To clarify on my views of egalitarianism, my view is pretty much what
@ShieldWife has stated. With regards with the kind of egalitarianism porn promotes,
this was the link (from the first page, no less).
The egalitarian views I attack as "destructive" are "egalitarian attitudes towards women," otherwise known as gender egalitarianism. This elaborated in studies like
this one, which states:
Pornography users held more egalitarian attitudes—toward women in positions of power, toward women working outside the home, and toward abortion—than nonusers of pornography. Further, pornography users and pornography nonusers did not differ significantly in their attitudes toward the traditional family and in their self-identification as feminist. The results of this study suggest that pornography use may not be associated with gender nonegalitarian attitudes in a manner that is consistent with radical feminist theory.
This, in combination with the other studies I linked demonstrating that pornography is responsible for causing people to lose their religious beliefs, the E. Michael Jones theory of "sexual liberation as political control" (that is, porn use makes one more docile), and the traditional link by non-egalitarian thinkers like Plato between egalitarian politics and animal passions seems to suggest that the positive correlation between porn use and gender egalitarianism is causal in nature. If you hold a traditional, gender complementarian position like myself or
@Captain-General, you should oppose pornography use.
Traditional gender complementarianism holds that women and men have differing physical and psychological characteristics that make them better suited for certain tasks. Those with this view hold that the push for women to enter traditionally male-dominated fields in modern times is, on the whole, destructive because it leads them to neglect their traditional roles as guardians of the hearth. If nobody is raising the kids, who is? I should also refer you to
the copious evidence showing that women out-earning men leads to a decline in marriage rates. This makes a certain amount of sense: traditionally, marriage was a sort of division of labor, where the woman (who had less economic opportunities) would concentrate her efforts on what she could do at home while men concentrated their efforts on what they could do outside of the home. What's the point of marriage if you out-earn any potential suitor? And the push for more women in STEM fields and other male-dominated fields is also well-known to any critic of modern feminism.
I hope I've made my point clear enough.