"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

Didn't recent studies reveal the average woman rates something like 90% of men as 'below average'. Lmao.
To be blunt, even when these women are Jabba the Hutt look alikes or are being just average in looks, they still demand the top 0.5% -- even when they're single mothers, which effectively puts their chances from "maybe I'll win the lottery one day" to "Jason Voorhees not slaughtering people at Crystal Lake."

"He has to have a six pack, earn six figures, be over six foot, and have Six Inches to date me."
"...Okay, but you literally look like the kid Jabba the Hutt had after he fucked a walrus. Why would they even look at you?"
"REEEEeeee!"

Those top 0.5% aren't going to look at these women at all, or if they do it'll just be to pump'n'dump them. Those men have options, and they'll have hordes of what are basically supermodels in looks fighting over them, or these women would accept that they're one of many women they're fucking instead of their being committed solely to them.
 
The tragedy of the ones who look like the Jabba the Hutt is that, I think, your standard/default woman is at least passable if not attractive. If these people would just observe beauty standards, fix their attitude and take care of themselves, they’d be surprised how many men’s eyes they’d catch.

A person on Reddit once said to me, in a conversation like this, that he’d seen “so many beautiful women trapped in a prison of flesh and French fries.”

And you can probably say the same for a lot of men too.
 
The tragedy of the ones who look like the Jabba the Hutt is that, I think, your standard/default woman is at least passable if not attractive. If these people would just observe beauty standards, fix their attitude and take care of themselves, they’d be surprised how many men’s eyes they’d catch.

A person on Reddit once said to me, in a conversation like this, that he’d seen “so many beautiful women trapped in a prison of flesh and French fries.”

And you can probably say the same for a lot of men too.

lets be honest its not hard for a woman with realistic standards to get a man, not only that but a good man.

For most men the only time they will ever recieve flowers is the day they die, men through out the west and much of the world really don't have that much kindness in their lives. So just being nice and treating a man like a human being with respect and dignity can let a woman hit above her league.

Sure you wont get a guy in the top 10% but you can sure as hell get better then average acting like that.
 
Christianity is a forgiving religion. Who are we to deny forgiveness when God has already granted it?
yes, it is. a person who truly repents is forgiven.
however i'm going to argue that the problem is the fact that many of these women want to skip the repentance part.

also, remember that the last lines Jesus said to the adulteress were- "Go forth, and sin no more."
 
To be blunt, even when these women are Jabba the Hutt look alikes or are being just average in looks, they still demand the top 0.5% -- even when they're single mothers, which effectively puts their chances from "maybe I'll win the lottery one day" to "Jason Voorhees not slaughtering people at Crystal Lake."

"He has to have a six pack, earn six figures, be over six foot, and have Six Inches to date me."
"...Okay, but you literally look like the kid Jabba the Hutt had after he fucked a walrus. Why would they even look at you?"
"REEEEeeee!"

Those top 0.5% aren't going to look at these women at all, or if they do it'll just be to pump'n'dump them. Those men have options, and they'll have hordes of what are basically supermodels in looks fighting over them, or these women would accept that they're one of many women they're fucking instead of their being committed solely to them.
All I can hope is that men sort their shit out, and start ignoring women more. Nothing annoys women like not paying attention to them.
 
lets be honest its not hard for a woman with realistic standards to get a man, not only that but a good man.

For most men the only time they will ever recieve flowers is the day they die, men through out the west and much of the world really don't have that much kindness in their lives. So just being nice and treating a man like a human being with respect and dignity can let a woman hit above her league.

Sure you wont get a guy in the top 10% but you can sure as hell get better then average acting like that.
True. a woman that actually puts in the work who is willing to aim for the actual middle of the pack in terms of guys would find that it takes very little beyond a compliment, some attention, and cooking him a meal to land a guy.
 
The idea of seeking a partner for status, rather than for companionship and quality, is toxic in general.

It's not unique for either gender, but with men from what I've observed it tends to be high-competence men who are also egotistical who pursue a 'high status' (usually just means very physically attractive) women where the high status is a primary reason.

Every man, of course, is likely to prefer a more beautiful/sexy woman than a less, but most men will have a more realistic expectation, "Sure, it'd be nice to go out with the prom queen, but she won't give me the time of day, and Sally's reasonably cute and we get along."

Women though, of all levels of social status and personal qualities, have been encouraged by the culture to think that they deserve 'the best,' and that it's not just unfair, but outright misogynistic for a lower-status guy to think she's on his level, where 'misogynistic' means 'evil.' Not all women actually internalize this attitude, of course, but very large swathes of the population have, and completely setting aside the effect it has on men, it is purely destructive for themselves.

First off, it's selfish and immature, and actively embracing it retards maturation, making them more likely to stay selfish and immature. Selfishness and immaturity makes a person miserable in general, not just in romance.

Second off, building off the first element, this kind of thinking almost always warps a woman's perception of what makes a man 'high status.' 'High competence asshole with lots of money' is usually not actually a good romantic partner, and while he may get your motor running, you're almost certainly not going to be able to maintain a healthy relationship with him, even if you are high status/attractive enough to catch his attention, because he's probably as selfish and immature as you are.

As a side note, high-status, high-competent men who are also mature and good romantic partners, are almost always going to be too wise and discerning to try to build a serious relationship with a shallow and selfish woman, so no matter how attractive a woman is, if she has this immature and selfish mindset, good men generally aren't going to get involved with her. Hormones turning off the brain means it still happens sometimes, but those usually don't end well either.

Third off, this mentality tends to actively incentivize young men to display the high-competence asshole traits that these women throw themselves off. Creating more 'players' is not generally a good move. There will always be at least some in a large society, but incentivizing 'pick up artist' culture isn't doing women any good.


I suppose, in a way, PUAs, or 'rakes,' or 'players,' or whatever term you want to use, is the male equivalent of this mentality, but because of the differences between the sexes, only a small percentage of men can ever be such a thing. It doesn't really take them to happy places in the end either, even if they gain a lot of short-term pleasure out of it.
 
For all but legitimate medical crisis, yes.

Why do you raise the issue?
Not scary at all. :)
Because I don't want millions of unwanted children to grow up resenting a world where they shouldn't have existed. Nor do I want to force any woman to carry to term a foetus she does not want to.

Even if those Bible thumpers and their blatantly ignorant beliefs about life starting at conception were true, nobody can force you to support another being's life with your own. For example, nobody can force you to give a blood transfusion or organ transplant, even if it leads to the death of another person.

The autonomy of the body and social order are both only preserved by making abortion legal and available to anyone who wants one, for any reason that they can think of.


Of course, I know some don't agree with that. Some people want America to be a Christian Afghanistan or Iran. But I am not of that persuasion.
 
Because I don't want millions of unwanted children to grow up resenting a world where they shouldn't have existed.

I doubt either side of this particular debate is going to come up with any arguments here that have not been heard over and over again.

But I wonder if you would be willing to apply this concept of killing people who "shouldn't have existed" consistently?
 
Aren't the statistics surrounding the usually tolerable abortions (rape, medical reasons, incest) like less than 3% of all abortions?

I just don't want abortions to be used as birth control.

Which means that about 97% of abortions should be stopped, imo.

It's really simple, if you aren't ready to be a mother (or a father) or simply not ready to be pregnant, don't do the risky behavior that might end up with you being pregnant. Or at least mitigate the fuck out of the risk. Wear condoms, spermicide, IUDs. Simply have less sex, keep track of your period to better have sex around the most fertile days in your cycle. There are so many options before pregnancy, they can even be stacked.

'If you can't do the time, don't do the crime' except with sex and children. It's not fucking rocket surgery.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top