I think we can both agree the system needed a shake up then.No, he was talking about a Speaker losing the first vote, not the general political brew up happening; that vote loss had not happened in 100 years
I think we can both agree the system needed a shake up then.No, he was talking about a Speaker losing the first vote, not the general political brew up happening; that vote loss had not happened in 100 years
No, he was talking about a Speaker losing the first vote, not the general political brew up happening; that vote loss had not happened in 100 years
I think we can both agree the system needed a shake up then.
In general, all the politicking is done before and the actual vote is a formality. Actually fighting it out in the votes is, yeah, hasn't happened in an age.
It's not that the position isn't fought over, it's that in the name of making a display of party unity, the fighting is generally done *before* the actual vote.
Very believable of him.I saw a news thing saying Mccarthy was potentially going to cave to almost all of the demands if they vote for him.
Because a lot of people on the Right still have this brainbug that the US budget operates like a household budget, when that has never been the case, and think that money going to help Ukraine win and reclaim it's territory is better spent here.I still don't understand why they are having the Ukraine thing be as big of an issue.
It allows US companies to make more things to make more money and that in turn helps us.
The ones that want the military to lose funding are the same that think being isolated is still viableBecause a lot of people on the Right still have this brainbug that the US budget operates like a household budget, when that has never been the case, and think that money going to help Ukraine win and reclaim it's territory is better spent here.
Plus, some of the Right still buy that 'trad con Russia' bullshit (ignoring the AIDS epidemic and gay punishment sex in RU military), or think that Russia will go nuclear before they allow themselves to be pushed out of Ukraine.
And more than a few do not want military stuff funded at all, regardless of what is happening outside the country.
Much of the Right has no ability to adapt, or admit when they were wrong, and would rather double down on stupid ideological naivety and stubbornness most of the time.
The Dems have their blind spots, but so do the Right, and at this moment the Right's blind spots are more embarrassing and damaging to their causes than the Dems are for their causes.
They do not want to learn anything that could change that, and are more driven by ideology and naivety than practicality and realities on the ground.The ones that want the military to lose funding are the same that think being isolated is still viable
This is a brief digression, but I think it relates because a portion of these 20-21 Republicans motivation for opposition seemingly stems from it.I still don't understand why they are having the Ukraine thing be as big of an issue.
It allows US companies to make more things to make more money and that in turn helps us.
The ones that want the military to lose funding are the same that think being isolated is still viable
The bigger issue isn't the Ukraine funding per se. It's that the Lame Ducks are the ones who passed it rather than waiting until the new year so the new Republican majority could have a chance to negotiate and set the tone for things. The Ukraine funding just happens to be one of the big targets because the Senate went on and BRAGGED about how they'd secured more funding for Ukraine and called it "the number one priority of most Republicans".They do not want to learn anything that could change that, and are more driven by ideology and naivety than practicality and realities on the ground.
Ideologues are the ones who usually are the last to admit when they are/were wrong, because it means admitting realities on the ground matter more than any ideological desires or dictates.
he linked what peoples priorities are in that link to pew research. Ukraine isn't top 5 for republicans or democrats. foreign policy in general rates as 12th concern overall.What else would they fund? Honestly question
Building nuclear power plants... funding to build domestic oil production a refinement... funding to expand the railroad system and supply chain... funding to support farms and reduce the cost of groceries.What else would they fund? Honestly question
The bigger issue isn't the Ukraine funding per se. It's that the Lame Ducks are the ones who passed it rather than waiting until the new year so the new Republican majority could have a chance to negotiate and set the tone for things. The Ukraine funding just happens to be one of the big targets because the Senate went on and BRAGGED about how they'd secured more funding for Ukraine and called it "the number one priority of most Republicans".
Look, I'm not against funding Ukraine, but saying it's "the number one priority of most Republicans" is so out of touch with what people actually want its kinda hilarious. There's a laundry list of domestic things needing attention BEFORE funding Ukraine. But it was funding for Ukraine that was highlighted as a priority by McConnel in the Senate, hence why it's receiving so much fire from those on the right, understandably so.
It's receiving fire from those fools who still think Russia/Putin can be negotiated with, or who just want to abandon Ukraine as whole, or those who still do not get that Ukraine's defense is not an optional issue and can't be kicked down the road to the next Congressional session.Building nuclear power plants... funding to build domestic oil production a refinement... funding to expand the railroad system and supply chain... funding to support farms and reduce the cost of groceries.
Instead the bill that was passed was laden down with Dem special interest funding and completely undercut the incoming House's ability to negotiate.
He should have quit after the 3rd go aroundthen pass the aid as a separate bill and don't torpedo the negotiating power of the house for 9 out of 24 months they will have power. it would have gotten some frowns still but it would have been a more acceptable bill.
Edit: and he loses a seventh time! one more and he gets the record.