or right. I think the division of political ideology into a single linear spectrum is a way to simplify things for idiots. Why should my point of view regarding taxing big business have any correlation with my opinion on abortion? What exactly do you think you can predict about my stance on gun rights, from how I feel about foreign policy regarding China? That's the false dichotomy of the American two party system that I mentioned. Political position is governed by at least a three axis space, considering domestic policy, foreign policy and fiscal policy. Even that would be a simplified model.

That said, you just looked (apparently) at a long list of critiques of someone you presumably support, and you're going to dismiss them without any regard, because they come from someone you believe comes from a political space you don't inhabit? That's pathetic. If you don't have an answer to the issues, at least have the balls to say you don't care if an incestuous, heathen coward represents you as long as he whistles loud enough.
 

Sir 1000

Shitlord
Except, in a civil suit the standard is "On the balance of probability." rather than "Beyond reasonable doubt." The fact that the Trump legal team don't think it's likely enough to even try to prove it's more likely fraud occurred isn't clever legal maneuvering. They'd have little to lose if they tried to run the case. At worst they're hit with the other sides legal costs, and that's peanuts against what they've already spent, or compared as a cost/benefit against them winning. That is, unless they themselves believe there's literally zero chance of them proving that fraud is the more likely explanation. Given the supposed bullet proof "evidence" bought up in this very thread, what do you think that means? To me it says they investigated it themselves and found it implausible. We already know that the Trump team rejected plenty of other affidavits as untrue.


Wow, I don't think of myself as centrist, left, or right. I think the division of political ideology into a single linear spectrum is a way to simplify things for idiots. Why should my point of view regarding taxing big business have any correlation with my opinion on abortion? What exactly do you think you can predict about my stance on gun rights, from how I feel about foreign policy regarding China? That's the false dichotomy of the American two party system that I mentioned. Political position is governed by at least a three axis space, considering domestic policy, foreign policy and fiscal policy. Even that would be a simplified model.

That said, you just looked (apparently) at a long list of critiques of someone you presumably support, and you're going to dismiss them without any regard, because they come from someone you believe comes from a political space you don't inhabit? That's pathetic. If you don't have an answer to the issues, at least have the balls to say you don't care if an incestuous, heathen coward represents you as long as he whistles loud enough.
In other words you are a pretentious and bloviating fool? Guy complemented his daughter? I'm supposed to not vote for him over the guy on tape making out with his niece? Not merely saying something creepy but doing it in an alzhimered fugue? I don't have an answer to you're 'issues' because they have been addressed repeatedly and you will either ignore them or use an appeal to authority in msm. I have been through this song and dance before. I also like many conservatives don't give a damn about religion. But if you keep trying i'm sure you will find the magic words to make me agree with you. What's you're commie tag on sb? I like to know which lefty troll im dealing with?
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
In other words you are a pretentious and bloviating fool? Guy complemented his daughter? I'm supposed to not vote for him over the guy on tape making out with his niece? Not merely saying something creepy but doing it in an alzhimered fugue? I don't have an answer to you're 'issues' because they have been addressed repeatedly and you will either ignore them or use an appeal to authority in msm. I have been through this song and dance before. I also like many conservatives don't give a damn about religion. But if you keep trying i'm sure you will find the magic words to make me agree with you. What's you're commie tag on sb? I like to know which lefty troll im dealing with?
Hey, what you put there at the end is not allowed! I would recommend editing it!
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
I think you're allowed to ask? You just can't out them, that's their decision.

But with so many changes lately, who knows. Maybe a mod will be in a bad mood and slap him Anyways.
I was getting you shouldn't bring it up.
 

The Original Sixth

Well-known member
Founder
Given that the man seems to have lost by 5 million+, unlikely.

And this is why Commies always ending up showing their fascist colors. A deep seated unwillingness to do basic math.

Trump needs to overturn only a few hundred thousand votes.

Pennsylvania -- 93,000
Wisconsin -- 20,000
Michigan -- 150,000
Georgia -- 13,000
Arizona -- 11,000
 

The Original Sixth

Well-known member
Founder
Her story didn't fall apart. I watched the entirety of the confirmation. Her story was completely coherent.

Like when she told her therapist that it was four boys who did it, but then later changed it to two?

It was confirmed by others that she had spoken of the attack years before he became a prominent figure.

Like her husband.

And...um...who else?

Oh right! The friend who said that no such attack happened, who didn't even know the alleged, was pressured into giving false testimony, and said she thought Ford was full of shit.


I know when I put my star witness up for a he-said, she-said case, I want her to be blown out of the water by her own friend in relation to the incident.


Kavanagh is a rapist, and when he almost had to face the harsh consequence of not getting to be on the supreme court, he sobbed like a baby and threatened the Senate.

As opposed to commies, who only sob and threaten people when they're required to work for a living.

But let's be honest about what really happened.

Kavanagh didn't rape her. He used her. Because she was 15, stupid, and thought she could catch him if she did a bit "extra". And that might have been as simple as her giving him a hummer. And when he didn't call her back the following week, she realized what happened.

But at the time, she probably couldn't admit going to the party without getting in trouble. And she didn't want to admit that she had done something sexual for a boy. So instead, she invented a story where she was "almost raped" to explain her trauma. And she didn't name names and didn't want to make a fuss about it, because she knew an investigation would have revealed her to be a liar.

