Well i mean lets see.
The Anti-Semetic rhetoric was a common feature
Anti-semetic rhetoric has never been a feature of the American Right Wing or Conservatives. Hell, the US has many sin, but the ONE thing we maanged to generally avoid was Antisemetism on both sides for the most part. Now, if you wanted to accuse the American Right Wing of historically being anti-catholic, that has a much stronger case.
Massive support of the military, jingoism,
This is hardly a distinct feature of right wing politics. The Soviet Union and Maoist China also had a lot of jingoism and public support of the military. So did Ancient Rome. It's a pretty typical facet of government.
homosexuals in concentration camps,
Denigration of homosexuals was an all encompassing sport of all parts of the political spectrum prior to the 1960s. Plenty of highly left wing government and actors persecuted homosexuals, see Che, for instance.
minorities in concentration camps,
. . .
Look... this... this is probably one of the most hilarious arguments for being "right wing" I've seen in the context of Fascism and Nazis ever. Seeing how the two most Progressive Presidents in US history to that point (FDR and Wilson) BOTH actually RAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR ETHNIC MINORITIES. Like... literally no right wing President has ran an ethnicity based concentration camp in US history. All actual, literal concentration camps in US history have been run by left wing Democrats.
privatising government owned utilities,
Congratulations, one right wing position so far.
sucking the fat schlong of corporate interests,
As I already pointed out, corporatism and government support the interests of big businesses are not actually a right wing position in the US. The American right wing is fairly anti-regulation, yes, but not because of any preference for corporations, but due to the systemic ideological opposition to overly large and involved governments.
literal breeding centres for women,
Repeat after me: Handmaiden's Tail is no way an accurate reflection of what the religious right believes in or wants. Such an idea of a "breeding center" goes against almost ALL American right wing and conservative viewpoints on the structure of society and is much more reflective of early 20th century eugenics movements (which, note, were opposed by the social conservatives of their day and to this day) than anything to do with right wing politics.
distinctly low opinions of other ethnicities,
Like how you lowered the bar to "having low opinions of other ethnicities"; however, even this is not a feature of the American right wing, if anything, the American right wing thinks other ethnicities are entirely capable as one another. They're not the ones who push for special handouts and rules for people based on ethnicity after all, rather, they seek to tear those down. They ever have a term for it: "The soft bigotry of low expectations."
imprisoning the socialists, not imprisoning the monarchists, not imprisoning the conservatives...
Well, seeing how the American political spectrum doesn't really even HAVE monarchists on it, I don't think we can legitimately compare them... though I think the American Right Wing is actually quite staunchly anti-monarchists seeing how they quite firmly embrace the ideals of the American Founding and those precepts, which are just mildly anti-monarchical for some reason. But you're really focusing on the entire "imprisoning the socialists" thing and standing it in for opposition to socialists. But merely because two groups share an enemy does not mean they are allies, nor does it mean they are necessarily fellow travelers. Again, this is just guilt by association. I mean, by the standard of "opposing some third political position" the nationalists and communists of China must be ideologically the same, since they both opposed the Imperialism of Japan. Yeah... see... that just doesn't work.
Please do... you've yet to even acknowledge or engage with my post outlining how the American right wing shares little to no ideological or policy positions with Fascism or Nazism beyond a flippant attempt at guilt by association.
