Arlos
Sad Monarchist
No go zone are definitely a thing, nobody deny it, even the furthest left people in our political spectrum(they just cheer on them when they attack police)Yeah. Unfortunately, Reason at this point is not a particularly reliable source for anything these days. Getting any sort of reliable info I think is difficult, since there really is no truly neutral info and everything is super spin at this point. For example, all the information I could find on these kinds of issues all dated back to 2016, with newer info being hard to find.
However, looking on the wiki on the subject, something like 16% of French muslims were willing to admit to regular support of suicide bombing, and about 35% put as at some point justifiable. The no go zones do seem to, in fact, exist. There were about 10,000 people on the French Fiche S, a sort of watch list, suspected of being Islamic radicals who were a risk to national security in 2005, and I've heard in a podcast that its risen to some 50,000 now.
If they're right about things spiraling to civil war, dismissing the "low level" violence at this stage is like looking at bleeding Kansas, saying that only some 200 ish people have died, and thus declaring fears of a civil war in the 1860s is overblown. Or, for a more recent example, looking at Antifia and seeing only some 10-20 dead and thus declaring nothing of much significant happened with the setting up of Chad and other "no go" zones.
Such anaysis misses the forest for the trees, often deliberately.
I do believe those numbers on terrorist went up, it’s also important to not that it’s only those who admit it, fact is, there is little to no condamnation from the Muslim community when a terrorists attack happen.