I'd argue sex ed should stay out of schools, if only because parents should be able to explain that shit. But seeing as parents are even more retarded than the retarded schools nowadays, I guess it has to stay.
"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists
- Thread starter Jormungandr
- Start date
Ixian
Well-known member
Public schooling is broke, the educational standards have been degrading for decades, a solid percentage of young Americans (18 to 25) are stuck at a 6th grade reading level.
Of course it's worse overall with boys, whose metrics have been falling like a rock since the 90s.
So I feel like things like sex ed classes are moot, the whole thing is a dumpster fire, what does it matter to toss in one more match?
Of course it's worse overall with boys, whose metrics have been falling like a rock since the 90s.
So I feel like things like sex ed classes are moot, the whole thing is a dumpster fire, what does it matter to toss in one more match?
Skitzyfrenic
Well-known member
And Sex Ed is teaching shit like anal fisting and BDSM safewords nowadays aren't they?
Creating the expectation that it's normal and not niche.
Creating the expectation that it's normal and not niche.
It actually does work.
mrttao
Well-known member
Yes, they also teach how to eat out a girl on her period.
And how male friends should "experiment" by licking each other's assholes to see if they like it. Because how will they know if they don't try it.
Not kidding, those are both exact specific examples I saw in schoolbooks for children.
The depravity, sexual grooming, and child abuse aside. It is horrendously unsanitary. and students taking it to heart and actually licking each other's assholes is why intestinal worms have made a comeback in western nations.
The Abstinence method, when taught, doesn't just teach that people should say no to pre-marital sex.
It should also talk evenly about the dangers of porn and how it changes your brain, how it devalues people.
It should also talk about the benefits of waiting til you're married.
Those are potentially very powerful lessons.
It should also talk evenly about the dangers of porn and how it changes your brain, how it devalues people.
It should also talk about the benefits of waiting til you're married.
Those are potentially very powerful lessons.
No, it doesn't. I know it may shock some people, but I used to be a kid, too. I also went to public schools and was around other kids my age. Abstinence only courses didn't work - I know from experience.
Yeah I am finding it very doubtful that teaching abstinence to modern ADHD-addled, porn addicted teenagers will work. These people are looking at shit that'd impress HR Giger.
Ixian
Well-known member
Yeah, telling horny teens "wait until marriage for sex" probably isn't going to work when they have 24/7 access to an unlimited variety of porn.
mrttao
Well-known member
When I was taught it, they just taught us about stds all day.
and gave us accurate factual information
> condom stops disease X, but does not stop disease Y. because disease Y spread through the skin contact not the mucus membrane.
> condom is 98% effective per year when used correctly. 94% effective per in practice because many people are morons who can't even use a condom correctly.
> only abstinance is 100% effective at stopping STD and pregnancy
IIRC porn was never mentioned.
of course nowadays they instead teach you to have as much casual sex as possible
mrttao
Well-known member
Yep.
King Arts
Well-known member
Well maybe schools picking it up was a mistake because just like with having a long drinking age in Ameica it just makes the people more immature compared to other nations. Now the parents are barely even worth being called parents as they are almost as much children as the children are and they need the government to parent.
It might be better to rip the bandaid off and just let some people and groups fall and let the smart ones rise up.
See this is the way to do it if you are going to do it.
"The best way to prevent STD's and dangers of unwanted pregnancy and other issues is abstinence.
However if you choose to not be abstinent, then the most prudent thing to do is practice safe sex so use of condoms is important."
There clinical not about weird fetishes let's you know the best thing to do but let's them know how to mitigate risks if they decide not to be abstinent.
Simonbob
Well-known member
It's the best way. If you try to screw with Reality, things never work.
Blasterbot
Well-known member
If you teach kids that sex is fun and consequence free go figure you end up with a lot more teen moms/abortions/STDs. If you teach kids that there are consequences to sex and that you can mitigate some of them you end up with a bunch of kids that think it won't happen to them. this isn't even touching on the long term issues that develop when people have dozens of partners before they are 20.
Even a Hoe can get a husband as long as she isn't too picky.
Blasterbot
Well-known member
unfortunately in their mind that isn't usually how it works. they start thinking they deserve a guy as nice as Jason who is as good in bed as Tyrone who is richer than Jake was when he was buying her all those nice things she deserves who is as good around the house as Paul was ect. It tends to be that they build up in their head that they deserve an amalgamation of the best traits of their previous guys without doing any work on themselves. it tends to be in the mid 30s early 40s that they start being willing to start to reduce their standards. but by that time guys their age aren't looking for a woman like them. they want a family and that means they gotta look a bit younger.
Didn't recent studies reveal the average woman rates something like 90% of men as 'below average'. Lmao.