"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists


tl;dr: A femnazi began dating an actual bloke and not a soyboy/beta. She quickly has become non-feminist despite her claims. He basically fucked/exorcised the feminist demon from her, lol.

One of the many reasons cults are so desperate to keep their members isolated and ignorant. Because if they didn't, they might come to realize from experience that all the lies used to control them are just that; lies.
 
...these women actually exist? I thought they were a joke!
Lol...try dating in America in 2024.

Women of the current generations have been raised to believe that any sort of traditional role is bad. The outcome is that any sort of caretaking of the home is bad. Taking care of your man in any way is bad.

I've been on so many dates and quickly realized why these women are single.

I don't even want someone to do everything around the house. But maybe someone who doesn't mind whipping up a quick dinner or throwing my stuff in the laundry once I a while because I'm pulling 10-12 hour days that week.

But you'll see comments sections around the internet that really do reflect IRL personalities. For example, I saw one yesterday where a woman was a stay at home mom. Her husband was upset that he'd come home to a dirty house and she never did laundry or cooked dinner. She was also complaining that husband gets the "fun time" with three kid because the kid is so happy when he comes home and shit. She's the one who has to do all the work all day! (Meanwhile he's out working 12 hour shifts)

The men in that thread were saying "he's at work 12 hours a day. You are at home. Your job is to take care of the home." To which, 99% of females responded about how taking care of the kid is her full time job, and how she doesn't need to cook and clean, and how the husband needs to pitch in around the house. He wants a mom replacement, leave that whole man, he can go back to mom if he wants someone to take care of him.

Which in this dynamic, is utterly ridiculous. It's also the prevailing personality amongst millennial women. Women want all the traditional perks of being a woman, but none of the traditional responsibilities.

In short, she wants to watch Netflix all day, change the occasional diaper, and microwave chicken nuggies for lunch while he works his ass off every day. And then have him come home to do all the house work, too.

And people wonder why "men going their own way" is a movement. Most modern women are fat, disgusting, lazy, filthy entitled trash.

This is my take from dating a lot over the last few years. This isn't an opinion formed just from sitting on the internet. This is from going out with and meeting them lol.
 
Last edited:
Yep.

Western women are pretty much that, which is why blokes are becoming "passport bros" to Eastern Europe, Asia, and South America. Feminism isn't such a cancer there.

It's also driving Western women utterly mad because they're basically being benched for being such unlikeable cunts. :ROFLMAO:

The Danish parliament actually ran an ad campaign to try to get the native Danes to marry and knock up native women, and it failed. And Sweden? The women up there, masculinized women and not the stereotypical "Swedish babe", actually demanded their government "limit" the amount of Thai women the native Swedish men are marrying.

They know the writing is on the wall for them since men are either going abroad or checking out completely.

"What do you bring to the table, except for three kids from three different fathers or being a "Boss Babe"?"

"I am the table because I have tits and ass and a semi-pretty face."

"You mean a table from Ikea, right? Pass."
 
I will, once again, point out that there are still women of character out there.

They have a strong tendency to get into stable relationships and get married pretty quick though, because they can see through some or all of the feminist bullshit, and don't have trouble attracting a man.
Yeah. That's where the problems with dating in your 30s comes from.

The good ones are mostly taken.

Which I suppose is one more reason the right wing traditionalist types were right, when I was young and manwhoring around that maybe I should find a good girl settle down and start a family.

But I never did find a good girl...to be fair the party lifestyle I lead wasn't conducive to such an outcome though.
 
Yeah. That's where the problems with dating in your 30s comes from.

The good ones are mostly taken.

Which I suppose is one more reason the right wing traditionalist types were right, when I was young and manwhoring around that maybe I should find a good girl settle down and start a family.

But I never did find a good girl...to be fair the party lifestyle I lead wasn't conducive to such an outcome though.
The good thing about being a man, is that you don’t have to date within your age grouping.

Date 5 to 10 years younger. Better to end up with a good, younger woman than a bitter, older one.
 
The good thing about being a man, is that you don’t have to date within your age grouping.

Date 5 to 10 years younger. Better to end up with a good, younger woman than a bitter, older one.

Which is another thing that drives the typical modern western (femminist) woman mad. They usually start screeching about ‘power dynamics’. And while they might have a leg to stand on in some extreme cases, 90+ of the time it just shows how out of touch they are in the reality of how spoiled western women are treated by law and society.
 
Which is another thing that drives the typical modern western (femminist) woman mad. They usually start screeching about ‘power dynamics’. And while they might have a leg to stand on in some extreme cases, 90+ of the time it just shows how out of touch they are in the reality of how spoiled western women are treated by law and society.

You'll notice they only ever have a problem with older men dating younger women.

When a cougar grabs a young man however it's nothing but praise and encouragement.

This is just another of the many examples of why feminism is a sexist ideology.
 
Last edited:
I will, once again, point out that there are still women of character out there.

They have a strong tendency to get into stable relationships and get married pretty quick though, because they can see through some or all of the feminist bullshit, and don't have trouble attracting a man.
> Just win the lottery bro

Yea, good women exist. But they are less than 1% of the population

and the problem is, modern society is wrong on so many fronts. that even if the woman is good for some things, she might be bad on others.
 
> Just win the lottery bro

Yea, good women exist. But they are less than 1% of the population

and the problem is, modern society is wrong on so many fronts. that even if the woman is good for some things, she might be bad on others.

