‘Sadly accurate’.
So I found this while going through Twitter and it got me thinking, while I myself don't really have the capacity to articulate a conversation starter, I thought it would still be interesting to talk about.
So, when you look at these four panels, what is your first reaction when you reach the end?
So I found this while going through Twitter and it got me thinking, while I myself don't really have the capacity to articulate a conversation starter, I thought it would still be interesting to talk about.
So, when you look at these four panels, what is your first reaction when you reach the end?
Interestingly enough I have seen women argue along those lines that children are just bad because "noise, disgusting habits and annoying behaviour" they would then go on to say they got pets because they're just "simply better" yet still admit that pets come with the same problems as a young child. Seems like a denial of responsibility than anything.
Though the panel is less kids to no kids at all.
It's sad knowing that women have biological clock. We cannot turn back the time or go back in the past.
So I found this while going through Twitter and it got me thinking, while I myself don't really have the capacity to articulate a conversation starter, I thought it would still be interesting to talk about.
So, when you look at these four panels, what is your first reaction when you reach the end?
I too advocate for this. I have stated before that best way to deal with low birth rate imo is cut out women from the equation entirely. But the question is will we have the will to use said tech. With how moralizing to the point of suicide society is becoming. We may have situation where we have the tech but no will to do anything cause social justice or some bullshit like that.
How so?
Maybe yes, maybe no. Remember that we are dealing with self-hating leftists who now rule. People who want to extinct the male sex to replacing the native population of their own countries to wanting human extinction.
Indeed. Exactly this.
Yeah. I know. That's what's happening these days. However, what you are saying is just another option. Not really the soluton.
Well, not really. Artificial wombs would drastically lower the cost of pregnancy to wealthy people who can afford it. For example, Kim Kardashian has had multiple kids through surrogacy, but if surrogacy was banned, I doubt she would have any. Artificial wombs would make this much more viable less well off couples.
Of course it will be difficult. I'm sure its well known that raising kids is difficult hence why the virtues that are spouted about not having kids is no responsibility and no stress that come from raising kids.
Then do you have a suggestion? The problem is of course women. Society is gynocentric. Women simply either don't want to have kids or have few kids. Its all their decision.