...She even plagiarized her fucking "I quit!" letter? Either she's doing it to troll, knowing she's rumbled, or she's really fucking stupid and lazy.
Probably just grabbed a boiler plate resignation letter and replaced the necessary spotsm...She even plagiarized her fucking "I quit!" letter? Either she's doing it to troll, knowing she's rumbled, or she's really fucking stupid and lazy.
Someone seems a little saltyOf course, plagiarism these days can get very technical and *very* annoying if you have a professor who wants to get hyper nitpicky about things. You write your paper, cite all of the sources you actually use, and do as comprehensive of a literature review as you can to try to find any obscure source somewhere that might possibly use similar language to what you just wrote after the fact, go to submit the paper, and it turns out that a paper submitted to an obscure boutique journal on a topic with no actual relevance or relationship to your own that has literally never been cited by anybody else just so happens to have an identical phrase in it about something completely unrelated to what you used said phrase for and you are defending yourself against plagiarism charges.
Paper topic - The Battle of Cherbourg between USS Kearsarge and CSS Alabama during the US Civil War with a focus on the respective commanders, their previous careers, their writings, and how their backgrounds influenced the events of the battle.
The paper that had the 'plagiarized' content - was published in a vanity boutique pay-to-publish journal on women's studies and is about power relationships in lesbian erotic performance art. The offending phrase? "In the French port of Cherbourg in 1865..."
That's considered plagiarism by US standards? At best for that single phrase I could do is this. "In France's port of Cherbourg in 1865".Of course, plagiarism these days can get very technical and *very* annoying if you have a professor who wants to get hyper nitpicky about things. You write your paper, cite all of the sources you actually use, and do as comprehensive of a literature review as you can to try to find any obscure source somewhere that might possibly use similar language to what you just wrote after the fact, go to submit the paper, and it turns out that a paper submitted to an obscure boutique journal on a topic with no actual relevance or relationship to your own that has literally never been cited by anybody else just so happens to have an identical phrase in it about something completely unrelated to what you used said phrase for and you are defending yourself against plagiarism charges.
Paper topic - The Battle of Cherbourg between USS Kearsarge and CSS Alabama during the US Civil War with a focus on the respective commanders, their previous careers, their writings, and how their backgrounds influenced the events of the battle.
The paper that had the 'plagiarized' content - was published in a vanity boutique pay-to-publish journal on women's studies and is about power relationships in lesbian erotic performance art. The offending phrase? "In the French port of Cherbourg in 1865..."
No, it's more like, that'll cause the tools they use to detect plagiarism to flag the work as plagiarism.That's considered plagiarism by US standards? At best for that single phrase I could do is this. "In France's port of Cherbourg in 1865".
Sometimes is more than good because it does give answers I would never thought about...though using for an entire new paper would be risky for anyone.It's gotten even worse with ChatGPT being considered the world's current wunderwaffen. sigh
Sometimes is more than good because it does give answers I would never thought about...though using for an entire new paper would be risky for anyone.
Memes by the way.
Sometimes is more than good because it does give answers I would never thought about...though using for an entire new paper would be risky for anyone.
Memes by the way.
This had lead to a severe wake up call of some, such as Bill Ackman. He's not just against the antisemitism in Harvard, but it has broadened into full blown hatred at the racism of DEI, including against white people. The truth is winning.