Interesting Military Facts & Stories You Discovered

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
I was actually wondering about this one...



All about the elongated head coverings some Israeli soldiers sport on their helmets, apparently known as a Mitznefet. I figured it was some random cultural head covering or the like. But no.
 

Buba

A total creep
Wouldn't normal camo covering do that, or you need something bit more separate from the helmet itself?
2in1?
Both sunbonnet and breaking the regular outline of the helmet, with less fuss and local flavour?
When helmet not needed, you pull the dashy baggy cap off it in and plop on your head, with no need for any sort of outdress cap etc.?
Separation of cloth and helmet may indeed be beneficial.
AFAIK one or two board members did service in the IDF - maybe they will know more.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
IMO you are missing the obvious - the rag keeps the Sun from heating up your helmet.

Yeah I've been seeing some adorable pictures of the floppy helmet covering being used as shade by the Zionist Stormtroopers, especially their Amazon Warriors. It's pretty clear it has more utility than just disruptive patterning. Plus of course, it hides their horns more effectively.

I don't have horns but I still kinda wanna buy one now.

Have to pair it with a helmet though.
 

Buba

A total creep
Zionist Stormtroopers, especially their Amazon Warriors. It's pretty clear it has more utility than just disruptive patterning. Plus of course, it hides their horns more effectively.
Hmmm ... aren't you confusing the Demoness and Vampiressa Brigades? The former is quite heat proof, thank you very much. No need for shade in their case. It are the palid but deadly warriors of the latter who are TEEHEE sun shy TEEHEE ... using military grade SPF 150 sunlotion by the barrel TEEHEE ...
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Saw this on Social Media in shorter clips so I looked for the longer videos on YouTube.

It's all from the early days of the Syrian Civil War, before some Rebel Groups advanced further down the tech tree.

Old Cannon.



Trebuchets.





Some of it was likely widely seen before but... always nice to revisit the classics, or introduce them to new people. :p
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Makes me realize how lucky the US is that most if not all of our war footage is free
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The theorized kill ratio of US Bombers versus Axis Fighters in air to air combat.



And yes, like everyone else, Gunners likely overstated their kills. :p
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade


Why the T-34 is crap.

Not the best video, he just kinda rambles a bit too much without explaining/providing sources.
He also somehow thinks the T-14 Armata is powered by the same engines that powered the Porsche Tiger.

Ya know. This thing.
zwxf4cto01t51.jpg
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
His T 34 is a good one though and his T 14 was a horrible video he even made a bad comment about.
He definitely had a good point in some of his videos ans can make stories interesting.
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade
His T 34 is a good one though and his T 14 was a horrible video he even made a bad comment about.
He definitely had a good point in some of his videos ans can make stories interesting.
It's misleading because many of the T-34's shortcomings were the result of expedience and desperation. The Americans studied an example and found it to be inferior to the Sherman for a bunch of reasons, but otherwise a serviceable tank.

Were Wartime (and even postwar examples) complete trash, barely fit for animals let alone people? Sure. But the quality of finish hardly relates to what the design specs were.

Eventually most of the design's problems were worked out, but even the Sherman had a rough development period to get to the excellent M4A3(w) 76 E8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
It's misleading because many of the T-34's shortcomings were the result of expedience and desperation. The Americans studied an example and found it to be inferior to the Sherman for a bunch of reasons, but otherwise a serviceable tank.

Were Wartime (and even postwar examples) complete trash, barely fit for animals let alone people? Sure. But the quality of finish hardly relates to what the design specs were.

Eventually most of the design's problems were worked out, but even the Sherman had a rough development period to get to the excellent M4A3(w) 76 E8.
The T 34 was horrible until the 85 and was still horrible.
Sherman's were great at thier job.
It wasn't till it was facing tigers and panthers, which was very late war, that they needed an upgrade and even then the Sherman 75 was still the most common tank and did the job it needed too.

And the thing about T 34s that made them okay was the quick building capability of Soviet factories.
When they could they built more then them and better. IS series. T44... SU series.
All better then the T 34.

The thing about the Sherman was it was always a good tank.
It was the best all around tank of the war, and every country on the allies had one.
We can see in Korea just how diffrent they were for the crews and they were better made T 34s then as well
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade
The T 34 was horrible until the 85 and was still horrible.
Sure could've fooled the Germans who requested a damned copy of the T-34 for their usage.

Could the soviets have made a better tank with what they had? Of course.
But same goes for every damned nation in WW2.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top