And so she shelved it. She only brought it back when Kavanagh was put up by Donald Trump. Trump, being the man who had used countless women for sex and Kavanagh, the man who had done it to her. And at last, she finally felt she could strike back at the man who had wounded her.

Of course, because her story was old and had morphed over the years, like a foul weed, she got some of the details wrong from what she had told her therapist. And her friend, who had initially supported her, because Ford had told her all about it when they were younger, probably did some digging and realized that it hadn't happened and that she had a thing for Kavanagh when they were younger and guessed the real motivation.

The failure of the Republicans to convict Trump is predicatble. They are spineless and believe in nothing. The "evidence" of fraud seems to be twitter posts and youtube videos from randos.

Lol, the Democrats had no case against Trump. It was so weak that Pelosi didn't even want to send it to the Senate. She was forced to when they threatened to dismiss her impeachment in its entirety. We then got to watch the most weak-ass bullshit get dragged across the Senate floor and getting utterly destroyed for it.

The minutes did not support Trump blackmailing anyone. The PM of Ukraine claimed that he had not been blackmailed or otherwise pressured. And we have proof from Biden himself that he DID pressure the Ukrainian government by threatening to pull military aid to their country if they didn't end the investigation. Biden literally said that on TV, to reporters. And at the time, questions were raised with Hunter Biden's connections to his father and those companies.

But Trump is the villain for wanting to open up an investigation into Biden and his son for this rather appalling behavior in Ukraine?

Of course it got shot down. It didn't even come close to reaching the mark needed to oust Trump.
 
Last edited:

Spartan303

In Captain America we Trust!
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Osaul
Kavanagh didn't rape her. He used her. Because she was 15, stupid, and thought she could catch him if she did a bit "extra". And that might have been as simple as her giving him a hummer. And when he didn't call her back the following week, she realized what happened.


I'm not sure if even that happened. If I recall correctly most said there wasn't any interaction between them.
 

mesonoxian

Well-known member
You overestimate how much the average voter cares to keep up with who's who in politics and what they've done recently when it comes to primaries friend. I've little doubt that most saw the same name they'd voted for before and simply did so again without bothering to check if anything had changed.

Repeatedly saying one won an election one lost is a cross party thing friend. The existence of Stacy Abrams alone will tell you that much. Of course the difference between her and Trump is that he's actually legally contesting it rather then not doing so and still claiming he won. Funny that.


Did he now? Or did he simply say that when one is rich and powerful women are more open to advances while speaking in an off the cuff manner with friends? And bluntly no, it does not actually render it believable not even remotely close. If you're a rich/powerful person the only way you're avoiding accusations of that nature is if you go full Mike Pence and never stay alone with a woman. Also conman? If the dude were an actual conman he'd have long since been in jail by now after every security agency did all that it could to find anything they could hang him with and failed miserably.
Apparently the voters of Alabama (including the Republican voters) did care about who was running. It was the party establishment that went all in on supporting a known pedophile. That didn't stop the more delusional supporters from insisting he won anyway, and that God was going to miraculously overturn the election results.

Stacey Abrams is involved in a runoff as mandated by state law. That is very different from trying to get votes thrown out.

He said he "doesn't even wait". The reports from the women who claimed he assaulted him (and have since well before he was a Republican) have been exactly that. That he kissed and groped them with no provocation. When someone tells you what they are, you should listen.

And never go full Mike Pence.
Basically, despite news reports that might say otherwise, the Kracken is still on going and will be back with a vengence.
This is the same woman with the imaginary raid in Germany. Nothing is going to come of this, except her raising her profile amongst the Alex Jones/QAnon/MAGA set and profiting off their credulousness.

While we're at it



There's like half a dozen of different photos of Creepy Joe kissing his granddaughter on the lips in public.

"He kissed his granddaughter, he must be a pedophile!" The desperation to create a moral equivalency between supporting Trump and other political positions is thick in here.
Also conman? If the dude were an actual conman he'd have long since been in jail by now after every security agency did all that it could to find anything they could hang him with and failed miserably.
This explains so much. The assumption that anybody not in prison must be honest says loads about how the right treats grifters like Trump, Powell, and Giuliani.

Trump had an existence before he became the focal point for every angry white dude in the US' sense of inadequacy. He's been well known as a racist since the 1970s and 80s since he was discriminating against black renters. He is known for not paying contractors who work for him and using bankruptcy to stiff creditors. He was fined 25 million dollars for "Trump University" where he charged people for utterly bogus "lessons" of no value. That's before getting into the very hinky stuff involving somehow losing money on a casino in Atlantic city, and his questtionable dealings with Russian investors that are merely highliy indicative instead of actually proven. He's put his name on a ton of shitty, overpriced products, because literally all that matters to the man is making a buck and getting attention. And he sold a whole lot of people on the idea that he was a political outsider who would oppose corruption, while he flew around with Jeff Epstein.
And this is why Commies always ending up showing their fascist colors. A deep seated unwillingness to do basic math.

Trump needs to overturn only a few hundred thousand votes.

Pennsylvania -- 93,000
Wisconsin -- 20,000
Michigan -- 150,000
Georgia -- 13,000
Arizona -- 11,000
This is hilarious. "You're a fascist because you brought up Trump losing the popular vote, and not just the hundreds of thousands of legal votes we have to suppress for him to steal the election!"

An unsourced tweet isn't meaningful, and it is irrelevant what Dominion machines might have done, since Trump lost the hand recount.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top