"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

[KilroywasNOTHere]

Thuggery: The violent act of thugs.

Thugs:

1. a violent, aggressive person, especially one who is a criminal.
   "he was attacked by a gang of thugs"
2. 
   HISTORICAL
   a member of a group or organization of robbers and assassins in India who waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, and stole their belongings. They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.

This basically confirms to me that A. Modernity is everything after whatever ones personal golden time period is and B. Words don't mean anything to people.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

To quote Adrian Plass: Civilization is a mutual agreement to all pretend that we are not savages.

Modernity tends to forget that.

Oh I disagree modernity loves to pretend it's not a savage. Frankly I'm tired of the pretending. At least the thug is honest with his savagery. Nobody accuses me of being a ist phobe or an apostate when I shoots the thug to protect what's mine and those I care about.

Shoot the clergy the kingsman or the aristocrats for doing the same thing and you are a heathen savage that must be put down for the greater good.

I'm at the point where I'd rather take my chances with the beast and the elements. At least they don't decive, they don't philosophize and they don't justify.

Unfortunately true wilderness is non existent nowadays.

 

[Aldarion]

Modernity...creates...thuggery....dude the Germanic, greeks, Mongols, pirates, ninavites sodomites, and neanderthals, freaking Cain would ALL like to know your location. Rape murder and pillaging has been how humanity has spread for the majority of its existence.

And all of them had at least some sort of agreement to limit or eliminate thuggery within the group, and oftentimes thuggery between the groups as well. In fact, civilization exists in the first place in order to control base instincts of human nature.

Modern people, especially "progressives" and similar types, tend to forget that and pretend that civilizational norms and traditions built up over thousands of years can be simply uprooted and discarded with no consequence.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

And all of them had at least some sort of agreement to limit or eliminate thuggery within the group, and oftentimes thuggery between the groups as well. In fact, civilization exists in the first place in order to control base instincts of human nature.

Modern people, especially "progressives" and similar types, tend to forget that and pretend that civilizational norms and traditions built up over thousands of years can be simply uprooted and discarded with no consequence.

more like monopolize it.

 

[Scottty]

Oh I disagree modernity loves to pretend it's not a savage. Frankly I'm tired of the pretending. At least the thug is honest with his savagery.

Lol no, no, they were not. If you were part of a group of people traveling between towns in India, the thugs would join your party and pretend to be civilized - right up to the point where the group stopped for the night somewhere, and they would strangle you in your sleep or cut your throat, while chanting devotions to their evil gods.

Happily, the big jackboot of British Colonial Oppression took a look at this, decided "oh I say, that's not on!" and came down on the entire Thuggee religion good and hard, to the point where that sect of Hinduism has now been eradicated.
And good riddance.

That aside, I get your point.

Nobody accuses me of being a ist phobe or an apostate when I shoots the thug to protect what's mine and those I care about.

In a saner world that would be true.

Shoot the clergy the kingsman or the aristocrats for doing the same thing and you are a heathen savage that must be put down for the greater good.

It still happened more than they would admit.

I'm at the point where I'd rather take my chances with the beast and the elements. At least they don't decive, they don't philosophize and they don't justify.
Unfortunately true wilderness is non existent nowadays.

Well, getting a bit harder to find, certainly.

 

[IndyFront]

This is heartbreaking. This shit is why I don't feel comfortable presenting as outwardly cis male. When you are part of a demographic that is perceived as inherently violent and evil people will go out of their way to target you with violence or aggression, particularly feminist men.

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

This is heartbreaking. This shit is why I don't feel comfortable presenting as outwardly cis male. When you are part of a demographic that is perceived as inherently violent and evil people will go out of their way to target you with violence or aggression, particularly feminist men.

...Wait, so you walk around looking like a homo?

 

[Ixian]

This is heartbreaking. This shit is why I don't feel comfortable presenting as outwardly cis male. When you are part of a demographic that is perceived as inherently violent and evil people will go out of their way to target you with violence or aggression, particularly feminist men.

Men are quite literally, the most likely demographic to be the victim of violent crime. Not women.

Feminism loves to push the fact that men commit most violent crimes, but always fails to mention that those men are a minority. They never bring up the fact that the vast majority of men commit no crimes, let alone violent ones. They never mention that a man is more likely to be a victim of violence than a woman.

So many people don't really know this, instead they are quite happy to showcase their misandrist beliefs, fostered by feminist organizations over the last 80 years, that men are so dangerous they would rather encounter a wild bear that absolutely will kill them.

