Proxy 404
Well-known member
well as I understand it's, Madow was commenting on facts that the court verified, OAN does employ someone who does also work for the Russian government.she can have opinions and comment about that, Tucker has been ruled to says things on air no reasonable person can be expect to take as trueSo, when Fox says "hey, this isn't supposed to be 100% truth, it's just Tucker's opinion and not meant to be taken as literal truth", that's a lame defense of speaking false information for profit that shouldn't have worked.
When MSNBC says the exact same thing in defense, then they should win because it's a bogus SLAPP suit.
Care to explain how that's not a double standard based on nothing more than partisanship?
Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News
The “general tenor” of Carlson’s show is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses, the judge wrote.
slate.com
Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News