And an additional one for the day...
wac.colostate.edu
For the first page, the teacher actually makes some pretty good points about how the value of teacher grading is overweighed and that a lot of grading standards are essentially arbitrary.
Their thought process then rapidly degrades in both intelligence and quality as they hyperfixate on how all of educations problems are actually due to white supremacy.
Also, I think the quote
in context makes sense. I don't agree entirely with his
conclusions, but I understand the why of what he's saying.
I think its a case of a broken clock is right twice a day. They seem to be able to acknowledge and understand that there are some real problems with
how grading works in classrooms, but bad philosophies prevent them from understanding the actual
why's.
Edit: Also, looking at his grading rubric for students that he actually gives after his huge book...
Its nothing special.
Its just a bog standard participation grading system, which is
already how most introductory writing systems essentially work. You're required to change things in response to instructor feedback, for example. He's not going to force you to change it in a specific way, but the idea of trying to correct a students bad writing habits is still there.
And reading it, and how standard it is, just makes me feel like he wrote a 200 page book on wokeness for wokeness's sake.