Feds

[Husky_Khan]

You did read the responses to the thread, and understand the context, correct? Bacle was responding to the question:

Yes... the direct chain of quotations...

There's a difference between everyone being Feds in the group and the very well known fact that a significant minority of membership in White Nationalist groups are government informants/undercover agents wasting taxpayer money. It would be worrying if they are trying to engage in false flags (ie encouraging this nonsense) or trying to entrap individuals (ala Ruby Ridge).

I'm sure they are. It's just that the left wing groups like ANTIFA are considerably larger, and mostly just LARP as revolutionaries...so it's harder to catch than the neo-nazi types. They're a smaller group, with a history of violence, and likely contain a higher percentage of violent individuals. Easier to catch. You just see more violence in general from the likes of ANTIFA lately, because there are a lot more of them, so while the majority of them are not actually violent, you see more violent incidents because there are so many of them.

This isn't me defending ANTIFA either. Fuck antifa. They're just harder to catch because a majority of them are just LARPing soy boys and blue haired lesbians who won't do anything but shout and reee in the streets. Neo-nazis, as awful as they are, seem more motivated to go out and get shit done. And by "get shit done," I mean commit acts of violence.

Let's be real. Antifa commits acts of terror, and has some terrible and violent bad actors. However, the majority of them are just spoiled middle class white kids who just want to larp and tell their parents to fuck off.

...Maybe I missed it, but can you list some neo-nazi initiated violence in the last 20 years?

Dylan Roof ring a bell?

What militia group did he belong to and how would Federal infiltration work to prevent it?

I respect and understand your point of view but I wasn't shifting goal posts. I was fully remaining on topic and don't see why I should be criticized for following a conversations topic faithfully even if five or six posts were made. But yes, it is a moot point since Abhorsen (and yourself of which I had no issue with) already addressed it.

I suspect, however, that you are already well aware of this. If you're going to take pot shots and try to troll Bacle, try a little harder. This lazy and low effort attempt is as transparent as it gets.

Before you go all white knighting on him, I can only recall one (or maybe two threads, probably the same topic though) where I've been adversarial with Bacle, at least to the point that it's actually memorable to me personally. If he feels I'm persecuting him based on our interactions on a single previous topic, then that's just hilarious. Plus it's an emoji and a one liner, I didn't even register it was Bacle at the time of response. It could've been anyone (except Abhorsen, he intimidates me with his brainyness) and I'd of responded in the same manner. I mean seriously I'm pretty sure most of my interactions with Bacle on this forum are the both of us consensually fingerbanging each other with likes or agreeing posts considering 95% of this forum is a basically an ideological circlejerk.

I'm literally blindsided by Bacle's reaction and realizing that my apparently singular interaction with him has had such a profound effect on him to the point he thinks I'm going out of my way to traumatize him. Often I don't know if my braindead spaz posting actually impacts people but it's really touching to know that it has. I will not let this go to waste and unlike my apparent MANY interactions with Bacle before, will not forget.

So how about you Google the shit yourself this time, instead of asking to be spoon fed.

I don't think you understand how discussions like this work. If you make an assertion, it's up to you to provide the evidence, not your adversary in the discussion. But don't worry, others already put the effort forward anyways.

Spoiled or not, they forced the president into his bunker.

I am so fucking tired of hearing this lie.

Trump was place in the bunker by the Secret Service, who have authority over his physical well being, and have full authority to bodily move him if to the bunker if he does not want to go there himself. He would have been forcibly placed in the bunker by his guards regardless of his wishes to remain in the Oval, if he didn't go there under his own power.

So what your saying is that the President wasn't forced into his bunker by Antifa. But that the President was forced into his bunker by the Secret Service because of Antifa.

*mumbles something about lies and goalposts*

Your obviously right in regards to circumstances with context, but unfortunately we live in a world where some people casually ignore the context of posts (Noodles didn't lie or impinge upon Trump's personal bravery), of threads and thread topics *cough* and of even greater situations which much of the media (but not AnimalNoodles) did maliciously smear as being somehow impactful of Trumps personal bravery and/or courage or lack thereof or an inflation.

 

[Cherico]

this is now a direct attack on the federal government, you think that the FBI will finally get off their asses now?