To put it mildly, the Bear Question is completely misandrist, based on the sexist generalization that men are violent. The answer doesn't matter, the fact the question is asked seriously at all is a problem.

This is all just a really good showcase of Male Disposability.

 

[ThatZenoGuy]

People really shouldn't take what vindictive women have to say, seriously. You could ask them any stupid question of 'bad thing vs men' and they'd pick the bad thing. They do it for attention and because they're legitimately just shit people.

Ignore them, do not look at them, do not care for or about them. Deny them what they want.

 

[IndyFront]

...Wait, so you walk around looking like a homo?

More like a "they/them" lololololz

 

[LordsFire]

Sorry for disappearing from the thread; allergies have hit me like a truck, and I've had to be more stingy with my time and mental energy.

Today's the first day I've started catching up on the Politics subforum since Friday... I think.

 

[ATP]

Sorry for disappearing from the thread; allergies have hit me like a truck, and I've had to be more stingy with my time and mental energy.

Today's the first day I've started catching up on the Politics subforum since Friday... I think.

I hope,that allergies for leftism and progress would still hold to you !

 

[colorles]

On this whole "bear in the woods vs man in the woods" debate: I think the lot of you seriously underestimate just how afraid females are on a day to day basis. Most of them don't openly say it; but they are intimately aware of their own vulnerability. They are, to be quite frank, designed by nature to be in the care and protection of males of their kin. Without that guidance and protection from such males, they suffer on the inside and live in constant fear and insecurity. Again, this is not something most females will admit; but it is fact and my sources are the many females i have interacted with, intimately or not, and my own observations and experiences while alive on this earth.

Whether a bear or a man or whatever else; it doesn't matter. Females are living in fear.

 

[Jormungandr]

On this whole "bear in the woods vs man in the woods" debate: I think the lot of you seriously underestimate just how afraid females are on a day to day basis. Most of them don't openly say it; but they are intimately aware of their own vulnerability. They are, to be quite frank, designed by nature to be in the care and protection of males of their kin. Without that guidance and protection from such males, they suffer on the inside and live in constant fear and insecurity. Again, this is not something most females will admit; but it is fact and my sources are the many females i have interacted with, intimately or not, and my own observations and experiences while alive on this earth.

Whether a bear or a man or whatever else; it doesn't matter. Females are living in fear.

Yeah, but the problem is many women are seeing threats where there are none (e.g. any bloke walking down the street), or their fears are being stoked by women who have something to gain by making others feel fear from men in general (e.g. batshit feminists).

 

[IndyFront]

Yeah, but the problem is many women are seeing threats where there are none (e.g. any bloke walking down the street), or their fears are being stoked by women who have something to gain by making others feel fear from men in general (e.g. batshit feminists).

Maybe I am wrong about porn brain being a thing among males, but reality crime documentary brain is an ABSOLUTE thing among females if we're being fair...

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

Maybe I am wrong about porn brain being a thing among males, but reality crime documentary brain is an ABSOLUTE thing among females if we're being fair...

Let's just say Hollywood is not really known for promoting the values I personally have. XD

 

[Culsu]

Yeah, but the problem is many women are seeing threats where there are none (e.g. any bloke walking down the street), or their fears are being stoked by women who have something to gain by making others feel fear from men in general (e.g. batshit feminists).

The women chosing the bears are literally the same demographic that vote for their neighborhoods and nations being flooded by the type of man they (have actual, valid reason to ) fear. I can't take these people seriously. At this point I'm convinced they, specifically, do not deserve the right to vote.

 

[mrttao]

The women chosing the bears are literally the same demographic that vote for their neighborhoods and nations being flooded by the type of man they (have actual, valid reason to ) fear. I can't take these people seriously. At this point I'm convinced they, specifically, do not deserve the right to vote.

Well, yes.
This is why they think an apex predator will protect them.
The bear is obviously going to eat them instead.

I am surprised nobody made a meme of it.
> woman chooses bear
> bear eats woman

 

[Typhonis]

> woman chooses bear
> bear eats woman

Bear becomes violently I'll afterwards.

 

[SoliFortissimi]

women chosing the bears are literally the same demographic that vote for their neighborhoods and nations being flooded by the type of man they (have actual, valid reason to ) fea

There's a reason why millions of men (and women) who do consider the protection of women a top priority would never call themselves "feminists".

Spite isn't a rational long term policy.