No. See, the thing is, we don't think this absolves the corporations, something you'd know if you at all listened to libertarians. We just think it's hilarious that you believe empowering the government depowers the corporations that control the government. But you don't, so you like inventing problems they have because you don't notice actual problems.
This is especially sad in a discussion about one of the classic libertarian problems: how do you get defense without the state? There was such an easy problem to point out, but you couldn't do that. You instead went with the old hack of 'Corporations bad, we need government to stop them' stupidity.
It's a pathetic argument, so bad that I just handed you a better argument.
Literally Spain. I'm not even Christian and I know this.
I have spoke and argued with plenty of lolberterians.
You are not speaking for all lolberterians.
You are engaging in cognative dissonence. You claim that you are not absolving the corporations. Yet at the same time argue that all corporate evil comes from govt and only the govt and if only we dissolved the govt corporations will be good.
You personally suffer from a "defund the police" type mental disorder when it comes to anti trust legislation.
Thinking that disassembling the govt is the magic bullet that will fix corruption. while using the govt to breakup monopolies never works (please ignore all the times in history where it worked)
You fix corruption by arresting and depowering corrupt individuals. Which is a neverending war.
You don't fix corruption by saying "its a jungle now. please enjoy having no laws at all"
Also, you are making strawman here. You don't need to "give govt more power" in order to stop evil corporations.
Just use the existing anti trust laws that have been left unused for a while. enforce those to break up monopolies.
And while we are it, ban intellectual property.