The current situation is utterly out of wack with historical norms, this modern era is fucking weird I mean truely strange, toxic and cultish. It will end, because its utterly unsustainable and led by an elite who is creating chaos for shits and giggles. It persists for now because the west is raiding all of the stored up value created over the centuries once its played out it ends.
 
> Just win the lottery bro

Yea, good women exist. But they are less than 1% of the population

and the problem is, modern society is wrong on so many fronts. that even if the woman is good for some things, she might be bad on others.
'The lottery.'

'Less than 1% of the population.'

Tell me, what's the divorce rate?

Because I'm pretty sure it's a lot lower than 99%.
 
'The lottery.'

'Less than 1% of the population.'
You are right that 1% is way too high, I was being generous because I didn't want to quibble about number of zeroes. which is why I said "less than 1%" instead of "exactly 1 in 100,000" or something to that extent.
Tell me, what's the divorce rate?
divorce rate != rate of bad women.

1. many women won't even get married in the first place so they cannot divorce.
2. men will put up with a bad woman for the sake of the kids
3. divorce rate does not differentiate between passport bros and those who marry western women
 
You are right that 1% is way too high, I was being generous because I didn't want to quibble about number of zeroes. which is why I said "less than 1%" instead of "exactly 1 in 100,000" or something to that extent.

divorce rate != rate of bad women.

1. many women won't even get married in the first place so they cannot divorce.
2. men will put up with a bad woman for the sake of the kids
3. divorce rate does not differentiate between passport bros and those who marry western women
My point is that claiming that less than 1% of western women are 'good women' is utterly ridiculous.

'Passport bros' are not a significant portion of the population. The best number a quick search could get me was about 7.4% of the marriages are one American-born, one foreign-born, and this number does not indicate whether it's a man or woman, or whether the foreign-born is someone who came to America, rather than the American going out and finding someone elsewhere in the world.

No marriage is perfect, but the idea that the overwhelming majority of marriages only stay together because the man is putting up with terrible women for the sake of the kids or something similar is ridiculous on the face of it.

There are somewhere over 50 million married couples in the US, it was ~55 million ten years ago, I'm not going to spend forever hunting statistics to get the most recent and accurate figure. About half of first marriages end in divorce, people who get divorce and remarry are more likely to get divorced again.

US population is currently about 335 million, so there's about 168 million women. Of that, about a quarter are going to be considered too young to get married by standards of the day, so that leaves us about 126 million. Of those 126 million, over 50 million are married, so for meaningful statistics, about 40% of those are married.

If we take very pessimistic assumptions, and assume that all divorces are the woman's fault, that gets us to 20% of the population of 'potentially good women' left. If we then assume that three quarters of those women who are sane and stable enough for a guy to stay married to are actually still 'bad women,' then we are still left with 5% of women as 'good women.'

This is assuming that all women who are widows are bad women. This is assuming that all women too young to get married count as 'bad women.' This is assuming that all women who deliberately choose to be single are 'bad women.'

All of these are impossibly pessimistic assumptions that cannot at all be said to be in reasonable contact with reality, but even with all of these negative assumptions, we still end up with integer multiples more 'good women' than your absurd black-pilled number.


Because that's what your number is. Black-pilled, defeatist, justification to kvetch online, and give up on actually getting somewhere meaningful with this part of life.

I started dating in my teens. I didn't manage to get married until I was 36. I'm quite familiar with how hard it can be to find a good woman to get married to (my wife was repeatedly telling me yesterday how blessed she is to have me), I know it's hard.

But it isn't futile, and telling lies that it's even worse than it actually is doesn't help anything or anybody.
 
My point is that claiming that less than 1% of western women are 'good women' is utterly ridiculous.

No marriage is perfect, but the idea that the overwhelming majority of marriages only stay together because the man is putting up with terrible women for the sake of the kids or something similar is ridiculous on the face of it.
Ah, so it is wishful thinking and cope.
All of these are impossibly pessimistic assumptions that cannot at all be said to be in reasonable contact with reality, but even with all of these negative assumptions, we still end up with integer multiples more 'good women' than your absurd black-pilled number.
They are not assumptions. they are observations. Observations that an increasingly large number of men share. hence MGTOW
 
Ah, so it is wishful thinking and cope.

They are not assumptions. they are observations. Observations that an increasingly large number of men share. hence MGTOW
An 'observation' is 'there are a lot of messed up and/or crazy women out there.'

'99% of all women are too crazy/messed up to be worth having a relationship' is not an observation, it is a cynical assertion completely lacking in substantiation.
 
An 'observation' is 'there are a lot of messed up and/or crazy women out there.'

'99% of all women are too crazy/messed up to be worth having a relationship' is not an observation, it is a cynical assertion completely lacking in substantiation.
No, it is pure facts.
You are simply denying reality on the basis of... nothing at all really. just because.
 
No, it is pure facts.
You are simply denying reality on the basis of... nothing at all really. just because.
It's facts?

Okay, substantiate it.

Show me some shred of proof that less than 1 in 100 women are worth having a relationship.

Because so far the one who's denying reality on the basis of nothing at all, just because, is you.
 
It's facts?

Okay, substantiate it.

Show me some shred of proof that less than 1 in 100 women are worth having a relationship.

Because so far the one who's denying reality on the basis of nothing at all, just because, is you.
The actual 99% thing is just hyperbole from that poster, I'm sure. However anecdotally, I can say that the vast majority of single women in their 30s are just plain awful.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top