Five minutes of hate news

...isn't LordsFire the evangelical?

At any rate, you've made your opinion on sex assault very clear. You treat it more as a property crime against the male "owners" rather than a crime against the woman's dignity. Hell, you literally started slur shaming rape victims with all the fury of a third world male.

I won't lie. I find your views disgusting and antithetical not only to civilization, but also to God Himself. From now on, I'll be considering you no better than a leftist.
Yes LordsFire is an evangelical that doesen't mean he is right on Christianity or politics. Evangelicals are wrong on many things, and are arrogant about what they are wrong about. One issue is where they do what moderate conservatives do where they are merely the liberals of yesterday. They agree with the enlightenment values and secularism but they think that where we are now, or were 10 years ago was where progress should have stopped. Evangelicals also seem to have a bad faith debate tactic against leftists they will use one set of arguments, yet against Muslims or other highly conservative groups they use a different set basically the liberal set.

Also no rape can be a crime against the woman's dignity. That is primary what it is, it is insulting the woman's honor. It's not a "mere property crime" a property crime would have a fine. Whereas traditionally rape punishments on men were death on average, OR WITH THE VICTIMS PERMISSION forced marriage.

As for your term "slur shaming" I'm sorry that makes you sound like the leftist man. I know you said earlier that you had issues with your father being abusive towards your mother. And I'm sorry about that, but just because some men are shit and not worthy of being the head of the household does not mean that on average on a societal scale that men should not be in charge.
 
... are you retarded or just can't read?
that is not what he said at all.

I am seeing you everywhere lately and you seem to be a typical woke cultist. Completely and utterly deranged and utterly detached from reality.
It is like you have been living under a rock, consuming nothing but MSM.

You twist anything you hear into a woke cultist talking point. In every thread you are participating in. Because that is the only thing you seem to be able to conceive.

Kings arts was talking about the issue of woman who willingly consuming drugs such as alcohol, then have consensual sex while slightly inebriated (with a man who consumed just as much if not more alcohol than them), then throwing out bullshit rape allegations is NOT the same as saying "rape is a property crime against their male owners".
Those are two completely different arguments. The latter one being you putting words into people's mouths
Yes thank you. Now maybe this woman was raped, or maybe she was not. We don't know for certain so I won't speculate. But the fact that there was a change in the story makes me not want to convict the man.

Also refusing the slut shame is actually insulting the women who get raped through no fault of their own.
Stuff like this, it's cut and dry we can see that this woman was forced against her will.

Now compare to this woman who was being a whore who agreed to have intimate relations with 12 innocent Jewish men and then when she found out they recorded her and she would be seen as a whore tried to shut that down by crying rape.

This second woman is not worthy of much sympathy, she was not raped she fully was ok with the intimate acts.
 
I read it better than you did. And considering he was calling the evangelical a wokie and you seem to be agreeing with him, I refuse to humor your accusations.
It’s less wokeism and more than I find that low church Christian’s are wrong about everything and they are more about the culture war than about the faith. For instance I disagree with Catholics and the high church Protestants. But I can see where they are coming from for instance. I’m talking about conservative high church Protestants like redeemed zoomer on YouTube.
 
...isn't LordsFire the evangelical?

At any rate, you've made your opinion on sex assault very clear. You treat it more as a property crime against the male "owners" rather than a crime against the woman's dignity. Hell, you literally started slur shaming rape victims with all the fury of a third world male.

I won't lie. I find your views disgusting and antithetical not only to civilization, but also to God Himself. From now on, I'll be considering you no better than a leftist.
Look I think rape should carry the death penalty, but slut shaming is a good thing and we should go back to it being the norm.
 
Look I think rape should carry the death penalty, but slut shaming is a good thing and we should go back to it being the norm.
Disagree on both, but especially the first given the proclivity of false accusations and how they can already ruin someone's life, even if they are later vindicated.
 
@DarthOne PS : I didn't exactly made the best impression when we met since my previous two exes where from her country and I spent like 40 minutes talking about those two previous ladies and how I gave everyone advice how and why they shouldn't date ladies from that country.

Needless to say, I didn't manage to follow my own advice for more than 30 minutes.

meme-face-palm.gif



My friends reaction :

peach-goma-peach-and-goma.gif


Her friends after I spent 30 minutes trash-talking them for being from that country and their country :

giphy.gif
 
Well, at least you got that.
Reminds me of something that I saw in my Twitter feed months ago, apparently the guy was a famous because of his pov movies (whatever it means not exactly keen to find out), hacker gets old of his videos and starts either blackmailing and/or sending his "work" to family and friends.

EDIT :

I think it is guy :


Don't know what happened afterwards, but I can guess to a degree it applies to men the shaming.
 
Reminds me of something that I saw in my Twitter feed months ago, apparently the guy was a famous because of his pov movies (whatever it means not exactly keen to find out), hacker gets old of his videos and starts either blackmailing and/or sending his "work" to family and friends.

EDIT :

I think it is guy :


Don't know what happened afterwards, but I can guess to a degree it applies to men the shaming.
POV means Point of View. He either held the camera himself or wore something like a GoPro when he had sex with these porn stars. The fact someone hacked him and blackmailed him is horrible.
 
@DarthOne PS : I didn't exactly made the best impression when we met since my previous two exes where from her country and I spent like 40 minutes talking about those two previous ladies and how I gave everyone advice how and why they shouldn't date ladies from that country.

Needless to say, I didn't manage to follow my own advice for more than 30 minutes.

meme-face-palm.gif



My friends reaction :

peach-goma-peach-and-goma.gif


Her friends after I spent 30 minutes trash-talking them for being from that country and their country :

giphy.gif
What country?
 
What country?
One that gives tons of joke material because some its citizens being patriotic about their country while not living in it, it is a pain in the ass to their neighbours and denies (and gets away it) like at least three genocides it committed while being headed by a guy whose family not even from the country.

On a more cheerful note, the lass was the embodiment of 1 Corinthians 13:4-7.
 
POV means Point of View. He either held the camera himself or wore something like a GoPro when he had sex with these porn stars. The fact someone hacked him and blackmailed him is horrible.
I don't wish anyone that, though that is a possibility of the job wheter we like or not.
I wouldn't be surprised many male amateurs try to do the same in the "field".
 
Anyway, speaking of people who don't believe in just not watching something if they don't like/approve of it:


Oh, how dare you try to keep the government from monitoring Americans online and censoring them. "Free speech is not absolute."
 
Anyway, speaking of people who don't believe in just not watching something if they don't like/approve of it:


Oh, how dare you try to keep the government from monitoring Americans online and censoring them. "Free speech is not absolute."

Easy solution, people who don't believe the first amendment is absolute, loses first amendment rights and therefore can be censored/imprisoned/etc for anything they say.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top